There was a game against Nebraska maybe a decade ago where if Oregon had just taken 7 each time they would have won. But they kept going for 2 like idiots and it ended up like 34-32 for the Huskers
I’m kind of tight about it backfiring but I am ok with it. It’s such a hindsight thing which is always 20/20. I know it looks like it ended our chances but ultimately when we had — at 11:00 to go in the 4th — 5 first downs and 6 turnovers, we didn’t deserve it and the failed 2 pt isn’t that big in my eyes
Definitely hilarious (and probably true) but there were a lot of "what ifs" that also could've made this a runaway game for UCLA. missed field goal, turnovers on Oregon's side of the field, turnover on downs in the endzone.
256
u/PositiveFriendlyGuy 6d ago
If only oregon had 6 turnovers instead of 7 they probably win it lmao