r/MoralityScaling • u/Hro20k • 22h ago

Morality Ranking Morality of exterminating dangerous breeds of an otherwise tamed species?

Post image

Dangerous to people, and not just having a better build/jaw strength etc. And also this particular breed(s) are the only dog breeds to have a lobby protecting them in the west btw

717 Upvotes

87% Upvoted

473 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

10

u/cybersecuritythrow 14h ago

1. https://www.reddit.com/r/MoralityScaling/s/7uqQrELrmg

2. https://www.reddit.com/r/MoralityScaling/s/YNFabuOkVF

3. https://www.reddit.com/r/MoralityScaling/s/QMgMFJQuzT

4. https://www.reddit.com/r/MoralityScaling/s/nFAqRCvF0o

5. https://www.reddit.com/r/MoralityScaling/s/dYOa8YMxrG

-4

u/Sad_Elk1943 13h ago

First one i hit was a study saying the owners are the prob....nothing about black people.....thanks for proving my point

9

u/PitchBlac 13h ago

scroll down further and you’ll see a person making the same style of argument

9

u/cybersecuritythrow 13h ago edited 13h ago

the first one you hit wasn't the... first one?

> Since you seem to like statistics I got a crazy statistic for you regarding race and crime lmao

What comment did you even click

-10

u/Sad_Elk1943 13h ago

It says nothing about race at all....maybe dog breeds.....try having an argument before changing it so u can be butthurt

9

u/cybersecuritythrow 13h ago

what

-4

u/Sad_Elk1943 13h ago

Its pretty simple if ur not delusional

7

u/SWBTSH 13h ago

The very first link is to a comment that says, " Since you seem to like statistics I got a crazy statistic for you regarding race and crime lmao"

-4

u/Sad_Elk1943 13h ago

Why would i read more when the 1st one show them being decietful

6

u/SWBTSH 13h ago

What the fuck are you talking about? The FIRST link shows exactly what they were referring to

3

u/craftygamin 13h ago

What link did you click on?? Cause it most certainly wasn't the first one

0

u/Sad_Elk1943 12h ago

Yea the first one showiing dog owners being the reason that dogs are violent....dosnt say anything about black ppl at all....in the comments either....which proves my point

→ More replies (0)

-4

u/Huntsman077 13h ago

I love how a majority of those comments mention statistics and YOU jumped to black people

4

u/cybersecuritythrow 13h ago

2/5 explicitly mention black people. One of them mentions a "crazy statistic" which is a dog whistle.

The other two liken disapproval of pitbulls to racism, which is my greater point that is a ridiculous assertion.

I can't rub your neurons together for you dude.

-2

u/Huntsman077 13h ago

I love how I said a majority and your response was “well two out of five”… do I need to crack out the old dictionary so you know what majority means?

Also I love how people like you immediately jump to racism, like do you really believe the statics regarding black people and don’t understand why the stats are misleading?

2

u/cybersecuritythrow 13h ago

Racial crime statistics are misleading because humans are incredibly complex individuals impacted by socioeconomic and cultural variables.

It is insulting to compare dog bite injury statistics to that. You are calling me racist, which is just making my point for me in my very own comment thread calling out this ridiculous argument.

0

u/Huntsman077 13h ago

When did I call you racist?

You’re also neglecting the higher rates of exoneration and higher police levels in the communities.

It’s insulting to point out the statics aren’t the full picture?

1

u/cybersecuritythrow 13h ago

Honestly, I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make or what you’re implying. You seem to think I take racial statistics at face value, and that it’s weird for me to think of Black people when someone dogwhistles “crazy racial statistics.”

And yes, I’ll say it again: comparing African American crime statistics to pit bull statistics is insulting. Black people were not bred to be violent. Pit bulls were. Using that comparison to make your point is disgusting.

0

u/Huntsman077 12h ago

Do you want to ban all dogs bred for violence? Also you’re talking about almost two centuries in the past. They were used as farm dogs in the US after they crossed the pound.

My point was those statistics are misleading, and you took them at face value.

1

u/cybersecuritythrow 12h ago

Ban? No. Require comprehensive insurance & licenses, and add additional restrictions? Yes.

Also certain I've clarified twice now to you that racial statistics are not to be taken at face value.

1

u/Huntsman077 11h ago

Then why take the statics for pit bulls at face value, which is what I meant?

1

u/Sad_Elk1943 13h ago

Why would i click more when the first one shows me your being decietful.....sorry im not buying into ur delusion

1

u/Huntsman077 13h ago

I think you replied to the wrong person, but yeah they are being deceitful.

1

u/Sad_Elk1943 13h ago

Yea ur right mybad lol

1

u/cybersecuritythrow 13h ago

it's okay

1

u/Sad_Elk1943 13h ago

Im on mobile and was busy but thnx for being on my side broski

1

u/cybersecuritythrow 13h ago

no excuses needed! it happens

1

u/Huntsman077 13h ago

That’s the person who posted the stats lol, I love how they’re ignoring my response

2

u/Sad_Elk1943 12h ago

Yea they dont want to acknowledge the fact that theyre making shit up soley to be butthurt and get internet points

1

u/cybersecuritythrow 13h ago

i replied to you already good lookin