r/Radiation • u/After_Milk386 • 4d ago
Health and Safety Radium applicator update #2
Hey everyone, final post regarding the radium applicator, the authorities have secured the orphan source! No more risk so, but also my collection of radioactive minerals and other objects, I post my latest photos taken with them! Once again, a big thank you for your answers! Other post will follow with some video's of the devices becoming crazy.
Also the final mass of radium is approximately 130uCi!
30
12
u/FallenOne69 4d ago
I lurk on this Sub from time to time and watched this unfold, but I have a few questions. Can someone elaborate on the actual use of this Radium Applicator? Also, why does the applicator appear burnt and dry rotted, is that just as a consequence of the immense radiation?
7
u/Stumpy-Wumpy 4d ago
Far from an expert, but here's my take. It was used in cancer treatments, much like radiation is today, but it was probably a lot less scientific than it is now. Radium in military objects (watches, plane dials etc) sometimes literally burns the glass, or other materials close to it, over decades. Given how damn radioactive this is, I could see it having been slowly burned from the radiation over the decades.
1
u/FallenOne69 3d ago
Crazy, and this was probably sitting in someone’s home or office just laying around for years. Imagine the amount of people that thing harmed.
3
u/Plasticity93 3d ago
This was an era where they made water jugs that would have radioactive material in them to irradiate the water. We are not talking about logical and studied ideas at all. Literal mad scientist stuff. You could rent an X-ray machine to have at a party so your guests could see what their bones looked like. This was a ln era where you could have a surgeon sew goat testicles into you. Heroin(TM) was sold by Bayer corporation in the Sears Robuck Catalog.
https://qz.com/1754133/the-x-ray-craze-of-1896
There was no FDA, no testing, no oversight at all. "Medicine" at that time was weird, wild, and incredibly dangerous.
11
u/No-Style7682 4d ago
Was there contamination from the source?
15
24
u/nininoots 4d ago
I’m very glad you got this sorted. Well done.
6
u/HighTechCorvette 3d ago
They took all his shit, how is that “sorted” and you’re happy for this?
3
u/nininoots 3d ago
Me - Msc in Radiation protection. Nuclear power station accredited HP. 20 years as a first responder to incidents and accidents involving radioactivity and radiation. IAEA TECDOC contributor on radiation accidents. Worked in Russia, UK, Canada, US and Switzerland on various rad waste and accident response projects.
Yes I’m delighted they helped him dispose of this. I expect he/she is too. You should be.
3
u/HighTechCorvette 3d ago
So explain why it needed to be disposed of if it wasn’t leaking. He could have kept it in the box and there wouldn’t be an issue.
4
u/nininoots 3d ago
Ok. I’ll give you my genuine answer….
I’d start by saying just look at it. This isn’t some double lazer welded sealed source capsule, its ~100 year old and completely dilapidated. Just dropping it is likely to break and potentially spread contamination. Its a chunky amount of radium, those doserates are significant.
History shows no matter what good intentions people have eventually theres a loss of control. I’ve attended a scene where theres been a personal stash of radium. The owner was long dead, no one knew what was there. Then some poor fireman happens to discover he’s in a high radiation field during a fire. You can generate significant hazards with items like this, normally for other people.
The legal framework will vary country to country but the core requirements are much the same. Something of this magnitude is large enough to require the set up of a “controlled area” which needs entry and egress controls. The source should be registered with a competent authority who will (amongst many things) keep the emergency services up to date on where sources are in case of fire etc. The source itself should be kept in a fireproof source store with access controls. The source itself needs to be subject to 2 yearly leak test.
I can’t imagine the OP has the capability to do anything of those things and stay the right side of the law. I’d also add most insurance policy for houses and cars have a specific exclusion for radioactive materials in
the T&Cs its highly like they wouldn’t pay out.Finally the keeping it would run counter to the core principles of radiation protection set out by the UN. The core principles are often stated as Justifiable, Optimisation and Limitation. The optimised part is the ALARA/ALARP principle that exposure should be a low as reasonably achievable/practicable. Clear keeping it at home would breach this principle. The justification step is often forgotten, it this case it applies and would be breached. Keeping pokey sources for shits and giggles is no justification.
2
u/HighTechCorvette 3d ago edited 3d ago
You probably wouldn’t approve of my WWII gauge collection. I have some stuff that’s pretty hot, but it’s all in a ventilated display and have made sure there’s nothing leaking contamination. Yes if there’s a fire there will be problems, and if I die someone will have to sell off the collection but there’s always going to be some risk involved in collecting this stuff. At least I know what I’m dealing with as opposed to most of the sellers I bought stuff from, almost everyone on eBay doesn’t realize they have radioactive gauges when they are selling them, just like the antique shop that sold this device. I also believe the radiation hormesis theory makes more sense than ALARA
2
u/nininoots 3d ago
I expect I’d find it fascinating. I have a friend who does the regular leak tests of the RAF’s historic planes. He gets to sit in the cockpit of a Spitfire and wipe test all the gauges. Quite a cool job. The later Spifires had so much radium on the dials the doserate in the seat exceeded 1mSv/h
3
u/HighTechCorvette 3d ago
3
u/nininoots 3d ago
I can see why the thought of someone taking them from you would be alarming. Its quite the collection. Whats the doserate outside the cabinet like?
A practical thought… clearly I’m not going to convince you to give them up… do you have a fireproof sign? The IAEA transport regs call for them. They are widely available and just a piece of engraved steel plate. In my experience fire crews are pretty good at spotting them. It would be an extra safeguard.
1
u/Miserable-Anxiety906 2d ago
Here I'll add my opinion to the mix. I've worked with radium most of my career, have handled and moved Ci's of it using many improvised tools in sketchy situations, and therefore have had my fair share of adventures playing around with it professionally. I've developed mitigation systems, written standard operating procedures, and served as a hazard responder all with regard to systems utilizing Ra-226. Ra-226 is probably the last radioactive thing I'd ever choose keep in my house. The amount of money you need to invest in engineering controls, monitoring, and personnel all just for the sake of Rn mitigation is massive. This is a major reason why any industry involving working with radium is super expensive and cumbersome, it is such a massive pain for companies to manage it that I both could not afford nor would I want to deal with doing it for a hobby. Therefore, seeing people keeps tons of Radium in their house looks really dumb to me. I do think it's super cool, just very dumb.
Companies invest millions of dollars trying to control Rn and there are accidents and leaks constantly, even with He leak checked systems that are under constant surveillance, robust preventative maintenance schedules, and anything else you hope would be happening. The idea that some guy in their house is somehow doing it 'safely' is just silly. The correct reply in these cases, and the one I think you have? Is that you fully understand the risk and just don't care. Which hey fair enough, I also do irresponsible things because I don't care, but I personally don't get doing it for radium and that's my opinion.
1
u/HighTechCorvette 2d ago
I don’t keep any radium in my house. Not sure about Rn mitigation being expensive, a duct fan from the display leading outside and radon monitors seems to work pretty good for me.
1
3d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
5
4
4
u/roberte94066 4d ago
i hope they sent it to a museum and not a secure dump!
5
u/After_Milk386 3d ago
Nope apparently museum have already some piece like that and also it's too radioactive even without the source in
2
3
u/Background_Sleep_863 4d ago
Could you please tell us the whole story? I'm so curious
7
u/Stumpy-Wumpy 4d ago
Look through OP's post history. It was kind of crazy seeing that first post
4
u/Background_Sleep_863 4d ago
I was there for that post but I'm curious as to how they found this, what the shop said, if they knew what they were buying, if there was other stuff, what's in the buckets, what the authorities said, all of that
3
u/HighTechCorvette 3d ago
Should have just kept it and not said anything. 130uCi isn’t that much. All you needed was an alpha detector to make sure there’s no contamination and you’d have been good.
6
u/No_Smell_1748 3d ago edited 2d ago
I told him to delete the original posts as soon as they started to cause a fuss (because it was obviously never going to end well). Massive shame...
1
1
u/HighTechCorvette 3d ago
Depending on where you measure it’s anywhere between 20-100uSv on the glass of the display. I’m in the US, we are legally allowed to own 100 radium gauges, some of these aren’t radium but most are.




29
u/Bob--O--Rama Wiki Contributor 4d ago
They took the rest of your collection too?