WSO's 60 Years of Star Trek & Beyond: A wonderful performance, but a disappointing celebration. Did anyone else feel this way?
I attended the Winnipeg Symphony Orchestra's 60 Years of Star Trek & Beyond concert on Thursday evening with my brother, who is a huge Star Trek fan and was genuinely excited about the show. I was looking forward to it myself. After all, we're talking about 60 years of Star Trek, with an extraordinary musical legacy spanning television and film.
I walked away with some very mixed feelings, and unfortunately, more disappointment than I expected.
First, the positives, because there were certainly some wonderful moments.
John de Lancie was an absolute delight. His return as Q, his timing, banter, and interactions with the audience were easily among the highlights of the evening. He brought the wit, charm, and mischievousness you'd expect from the character, and in many ways, I felt he saved the night.
The WSO musicians and conductor were also fantastic. When they performed the familiar Star Trek scores, they were magnificent. From the iconic fight music of the original series to the sweeping cinematic themes of the films, these were the moments I had hoped to experience. Hearing that music performed live by such talented musicians was genuinely special.
For a while, the concert seemed to be delivering exactly what we'd come for.
Then came the second half.
Composer Nick DiBerardino contributed new works inspired by Star Trek episodes and themes. Now, I have no objection to original compositions or to taking creative risks. Star Trek itself has always been about exploration, challenging expectations, and trying something different.
The first piece, inspired by Tapestry from The Next Generation, was certainly different. I thought it dragged a little, but it still felt reasonably connected to the evening and the ideas being explored. The mariachi homage to Q was particularly hilarious and a welcome bit of levity.
There were also some political jabs throughout the evening. I expected a certain amount of that, given Star Trek's history of social commentary, and normally it wouldn't bother me. However, some of the humour felt unnecessarily partisan and a little out of place, particularly during an evening encouraging us to embrace different perspectives and ideals. That message felt somewhat undermined by the delivery.
But my biggest disappointment came with DiBerardino's piece inspired by Darmok and Jalad.
This, for me, was where the concert lost its momentum, and seemingly a good portion of the audience.
The composition seemed to go on endlessly, with a repetitive xylophone sequence that just kept returning, again and again. At one point, my brother leaned over and whispered that it sounded like a CD skipping.
I couldn't help but agree.
Perhaps I'm simply not sophisticated enough to appreciate what the composer was attempting. I'm perfectly willing to concede that there may have been layers of musical meaning or artistic intention that escaped me.
But as an audience member, I found it excruciating.
It went on far too long. I could sense restlessness in the room, although obviously I can't speak for everyone. Personally, I reached a point where I was no longer interested in what the piece was trying to communicate. I just wanted it to end.
And, frankly, I became increasingly frustrated that so much of the concert was being devoted to this composition instead of the extraordinary catalogue of Star Trek music that brought many of us there in the first place.
None of this is a criticism of the musicians, particularly the percussionists, who performed admirably. They deserve recognition for their skill and dedication. My issue is entirely with the composition itself and the decision to give it such a prominent place in the program.
At its worst, it felt less like a celebration of Star Trek's musical history and more like an opportunity for a composer to showcase his own work.
I subsequently came across a comment John de Lancie made in a radio interview before the concert:
"A Star Trek audience is a really educated audience and they're willing to go places."
I understand the sentiment, and to a degree, I agree with it. Star Trek audiences are generally open-minded, curious, and willing to engage with challenging ideas. That's part of what makes the franchise special.
But I fundamentally disagree with the suggestion that being an educated or open-minded audience means we should automatically appreciate every artistic departure presented to us.
There's a difference between being willing to explore something new and enjoying where that exploration takes you.
And there's also a difference between challenging an audience and losing sight of why that audience came in the first place.
This was billed as a celebration of 60 years of Star Trek. That's six decades of remarkable music, from Alexander Courage and Jerry Goldsmith to James Horner, Leonard Rosenman, Dennis McCarthy, and so many others.
There was an enormous musical legacy to draw upon, much of which we barely touched.
Instead, a substantial portion of the evening was devoted to new compositions that, at least for me, didn't come close to capturing the emotional impact of the originals.
Yes, the concert's promotional material mentioned new music, and I certainly didn't expect two hours of familiar themes played note for note. Some experimentation was welcome. But I did expect the balance to favour the music that made Star Trek so memorable over those 60 years.
Following the lengthy Darmok and Jalad piece, we finally returned to a couple of recognizable Star Trek selections. They were wonderful, but almost as quickly as we'd returned to familiar territory, the concert was over.
It left me wishing we'd heard so much more.
And perhaps what disappointed me most was looking over at my brother, knowing how much he'd been anticipating this evening. I wanted it to be something truly memorable for him, a celebration of the franchise he loves.
Instead, I felt we'd attended something that was as much a composer's personal passion project as it was a tribute to Star Trek.
That's unfortunate because when the WSO actually played Star Trek, they were absolutely brilliant. I would gladly have listened to another hour of those scores. The orchestra clearly had the talent to make this an unforgettable evening.
I don't regret going, and I certainly appreciate the hard work and artistry involved. But I left feeling that an opportunity had been missed.
Maybe I'm in the minority. Perhaps others found the new compositions moving or thought the overall program struck exactly the right balance.
I'd genuinely like to hear from other people who attended.
Did you enjoy the direction the concert took, particularly in the second half? Or did you, like me, find yourself wishing we'd spent more time celebrating the incredible music Star Trek has given us over the past 60 years?