And redditors will still call the UK a great country. While incest and the other thing can be understandable by some, chocking is just the government trying to be a nanny state
I got "thoroughly bodied" earlier today when I mentioned that UK's GDP per capita is less than Mississippi's. They came out with all these BS stats like HDI or whatever.
It would honestly be more scary for me to travel to London than stay home. At least I know here that there aren't roving criminal gangs with butter knives.
"Muh GDP" is one of the most cattle-brained things Americans keep jerking themselves over. Like, congrats, your rich are the richest around. How is that helping your life though?
If only you Britbongs had thought up a majestic organization like ICE to deport said grooming gangs and only if you could carry a gun around to protect you n yours. Hail to the King or whatever hogwash you pathetic American protectorate.
I'm not British, and I think their government is a complete clownshow. I just find it hilarious when Americans goon to their GDP, as if that wealth is actually going into improving quality of life, and not just in the pockets of your corporate overlords.
Average home runs $148,500 in Jackson MS (the state capitol). I found several jobs that I qualify for paying in the $90k+ range. A little too far from my family for my tastes, but that would be a comfortable life. Boring too, but I've been done with going out for a decade plus now.
Yeah, you just keep telling yourself how peachy everything is. That's totally gonna stop the ever accelerating wealth gap, increasing prices and your spiraling quality of life.
there’s a reason why the union jack flag contains both red (auth-left) and blue (auth-right) colours. but not green or yellow or purple (the lib colours)
Alot of things have been banned in the name of lib by people who claim to be libs. You know its Auth, I know its Auth, but the reality is alot of people IRL and on the sub both think they are lib while being very VERY Auth.
"Anyone who disagrees with my liberal policies is a NAZI and deserves to be ridiculed, abused, assaulted, or even murdered!" - God's most liberty and freedom loving lib
Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url.
There’s a very nuanced position from lib left that sex workers / porn workers are real workers to be respected but at the same time often oppressed and anyone using them is supporting oppression, unless the users are women or disabled in which case it’s liberating. God forbid anyone criticise the literal bestiality porn that’s become so prevalent in women’s smut literature.
They are also very pro women dressing slutty/immodestly unless it’s someone they suspect is not lib left doing it (e.g. Sydney Sweeney), at which point it becomes damaging to women.
You can go down the list lib of prominent left issues and see there’s often contradictions and cognitive dissonance if it doesn’t also fit in with their intersectionality views. High profile rape cases (but not if the culprit is a minority), body shaming and misogyny (but not if they’re ‘MAGA’), body objectification in media (but not if it’s men), violence against women (but not if the culprit is a minority), etc.
One thing I found hilarious is LibLeft is supposed to be against body-shaming and judging people by their looks, yet they always call MAGA a version of "fat, ugly old fucks." At least when MAGA makes another AI post of a fat liberal woman crying I expect the body-shaming from them. I just dgaf personally. I'm a fat retard and I'll still call my opposition fat retards because chances are I'm usually right.
Of course naturally, actual cousin marriages are promoted and even encouraged by the NHS, (https://www.bmj.com/content/391/bmj.r2061) because that would be bigoted, wouldn’t it?
Actual incest will remain legal btw, because banning it will upset certain voting demographics.
The nanny state shit is so tiresome. Yeah, the fake stepsister stucking in washing-machine clickbaits were the real problem, THAT was the horrible thing haunting people the most
The fake stepsister stuff is kinda bizarre. We already know that the people aren't actually related, they're actors. But then on top of that, they're pretending to be not actually related.
The entirety of the adult film industry gives me the ick, from pretend incest in most professional studios to the treatment of actors and other staff at those studios.
Not to mention how well shit is categorized on e6 and diversity of the art both style wise and kink wise
I looked it up, "step" and "foster" stuff is banned if one of the actors is pretending to be under 18. Otherwise, it's "parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, brother, sister, half-brother, half-sister, uncle, aunt, nephew or niece," i.e. consanguinity of .25 or above.
Underaged & true incest RP was already so legally dodgy (ie US Supreme Court 'know it when you see it' standard) no company is going to produce it, so that seems like it will basically have no effect on any studio content?
'Help me step brother' is already the cover-your-bases (while getting around the bases) move.
Yeah I was gonna say, if they’re gonna ban incest you gotta kick the royal family to the curb. It’s illegal now, thems the rules they gotta have a loisounce for that.
It is very weird in the United States where cousin marriage is illegal in pretty much most of the country, but two of the biggest holdouts are New York and California.
Actual incest, first cousin marriages that are 99.99% pakifstani muslim are still allowed in the YooKay and are of course putting strain on the NHS and treasury.
I just started Playing Hellraiser Revival and that game includes early on footage of the main character having violent sex with his girlfriend where he chokes her. Is that now going to have to be banned? What about movies that have sex scenes where choking is involved? Do those now need to be edited or banned from UK screens?
I don't watch any kind of porn (not for moral reasons, just no interest), but the idea of a government regulating which kind of fiction is allowed just seems very wrong.
Totally unrelated, but I went on a trip to AZ a while back and apparently they have a separate phub landing page for that state with some fucking weird videos.
I didn't get off but I know how to wash my hands now.
No. It's authright, bro. We all know authright is obsessed with puritan culture and supposed old "traditonalism" that has never really existed the way they imagine it. You don't see authright Christian nationalists banning porn? I mean come on, dude.
Reminds me of when brits banned facesitting(or something) porn then women realized "wait, that affects us too" and staged facesitting protests to bring it back
Real talk though, why the hell does so much porn have weird step- incest shit, random choking or face slapping, or weird shit like spitting in people's mouths?
I have to watch lesbian stuff only because the straight stuff has so much random gross shit or violence.
My cope for the step-incest stuff is that it's just something most people ignore, but it still brings in a small weird group of guys so they still put in there for them.
Poor bastard had dreams of being on the FBI and being like one of the peeps on Criminal Minds, saving people and stopping monsters. Instead, they have to watch you watch fecal porn.
There is two main veins for fetishes: Ones that deal with power, and ones that deal with disgust. Feelings of being powerful or powerless often sexually arouses people. That is where choking, slapping, BDSM, fem dom, and all the other degen shit like that comes from.
Disgust is the other one. Some people are curious and excited by the unknown or the forbidden. That which they know they can't or shouldn't have but still want anyways. This is where the incest, raceplay in the south, gay or lesbian, or the various more disgusting shit with excrement come from.
The fact they are already on the hub to begin with means they already mentally feeling transgressive. So why shouldn't they go further?
The answer to that step/incest question that makes the most sense to me is that it’s an addition to the video that appeals to people with that particular fetish, while also usually being just a minor dialogue thing that people without that fetish can just ignore.
Humans are freaky. Seriously, that's it, that's the answer. We're a bunch of weird, kinky fucks. A lot of the stuff people wanna pretend is way is out there is honestly pretty common.
For a lot of people the appeal of incest porn is just the taboo and not really the incest itself. Also it's easy for producers to just take a regular porn scene and throw in a few lines of dialogue to make it incest, so that's why there's so much of it
The new offences each carry a maximum penalty of five years' imprisonment, for publication.
According to the government, this could include uploading, posting or otherwise making the content available to someone online.
Possession, meanwhile, could include keeping an image stored on a phone, computer or in cloud storage, the government says.
Someone found to be in possession of images depicting sexual activity involving a person pretending to be under 16 could face up to three years' imprisonment, after 6 November.
Those found to be in possession of images depicting strangulation, suffocation or penetrative sexual activity between certain relatives could face up to two years' imprisonment.
But government use these topics as Trojan horses to slip in. It’s not about stopping this porn, it’s about expanding and reinforcing the legal and mechanistic apparatus to observe and record their citizens activities online. It’s not a coincidence that the government that imprisons people for tweets is doing this.
This is the same awkward problem with prosecutors charge stacking pedos.
“Oh when your computer downloaded the image and stored it in cookies when you looked at it? Reproduction charge!
It got synced to your one-drive automatically? Distribution!”
Obviously, nobody wants to be that guy defending pedos so they let it slide, which is fair enough. But when the government gets to wrap their bullshit in that reluctance like a shroud- that reluctance becomes a problem.
“The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all.”
And I'm sure the British government won't make this law super broad so they can basically ban all porn because that is DEFINITELY not something the BRITISH GOVERNMENT would do
Choking is definitely more of a woman thing in my opinion. So many women are into it and I promise you the porn is not the exposure that got them into it.
367
u/p_pio - Centrist 3d ago
How quickly UK has fallen after overthrowing Starmer (real quote btw)