This is directed at Labour members who pay into the party rather than Labour voters (who may be tactical voting, have no other party in their area that aligns with their values, etc). Don’t get me wrong, I support a lot of Labour / Burnham’s platform, but their actions on trans rights have directly killed trans people. How do you square paying into the party with the deaths Labour is causing, rather than joining the Greens or Lib Dems and supporting Labour where strategic to fight Reform / Tories? I am coming from a place of anger and frustration as a trans woman, but I am genuinely curious and want to understand your position more and have a more open dialogue so I can work to understand other perspectives and build a unified Left to fight fascism
Edit as there’s been a lot of questions as how Labour could bare responsibility for the deaths of trans people:
Trans youth suicides spiked after Wes Streeting extended the puberty blocker ban. A trans woman was denied a room in a cancer ward, despite asking for either men or women’s, because she was trans and they didn’t think they could put her in either ward based on Labour’s / EHRC guidance, and she died a preventable death after 16 days waiting for treatment in the hospital. Labour has implemented a new Section 28 (The “Don’t Say Gay” Thatcher era rule for schools) for trans people. Trans friends I know have taken their lives after the Supreme Court ruling, after Labour appointed transphobes to equalities positions, after NHS Wales suspended all gender affirming surgeries in some cases hours before people were scheduled for surgery, and recently with the announcement of NHS segregation, which will cause trans people to be afraid of discrimination and avoid hospitals all together and thus die. Labour has the power to pass basic legislation to respect GRCs, as has been done for over a decade prior to the Supreme Court ruling, yet refuse to do so and actively appoint transphobes to key equalities positions where they have worked to enforce the strictest and most transphobic reading of the Supreme Court ruling