r/MyKitchenRules • u/ts4184 • 4d ago
*Spoilers* Were not here to cook a chicken schnitzel.
Sad to see them go. I can't deny that I was entertained.
It got me thinking about the costs of these menus. Surely scores should take that into account, scrutinising people that use very high end ingredients vs kitchen staples.
King crab, caviar and pigeon compared to a simple chicken parmi is just such different worlds. Jane and shane probably spent more on the Himalayan pink salt and oil for that confit that the other teams spent on their whole menu!
Id love to see more (successful) higher end cooking on the show but how can you compare two dishes at such wildly different price points.
Edit: to clarify, im saying that its unfair to compare two dishes that use ingredients at such different price points. Its a show about elevating home cooking to restaurant level. It should be about elevating the ingredients not just buying the best of the best.
9
u/Odaptiv 4d ago
I thought she said 'shitzel'.
I have nothing to add to this conversation.
3
2
u/Infamous-Mention-851 3d ago
She did, on purpose, being funny, because Shane laughed. One of her few moments using ‘umour.
2
u/Silver_Morning2263 19h ago
I got a completely different take on that. That schnitzel is so out of their experience that they didn't even know the correct pronunciation and they were scoffing at the very thought. Purely based on their admitted gaps in low end food knowledge.
1
8
u/cottontail20 4d ago
It’s a cooking contest, not a ‘How much money can we spend on this meal contest. So no, they shouldn’t take cost into account. Simple dishes done well should always trump fancy ones done badly.
1
u/ts4184 4d ago
Have I written this post badly? Thats exactly what im saying. If one person is spending $50 and another is spending $500 and the dishes are tied for taste and experience, of course the cheaper one should win.
1
u/Sad-Olive-158 2d ago
I’ll be honest, I misread your post but couldn’t agree more with your sentiments here. Expensive doesn’t mean instantly better. I’ve had some incredible home cooked meals with ingredients from Lidl (I’m in the UK) and some restaurant stuff you can tell is frozen and bagged.
5
u/1Bookworm 4d ago
I actually googled this as they had really expensive ingredients. Apparently they get $1000 per week. From that they use $500 to buy ingredients and decorations. Hoping someone who was on MKR can confirm.
6
u/AtrophiedWives 4d ago
I think there needs to be a better scale for scoring that accounts for difficulty. The bogans’ menu was so basic, very hard to fuck up.
8
u/Ok_Committee8707 4d ago
But isn’t the show supposed to be about good home style cooking ? I know what I’d rather have - although some cream or icecream with the sticky date would have been good.
8
u/Legitimate_Bread_992 4d ago
Yes and even the awakening moment last night “we should have just done meat and 3 veg” umm yeah???
6
u/AtrophiedWives 4d ago
I was wondering what the actual directive given to contestants is and tbh its official description sounds more like home cooks aiming for restaurant quality, not home cooking that you’d see on Come Dine With Me.
"transform an ordinary home into an instant restaurant complete with theme and table decorations for one pressure-cooker night”
3
u/Outside_Ice_9970 4d ago
They made the cream but decided not to put it on the plate as it would melt.
The whole time I was thinking find something to put it in and still serve the cream.
1
u/Silver_Morning2263 19h ago
Yeah - couldn't understand why they didn't just put the cream in a jug or a bowl rather than not at all.
3
u/Jazzlike-Seaweed-612 4d ago
I bet she made him sit in the cuck chair while she stuffed herself with those pigeons
6
u/TheKZA 4d ago
On the other end of it, I can't believe there wasn't more of a penalty for the bogan's square of bog standard sticky date pudding, without even a bit of piped cream or a quenelle of ice cream or something. It should've been marked down massively by just how basic the dish was.
2
u/Legitimate_Bread_992 4d ago
I felt that the bogans got penalised heaps, compared to that gross couple
1
u/Mindless-Student-345 4d ago
Something was off about that whole menu. She tasted an egg and said it was delicious yet smashed up claws which would have leaked moisture in the bottom and on the top and who knows how long sitting it all was would definately make it watery. The pigeons... confit takes a while to cook .. slow.. and then choose to pressure cook. i was confused was it a plug for a product placement like the Adelaide girls having no idea how to use the airfryer and mixer.
1
u/Due_Perspective_2808 3d ago
The steam oven was mentioned many times - how many people just happen to have one of them
1
u/Puskarella 1d ago
The pigeon made no sense. It's such a small bird, and you don't confit whole pigeons or the breasts will turn to leather. You can confit pigeon legs, but the breast should be cooked differently (roasted on crown, or pan fried). They clearly had NO idea what they were doing.
1
1
u/purpletreefrog007 5h ago
The way I look at scoring is like gymnastics- you have a "difficulty" score and an "execution" score. Some teams think expensive ingredients are going to win over the table , but if they're not cooked properly they lose more points from me.
17
u/MelbsGal 4d ago
No, expensive ingredients should not be taken into account if the cooks absolutely butcher them, as Jane and Shane did.
I’d much rather eat a chicken schnitty than dried out pigeon leather.
It’s about skill in cooking, not what your budget is. The unclassy bogans at least served an edible menu even if it was simple fare.