r/SipsTea • • Jul 06 '26

Feels good man Bryan Johnson got Autoimmune Disease

Post image
33.6k Upvotes

4.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

35

u/_Stylite Jul 06 '26

Let’s be real, the dude is a total weirdo and comes off as extremely out of touch and narcissistic.

Most people are not going to like you if you use your large fortune expressly to pursue your own health and immortality as your primary goal, it is literally a hated trope.

17

u/poop-machines Jul 06 '26 edited Jul 07 '26

And actually I think it's normal to have a reaction like this in response. Or at least understandable.

Rich dude spends loads of money using his access to new treatments to extend his life, wasting millions on useless treatments that nobody else can afford while some die because they can't afford insulin, only for him to get an incurable disease that may even be due to the untested shit he has been doing? Of course that's going to feel poetic. Of course those with chronic diseases who are suffering, and maybe even dying, despite the existence of a cure that they can simply never afford, are going to feel a sense of guilty satisfaction.

It's not even about jealousy imo. It feels like it's more like a sense of injustice/justice, imo.

2

u/Temporary-Issue-7414 Jul 06 '26

Yes, because it’s his fault that the American medical system is broken. If he donated the $2 million he used for his longevity then the medical system would be fixed

0

u/poop-machines Jul 07 '26 edited Jul 07 '26

It's not just American. Everywhere around the world there's expensive treatments people can't afford for medical issues. Universal healthcare doesn't cover treatments that cost too much, leaving people to try gather money for it themselves.

This experience is a worldwide phenomenon. It's just more common in the USA than other developed nations, but definitely not more common than in the poorest nations.

Note: I'm not from the USA, I'm from a country with universal healthcare, and I still understand why there'll be some satisfaction in this.

Edit: For example, Cerliponase alfa, Trastuzumab deruxtecan, Olipudase alfa, TA809, Pralsetinib, Daraxonrasib, Donanemab, and lecanemab. All life changing, many of them life saving, some of them almost a certain cure and death prevention. All of them unavailable on the NHS.

In NZ, Eculizumab, crovalimab, iptacopan-type complement inhibitors, are not funded despite being incredible drugs, the same is true for many others.

In Aus, Futibatinib/Lytgobi are not prescribed despite being a lifesaving cancer treatment, again not isolated examples.

In Canada, Belantamab mafodotin combination (Blenrep regimen) is not prescribed due to cost. I could go on forever.

The point is not what could be fixed, but simply that there's a feeling of injustice when people see him spend so much on unproven treatments that could be making him sick. Like he's taking his health for granted, being a guinea pig. A gamble, when they're facing certain death because they can't afford a sure treatment. Others just feel like he's out of touch and kinda insane/eccentric, and they get a bad vibe from him. It doesn't have to be rational.

9

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/chazysciota Jul 06 '26

He's probably accomplished just as much as he would have if he had just bought a bunch of cars or boats or whatever. So, to each his own, I guess.

1

u/SaiyanApe17 Jul 06 '26

Most people are not going to like you if you use your large fortune expressly to pursue your own health and immortality as your primary goal, it is literally a hated trope.

Why? Are people too stupid to realize that on his journey he might discover something interesting that will help them?

1

u/foxymophadlemama Jul 06 '26

it's important we demonstrate our gratitude to the rich because there might be a good piece of corn to eat in the poop they leave everywhere.

0

u/SaiyanApe17 Jul 06 '26

no more like "its stupid to make fun of the guy trying to invent flying because one day you will get to use an airplane to travel the world"

2

u/_Stylite Jul 06 '26

This guy isn’t inventing flying, he’s hardly doing any meaningful science or invention at all.

He’s more like a guy trying to turn himself into a bird, and perhaps other people trying to become birds will learn from him.

It’s stupid and only helps himself really.

1

u/SaiyanApe17 Jul 06 '26

I dont think you are going to understand anyways but lets put it this way, if you were alive 300 years ago you'd be the guy running around yelling about the devil and wanting to burn anyone found dissecting bodies at the stake.

1

u/_Stylite Jul 06 '26 edited Jul 06 '26

No, I don’t think this person is the devil for spending outsized resources on himself. I just think he’s a narcissist. I would’ve had the same criticism 300 yrs ago and people did criticize the wealthy for greed at that time.

If you were alive 300 yrs ago you’d be “shining the shoes” of someone who is probably 1,000x wealthier than you, to put it in PG terms…

0

u/Amazing-Spinach5693 Jul 06 '26

You want him to user other people instead?
Hes literally experimenting and documenting on himself and sharing everything with the world.

1

u/_Stylite Jul 06 '26

Yes, if he was doing actual science I would have more respect for him

1

u/Amazing-Spinach5693 Jul 07 '26

He is.

1

u/_Stylite Jul 07 '26

Really? Show me one scientific publication he’s made

1

u/Amazing-Spinach5693 Jul 07 '26

Dont need to make a scientific publication to do science.
"Oo you drive cars? show me you driving a Porsche"

1

u/_Stylite Jul 07 '26

Actually yes you need to publish to “do science,” or contribute to science.
What do you think science even is? It quite literally revolves around publishing

1

u/Amazing-Spinach5693 Jul 07 '26

Then go on to his own websites?
He publishes ALL his steps and findings publicly.

Again there are more than one way to do science.
You don't need to do a professional study for it to be science.

1

u/_Stylite Jul 07 '26

I can publish whatever I want on a website, that doesn’t make it science. Science has to have a hypothesis and replicable experiments to be considered meaningful. It also typically needs to have results published in a peer reviewed journal. Just publishing data is actually not science. Please read more about what science is

1

u/Amazing-Spinach5693 Jul 07 '26

Nope what youre talking about is called a peer reviewed study.
Do i need to say it again?

"Ohh you are a driver? show me you driving a Porsche"
There are more than one way to do science.

Also every single one of his experiments are replicable as he provides step for step and what, why and how he does something.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/bertbarndoor Jul 06 '26

How do you know it is "expressly" or even "primarily"?? You give yourself and that chip on your shoulder away with that.

-1

u/Hurtmeii Jul 06 '26

Its not just his own health though from what I'm understanding. If he's using himself as an experiment for longevity science then that's not pure selfishness.

2

u/TBP42069 Jul 06 '26

Please lol