r/interesting • u/ZookeepergameIcy6089 • Apr 16 '26

Additional Context Pinned All because she couldn’t cut the drive thru line

43.0k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

8.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

72

u/Lovat69 Apr 16 '26

The driver lost the ability to drive for six months. Interesting they don't say what happened to the crazy person that climbed onto her car.

85

u/Psychological_Day_1 Apr 16 '26

She is going to try her luck at the Paralympics now.

11

u/uwunuzzlesch Apr 16 '26

The driver is the paralympic athlete.

25

u/[deleted] Apr 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/justinchina Apr 16 '26

That will be a heck of a heat when they end up head to head

1

u/prudentWindBag Apr 16 '26

Looks like you and I will both be heading to hell... 😆😆😆

1

u/Somanylyingliars Apr 16 '26

Hee hee haw haw until you land in prison for life for killing them. Oh congrats 🤩 you played yourself 😆😆

1

u/prudentWindBag Apr 21 '26

Huh?

Going to hell for laughing, bud...

1

u/uwunuzzlesch Apr 16 '26

Well the lady didn't get injured so, no? Lol

11

u/dirtdustdebris Apr 16 '26

Woosh

3

u/uwunuzzlesch Apr 16 '26

I mean the lady on the car didn't get injured, so

Aside from road rash, im guessing

0

u/leonas_ Apr 16 '26

Woosh again

5

u/uwunuzzlesch Apr 16 '26

Whats the joke I am missing.

-1

u/leonas_ Apr 16 '26

The joke os thaz the woman clinging to the windshield can now also compete in the paralympics

6

u/fintip Apr 16 '26

Yes. You seemed to have missed the joke entirely.

The joke is that the driver is a known paralympic athlete.

The passenger on the hood, after this experience, will also now be trying for the paralympics, because of their implied injuries from this event.

-3

u/uwunuzzlesch Apr 16 '26

Yeah except she isnt hurt. I get the joke but it doesn't make sense because she's not.

3

u/fintip Apr 16 '26

Did it say she wasn't hurt? All I saw was people commenting on how odd it is that nothing was said about her condition.

In any case, that isn't essential to the joke for it to work–but especially given the ambiguity.

0

u/uwunuzzlesch Apr 16 '26

I'd assume minimum road rash, and considering the lenient sentence (6 months of no driving) and lack of details, I'd guess no broken bones.

Just didn't get what was so funny ig

1

u/RepresentativeAnt128 Apr 16 '26

Are you the lady that was on the car?

2

u/1burritoPOprn-hunger Apr 16 '26

I think you missed the joke

1

u/Chickenmangoboom Apr 16 '26

She is now also a coach in a heartwarming turn!

2

u/lostandlooking_ Apr 17 '26

Tonya and Nancy, Paralympic’s edition

1

u/1burritoPOprn-hunger Apr 16 '26

Massively underappreciated comment

lmao

1

u/phoenics1908 Apr 17 '26

I’m going to hell for laughing at this comment. 🤭

2

u/iopele Apr 16 '26

Yeah, I really wanted to know the outcome for her! I figure she couldn't have been too terribly injured or the driver would've gotten a harsher sentence, but I want to know regardless. Wonder if she learned anything?

1

u/uwunuzzlesch Apr 16 '26

I would guess some road rash minimum. If there were any broken bones or serious injuries it would've said but they likely wouldn't mention road rash.

2

u/cyrusthemarginal Apr 16 '26

couple of boo boos

2

u/Skratt79 Apr 16 '26

Worth it!

1

u/Dexy1017 Apr 16 '26

Right?? I tried to see if that was reported anywhere, along with whatever actual injuries she sustained, but to no avail.

1

u/PerVertesacker Apr 16 '26

Which feels to me like a slap on the wrist to be fair. I mean the driver clearl, endangered the live of this crazy lady. Not saying I blame the driver at all, but just getting your license revoked for 6 months isnt that bad. The judge basically said: well, we cant just let you off the hook but yeah, I get you.

0

u/bfodder Apr 17 '26

Not saying I blame the driver at all

I do.

I'm not absolving the crazy woman but the driver seemingly expressed glee at the prospect of that crazy woman possibly dying by her hand.

1

u/OliveFarming Apr 16 '26

Had to nurse her ego and wounds for a minimum of 6 months

1

u/bfodder Apr 17 '26

Honestly other than being really obnoxious and crazy, what did she actually do wrong? Did she break any laws?

1

u/vyrus2021 Apr 17 '26

Before the video starts she tried to enter the vehicle and started damaging the outside. To me that's a threat of physical harm. Then crazy stands in front of the car and gets on the hood and doesn't let go when the car begins to move again.

1

u/bfodder Apr 17 '26

She certainly should have some sort of punishment for that, but I feel like it is overshadowed by the driver trying to kill her.

1

u/Several_Estate5285 Apr 17 '26

Tbf what was she supposed to do. Just drive around at a moderate speed with this woman latched on?!

-2

u/[deleted] Apr 16 '26

[deleted]

5

u/DelcoUnited Apr 16 '26

She consented.

-1

u/photosendtrain Apr 16 '26

You can't consent to serious bodily harm, with some exceptions for sports and other things, but generally no.

2

u/BookProper9115 Apr 16 '26

When you jump on someone's car, you are consenting at that point. Period. You knew what the consequences are when you chose to jump onto a vehicle, and not only just a vehicle; but one in which you were attacking the driver and trying to break into the vehicle.

2

u/2FastHaste Apr 17 '26

Is this an American thing? I just find it incredibly alienating that so many people think like that.

Killing someone is something extremely serious with grave consequences. There needs to be a really good justification for it. There needs to be no other way out of the situation.

How is this even remotely the case here.

2

u/BookProper9115 Apr 17 '26

I find it incredibly fucking weird that people think the driver did anything wrong at all. We live in two completely different realities.

Have fun being a victim wherever you live. I wouldn't want to live anywhere that legally obligates me to retreat or not defend myself, that is objectively weak behavior. No thanks.

2

u/warmachinex0 Apr 19 '26

So, is the driver just supposed to wait for the crazy lady to pull her out of the car an hurt her? This is crazy, the person in the car was assaulted. Does your country usually let the perp have rights over the victim too?

1

u/2FastHaste Apr 19 '26

No just lock the door to reduce the chance of your scenario happening from 1% to 0.1%.

I think it's better than taking the 80% chance to severely injure or murder the mentally unstable person like the driver did.

The danger comes from the person inside the lethal weapon that is a car. It's not coming from the person on the hood having an episode.

2

u/warmachinex0 Apr 19 '26

If someone is crazy enough to try and open your door, they are crazy enough to brake your window. She was also crazy enough to hang onto a moving car, that's dangerous crazy. The lady drove away in the first place because she tried to enter.

1

u/2FastHaste Apr 19 '26

Are we seeing the same video? The woman is not trying to open any door.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/DelcoUnited Apr 17 '26

She isn’t attempting to kill her, she’s attempting to flee her. It’s not her fault the instigator won’t let her.

1

u/2FastHaste Apr 18 '26

She's clearly putting her in a likely fatal or life-changing situation.

And I'm not sure what you mean by flee there? It's not like she's being attacked by the t-1000.

The chance that she will be physically harmed if she stays in the car and keep her doors locked is about 0.01%.

0

u/[deleted] Apr 17 '26

[deleted]

1

u/BookProper9115 Apr 17 '26

Where I live there would be no judge involved, in this situation you would be able to use deadly force and be justified. Glad I don't live in some ass backwards place where the driver would be penalized for doing something any rational person would do. Don't understand how so many weirdos here think she did anything wrong.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 17 '26

[deleted]