We won't know for years to come yet. But it's better than doing nothing.
There's also the fairness of the situation: a person still has to live a life while partly being a science experiment. Some people have noted here that there are too many factors involved in what he's trialling but, to be honest, you'd likely have to be constantly monitored etc. if all of this was on the level of actual, rigorous peer reviewed study.
All of the data he's collecting is publicly available. People are already keeping notes on what he's doing. That's the whole point.
What I was outlining above is that a true science experiment would lock down as many variables as possible. That's kind of impossible to do with the regime he's on. You'd never leave the lab.
1
u/[deleted] Jul 06 '26
[removed] — view removed comment