647
2d ago edited 10h ago
[deleted]
256
u/MrScotchyScotch 2d ago
You mean your company doesn't have a single person whose job is HR and whose name on slack is HR and makes jokes about not hiring people?
47
u/palk0n 2d ago
his name? albert einstein
22
10
2
1
15
u/PryomancerMTGA 2d ago
I can't even imagine a situation in which well written code for a basic task would be given a 0% probability of being AI written.
3
u/buttonmasher525 1d ago
Unless his coding style is super non-standard and an AI wouldn't use his method of whitespace management or something. Like if he put his curly braces in a weird spot or something else along those lines. But yeah 0% is still wild tho.
4
u/sombertownDS 2d ago
Spend five minutes on r/recruitinghell and you’ll see
-4
u/sneakpeekbot 2d ago
Here's a sneak peek of /r/recrutinghell using the top posts of the year!
#1: Always ask them the salary range for the role. Then you can cook | 0 comments
#2: Got rejected for the 200th time 😭✨
#3: withdrew from an interview process after they asked me to redesign the CEO's investor deck live
I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact | Info | Opt-out | GitHub
1
0
u/the_useful_comment 2d ago
If it was the person who wasn’t hire dodged a huge bullet. Culture would be trash.
30
51
u/Drudgework 2d ago
When I was going through my software design courses the philosophy was if your design docs are good enough you shouldn’t have to code it yourself. The idea was that with proper documentation you could pass the coding off to lower paid employees for cost savings. Ai coding would have been a revelation to my professors back then. But now the philosophy is don’t bother documenting anything, we’ll pay extra for an ai to design and code it, then pay for another AI to debug it every time it breaks because no one knows how it works.
The industry has learned the wrong lesson and this is going to go the same way American manufacturing did. First we offloaded the labor and only did the high level stuff. Then we offloaded the designing and only did the research. Now we’re offloading the research and no one knows how to actually make things anymore even so we are beholden to other people that definitely aren’t our friends for everything we need and they can charge whatever they want for it, because what are we going to do? Make it ourselves?
12
242
u/NighthawK1911 2d ago
Dumbass HR.
This is why you don't give HR veto powers like that. Same with nepo middle management.
Meritocracy can only work if technical people get into management.
90
-45
u/JaironKalach 2d ago
Technical people are often the worst. They only know how to hire clones of themselves.
15
1
25
u/DJNgamez 2d ago
Funny sure, but it's important to note that "AI detectors" are very regularly wrong and unreliable
13
u/Rabbidraccoon18 2d ago
Yeah they just detect patters if you change the style a bit it'll significantly reduce the percentage.
8
u/ActurusMajoris 1d ago
Yeah that’s a problem for us that likes consistency and do spell checking.
You have to introduce rrors on purpose to avoid being accused of using AI :/
5
u/DJNgamez 1d ago
You can also inject white/invisible text between paragraphs with random junk so AI detectors detect it's real without having to actually make errors in the readable portion
6
u/juliankennedy23 2d ago
I mean the idea anyone in HR could perform a task like that is science fiction. They have trouble with opening a PDF.
6
6
4
u/TheOpeningThread 1d ago
Yeah "haha". Hope he doesn't complain when his ai regional manager tells him the same thing on his way out
3
2
2d ago
[deleted]
5
2d ago edited 10h ago
[deleted]
1
u/cowboysaurus21 2d ago
To be fair I've had many jobs and never used Slack (but I still knew what it was)
1
1
u/killer-tank218 1d ago
Ngl, discord not in dark mode is so cursed I genuinely didn’t realize it was discord for a minute.
1
1
u/LiterallyRain 23h ago
Probably fake. But tbh if I was an employer I wouldn't hire someone who only codes by hand either. Not using available tools is just stubborn. If they asked whether they're permitted to use AI or not and got told no then that changes things.
Depends on the length and nature of the code though. If it's a few lines then whatever, but if they hand coded 500 lines that isn't very complex I'd find it questionable, because a well written prompt could produce the same result in a fraction of the time even with reasonable complexity, and I'd be paying for their time.
1
u/eugene20 2h ago
If a live code assessment is just getting AI generated results they almost may as well just ask which LLM they intend to use and be done with it.
I did say almost, I'm well aware better crafted prompts will have better results.
0
•
u/AutoModerator 2d ago
Hi Coffee_MysticRealm, thank you for your submission to /r/Angryupvote!
This is just a friendly reminder to make sure your post is in accordance with our subreddit rules, as well as the sitewide reddit.com content policy. The rules have recently been changed, so make sure to read This post to get up to date on all the changes. Thanks!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.