It’s likely way way way easier to just roll it in. Disassemble and rebuild an entire space shuttle? Without damaging or losing parts? And rebuilding it correctly?
Especially when it will inevitably be needed again in a last ditch effort to save humanity my taking a plucky group of misfit heroes into space. At least that’s what my time in sci-fi has taught me.
Roll it in? From Washington DC to Texas? Are you fucking crazy? Did you not see the OP's video of how difficult it was to get a space shuttle from an airport to a local museum? How are you going to do that for half the entirety of the US? The planes used to move the Shuttles by air don't even exist anymore. The Shuttles cannot be moved anymore.
That's what John Cornyn and Ted Cruz wanted to do to move Discovery from Washington DC to Texas, but they found out it's impossible to do without irreparable damage to the spacecraft. It's designed to survive trips to space and back, not to be chopped up and reassembled (such a design constraint would probably make it fall apart upon reentry).
I don't think it's an unreasonable thing to ask. It was assembled from pieces, it's surely worth considering returning it to those pieces and reassembling it.
Sure, cause disassembly should be a feature for something that undergoes a lot of stress upon reentry into the atmosphere. I wonder if people don’t think these days
Most major air and space museums do have one reasonably close. Sometimes a few miles, but often closer.
However, large aircraft can present difficulties, and spacecraft are their own animal. As others mention, the modified 747s that ferried the orbiters are retired.
39
u/Pentecost_II 9h ago
They couldn't just have flown to the destination?