r/Homebrewing • • Jun 22 '26

Under Pressure: Analyzing The Results From Past exBEERiments On Pressurized Fermentation

https://brulosophy.com/2026/06/22/under-pressure-analyzing-the-results-from-past-exbeeriments-on-pressurized-fermentation/
62 Upvotes

41 comments sorted by

18

u/brulosopher Jun 22 '26

Over the last decade, we've performed many xBmts looking at the impact pressurized fermentation has on various styles of beer, mostly lagers, and the results have been quite interesting. This week, Marshall goes over all of those past xBmts in hopes of painting a more cohesive picture of this fascinating variable. Check it out!

7

u/Another_Casual_ Jun 22 '26

Always an interesting read!

I use temperature control and some pressure (starting at 1-2 psi and ramping up to 15 as fermentation nears the end). For me it's the convenience of pulling samples with a picnic tap, saving some of the aroma I smell coming through the air lock, a pressurized transfer without hauling my CO2 tank over to the fermentation chamber, and mostly carbonated beer right after transferring. I'd be too scared to try and make a lager at 90 degrees or something similar and rely on pressure to save the day. 

I'd be interested to see if there's a difference between dry hopping with an air lock or dry hoping in a sealed vessel. I've felt I get more aroma when it's sealed, but it could be anecdotal. 

1

u/hallslys Jun 22 '26

I my experience, i get shit extraction from hops if i dry hop under pressure, because the hops drop to the bottom (i have a sight glass in my conical.) Then you either have to rouse them with co2 and risk blowing some of the aroma out of the airlock/spunding valve, or reduce pressure to make the hops float again.

2

u/EverlongMarigold Jun 22 '26

At what point in the process do you dry hop? I've started dry hopping at high krausen for 3-5 days. It's done wonders for my hazy pales and IPAs.

1

u/Another_Casual_ Jun 22 '26

I've been doing the same and I've been perceiving more hop character and aroma.  

1

u/Bark0s Jun 22 '26

I really like a high krausen dry hop AND a post yeast dump dry hop, at about 12c. Definitely need to agitate/rouse the hops a few times during the secondary dry hop.

-1

u/hallslys Jun 22 '26

Yeah you’ll get good biotransformation like that, but it doesnt give the typical dry hop character.

0

u/Bark0s Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26

Keep the pressure below 15psi and they should stay buoyant. Well, buoyanter.

Edit: tired me mixed my units of measure.

5

u/hallslys Jun 22 '26

Pressure below what or temperature above 15, what do you mean?

1

u/Positronic_Matrix Jun 22 '26

Fifteen times the speed of light.

5

u/TheLizardOfOz Jun 22 '26

Very interesting to see all of these next to each other! It seems like there are a bunch results suggesting that pressure fermenting doesn't impact flavour at warm temps, and one saying that pressure fermenting at warmer temps isn't that different from fermenting at lager temps.

To me this makes me wonder if most people could even tell the difference between a lager fermented at cold temps and one fermented at warm temps? With the variables of pressure and pressure plus temperature explored, this leaves just temperature. Have any exbeeeriments been performed on this?

8

u/brulosopher Jun 22 '26

We have done many xBmts on exactly this and generally, no, tasters cannot tell such beers apart. At least when fermented with certain years strains, namely Weihenstephan (34/70) and Pilsner Urquell. For other strains, like Grupo Modelo and Augustiner, while the stats suggest a meaningful difference based on ferm temp, taster often rate the warm fermented version as being more lager-like. Fascinating stuff.

4

u/TheLizardOfOz Jun 22 '26

Interesting, I appreciate the more scientific lens you folks put into seeing what's actually making people's beer better. I have a buddy who's just been cutting more and more corners as he brews more to the point he doesn't even sanitize any more. He makes decent beer so I enjoy watching how little he gets away with doing haha.

2

u/BartholomewSchneider Jun 23 '26

I have one keg fermenter that I haven’t cleaned in nearly two years. After pressure transferring to serving kegs, I dump most of the yeast slurry and then pump the next batch in. Works great.

1

u/TheLizardOfOz Jun 23 '26

Nice! I need to re use my yeast more.

2

u/Positronic_Matrix Jun 22 '26

For me, given the combined xBmt results, objective lab data, and hundreds of anecdotal reports I’ve received from brewers on every level, the juice just isn’t worth the squeeze.

Your analysis pivoted to an opinion piece with a rhetorical assertion in the penultimate sentence: “hundreds of anecdotal reports I’ve received from brewers on every level.” That rhetorical statement is then used to support the concluding assertion “that the juice isn’t worth the squeeze.”

A technically accurate (and thus better) assertion would be that the meta analysis does not contain evidence that pressurized fermentation is better or worse than traditional fermentation within the limited scope of meta-analysis.

0

u/01reksilat Intermediate Jun 23 '26

Nerd

1

u/tyda1957 Jun 23 '26

... You're in the home-brewing subreddit. We're all nerds. And if you're not, get out.

10

u/jaytomten Jun 22 '26

Pressure fermenting still allows me to pre purge kegs with CO2 and perform pressurized closed transfers. So still a very valuable process for me to keep for my home brewery.

2

u/Positronic_Matrix Jun 22 '26

Indeed. Pressurized fermentation has several advantages as follows:

  • Warmer fermentation temperatures
  • Closed transfers for oxygen sensitive beers
  • Elimination of suck back when cold crashing
  • Natural carbonation for immediate drinking
  • Elimination of CO₂ loss to tank purging

It also solved my problem of conical getting clogged when brewing highly flocculant beers with a lot of protein. The floating dip tubes made all that pain go away. I also acquired a few Sanke kegs over the years and never used them because they were inconvenient. Now, they are my official fermenting kegs.

I think the juice is worth the squeeze if one looks beyond the meta-analysis published.

2

u/BoyMeetsWort Brewgrass Homebrew Jun 23 '26

i agree that the purging of oxygen is the main advantage. I've had some great spunded beers, but it is tough to say that they are meaningfully cleaner than standard fermented ones.

3

u/boarshead72 Yeast Whisperer Jun 22 '26

I loved that one with 808. It cracked me up when the lab results came in for the two beers and White Labs “designed for pressure” yeast blend was already totally fine at that temperature without any added pressure.

3

u/vdWcontact Jun 22 '26

Nice review!

3

u/bskzoo BJCP Jun 22 '26

Homebrew Happy Hour just had a good episode on pressure fermenting too. I don’t personally do it, but can’t argue with some of the competition results from last years Homebrewer of the year winner.

It was fun listening to his theories and methods.

Wayne Doucette I believe.

2

u/fuzzdood Jun 22 '26

I add a spunding valve at the end of fermentation to get pressure to around 8 ps. I then remove it when cold crashing and the pressure prevents my plastic fermzilla fermenter from buckling inwards. Then closed transfer to keg, so no chance for oxygen to get in at any step.

2

u/MercifulGiraffe Jun 22 '26

That’s exactly what I do as well

2

u/ThatTysonKid Jun 22 '26

This was an interesting read. Personally, I feel like most of the experiments were testing the wrong thing. Only Alex Shanks-Abel tested high pressure/high temp vs no pressure/low temp (modern vs traditional if you will). I'd like to see more data on this, as their findings were that it was indistinguishable under pressure or no.

As a side note, I prefer pressure fermentation because its more convenient and eliminates the risk of oxidisation, especially with hoppy beers. I use the waste CO2 to flush and pressurise my kegs too, so my whole brew is basically set and forget.

1

u/deckerhand0 Jun 23 '26

I was thinking about getting into pressure fermentation, but a pro where I said you’re not gonna get the crispness or the results you think you’re gonna get. That’s sassy advice he gave me I personally haven’t done it yet but it’s always an idea that I’m toying with doing.

1

u/BartholomewSchneider Jun 23 '26

The squeeze for me is ending up with perfectly carbonated beer, and that is worth it. I let the fermentation kick off at ambient pressure, then connect the spunding valve set to 25-30psi (depending on the temperature of my basement).

1

u/ThatLemur Jun 22 '26

I understand stats but I feel like the structure of the experiment was never explained. Was one beer fermented under pressure and finished much quicker while the other was fermented traditionally, and then asked people to see if there was a difference in flavor? And since they couldn’t tell, the author is pro-pressurization..?

2

u/the_snook Jun 22 '26

All the experiments reviewed in the linked article used the same temperature for both samples, with one pressurized and one not. None showed significant differences, so the reviewer's conclusion is somewhat anti-pressure.

5

u/Ragadorus Pro Jun 22 '26

...you mean, besides the one where it was pressure fermented warm vs non-pressure fermented cold?

2

u/the_snook Jun 22 '26

Right. One out of the nine. I missed that one.

That and the Helles fermented at 27°C are the only ones I find interesting really. Pale Ale at 20°C? What were they honestly expecting to find? I guess it can show that pressure fermenting isn't actively bad for the beer.

-5

u/Gileaders Jun 22 '26

As usual you idiots can’t find a difference in anything. I feel so sad for any newbie brewer that listens to your pseudo science bullshit.

3

u/Positronic_Matrix Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26

False. They are correctly applying the scientific method. The results show that brewing is not as sensitive to many of the variables that bro-science had previously assumed. As such, it’s very useful to new brewers as it can help them focus on the things that do matter.

-3

u/Gileaders Jun 23 '26

The problem being at brulosophy nothing matters so you'll be improving nothing.

3

u/chino_brews Jun 23 '26

You could be kinder, and also mind the #1 rule of this subreddit, Wheaton's Law.

Your comments are spoken like someone who is a true believer in how they do it, so are not open to other ideas. But maybe I am projecting something onto you that is not correct?

I'm not putting you in these camps, but we had people very angry and nasty about batch sparging back in the day because they were invested in fly sparging. Then the same thing happened with BIAB.

No one wants to believe what they are doing has no meaning.

But another way to look at the Brulosophy experiments is that humans are really bad at identifying, in a fair challenge, beers that are separated by one, little process or ingredient difference.

In some cases, the single variable is a whole technique and can be readily isolated, so by the volume of experiments and weight of anecdotal experiences, we can say it doesn't matter. Case in point, both sending the trub to the fermentor and "warm-ish" lager fermentation with certain strains have many experiments plus tens of thousands of batches behind them. Thus, I feel comfortable definitively saying that it's OK to run the trub to the fermentor and you can get indistinguishable lagers at both 50°F and 60-65°F with W-24/70, S-23, and S-189. Those deserve to be called good practices.

Yet, for many variables, it's also fair to say that one unknown variable alone cannot the identified by humans in the taste of beer, but when you start to cumulate some of the other "insignificant" factors in Brulosophy experiments, you will get identifiably bad beer.

Instead of railing against Brulosophy, my advice is to just evaluate whether it makes sense to you, with you equipment and techniques. If you see any flaws in their methodology, call them out on it.

3

u/Gileaders Jun 23 '26

I have a better rule. Don’t lie to people so you can exist to sell them stuff. Plenty of peer reviewed scientific brewing knowledge out there. Maybe try spreading some of that instead. 

1

u/chino_brews Jul 15 '26

Do you have any peer-reviewed journal articles you want to make a post about?

I am not aware of any peer-reviewed journals with brewing info that are open access, other than the J. Inst. Brewing & Distilling, which is kind of a problem when starting discussions with the normal public. (JIDB apparently ceased publication in 2022.) The other issue is that from what I've seen, little peer reviewed research seems relevant to homebrewers and their scale, equipment, and methods. For example, none of the articles in the last issue of JIBD are really useful for homebrewers:

  • The impact of caramel and roasted wheat malts on aroma compounds in top-fermented wheat beer
  • Optimization of alkaline extraction of protein from brewer’s spent grain
  • The effect of barley infected with xylanase-producing filamentous fungi on premature yeast flocculation
  • Simulation of the behaviour of volatile compounds during batch multi-stage distillation of whisky

But maybe I'm missing some resources out there that you are aware of?

1

u/Gileaders Jul 15 '26

Here are enough to keep you busy reading for a good long time.  https://www.themodernbrewhouse.com/list-of-brewing-references/

7

u/brulosopher Jun 22 '26

It’s just beer, dude, chill.