so what, you can sue companies for their preferences?
I don’t think for a second this is discrimination. it’s her face, it’s their workplace. and yes, a person can be rejected for a position if how they look isn’t appropriate for the job. and looking like a desk isn’t really appropriate.
good job to the person who made the comment. fucking ambulance chaser ofc sues the company, no surprises there.
It’s not discrimination to reject an application for non protected reasons. None of those tattoos are protected. They are not tied to a religion. They are just poor choices.
This is true too, but for some reason many societies consider religious choices to be sacrosanct.
To be fair, though, I'm not aware of any religion that requires people to have face tattoos. But if you're talking about head coverings and the like, then yes, you're right: those really are choices. No one is forcing these people to wear those, unless they live in one of the handful of countries that does.
141
u/Extension-Hornet-131 1d ago
so what, you can sue companies for their preferences?
I don’t think for a second this is discrimination. it’s her face, it’s their workplace. and yes, a person can be rejected for a position if how they look isn’t appropriate for the job. and looking like a desk isn’t really appropriate.
good job to the person who made the comment. fucking ambulance chaser ofc sues the company, no surprises there.