r/Steam • • 4d ago

News Steam for Linux finally goes 64-bit

https://videocardz.com/newz/steam-for-linux-finally-goes-64-bit
3.3k Upvotes

155 comments sorted by

590

u/slenderchamp https://steamcommunity.com/id/slenderben226/ 4d ago

been thinking of installing Linux to try it, perfect opportunity I guess

163

u/TheRealSpanktacular 4d ago

I've been very happy with mint. I do more than gaming and it's a very hassle free distro. I'm kinda over my tinker with every goddam thing phase.

56

u/deadgain 4d ago

I love mint but can we please stop suggesting a LTS based distro for gamers? thx ❤️

42

u/bringbacknyancat 3d ago

I love that everyone disagreeing with this take have specific setups that don't need the latest drivers or has to install the latest drivers themselves. A good majority of people just want things to work and don't want to have to troubleshoot after installing an OS.

14

u/deadgain 3d ago

Yeeeep you can go 20 replies deep and its just idiots missing the point, typical reddit linux users tbh

14

u/TheRealSpanktacular 3d ago

Why? 

It's still infinitely better than win11.

37

u/deadgain 3d ago edited 3d ago

Sure, but by the very definition of LTS it does not come equipped with latest drivers, bells and whistles.

The update schedule for mint is slow by design to promote stability, if you are a retro (*or low end) gamer this might be perfect, but for anyone playing modern games on modern hardware it can potentially introduce issues, see linus's linux challenges videos where he installed a lts version of kubuntu and ran into all sorts of issues

25

u/TheRealSpanktacular 3d ago

Disagree. 

Offering Linux newbies kernel panic in exchange for blue screens of death will only lead them back to the devil they know. 

I play modern games via steam on AMD and a 5070ti and I have none of the problems you describe. 

The only possible alternative to this with which I might agree is bazzite. Otherwise, a stable Linux introduction is crucial to adoption by Windows refugees.

21

u/jahermitt 3d ago

It’s not just modern games it’s new releases often bundled with driver updates. You likely aren’t getting the “best” experience if you’re a version or two behind.

9

u/deadgain 3d ago

Agree to disagree 😁

12

u/violetvoid513 3d ago

Lmao you do not need to be a retro gamer for LTS distros to be good. They only lag 1-2 years behind the newest stuff on drivers and kernel versions, which is completely fine unless your hardware is newer than 1-2 years old.

Mint is going to work perfectly fine for most gamers, and its a great distro. Obviously if you have newer hardware then maybe dont use it, but Mint is not some ancient garbage

10

u/deadgain 3d ago

Exactly, so for modern games and modern hardware, it is in fact not a good choice as you just admitted

I never said it was garbage, I love mint and I reccomend it all the time, just not for gamers! There are better distos

7

u/violetvoid513 3d ago

Modern hardware does not mean 1-2 years recent. I'd say anything in the last several years is modern when it comes to computer hardware. Modern games also work completely fine

For most gamers its completely fine. This notion that gamers are all using the newest hardware and need the newest kernels is simply inaccurate. The relevant question is how new your hardware is, which is independent of whether youre a gamer

4

u/TheRealSpanktacular 3d ago

It's just the usual Linux zealotry demanding that perfect get in the way of good again.

0

u/chretienhandshake 3d ago

Not at all, I have modern hardware, including a 5090, and no issues in Mint. Yes I had to install the nvidia driver by hand, like on windows xp, but that's easy.

5

u/deadgain 3d ago

And thats great for you, you are comfortable going out of the way to fix something that mint does not provide by default. I use mint as a daily driver for work and I love it.

But for normies who dont know an app from a web page this is not ideal.

-1

u/SleepySaturn93 3d ago

I don't think a normie would get a 5090 and a linux distro without knowing what he's getting himself into.

7

u/deadgain 3d ago

You know what they say about assuming

9

u/gmes78 3d ago edited 3d ago

Cinnamon, Mint's desktop environment, feels rather dated. It's also still stuck on X11, which is awful if you want to use any "modern" display features, such as multiple monitors, VRR, HDR, fractional scaling, etc. I think a distro with KDE Plasma would work and feel better for most people.

Additionally, Mint, as an LTS distro, is not great for gaming or general desktop usage, as it receives improvements and bug fixes a couple years after they're released upstream.

Lastly, it's also not good security-wise. I'll copy-paste something I wrote recently:

In the age of LLM vulnerability finding, it is a terrible idea to use LTS distros (that don't actively maintain every single package). Vulnerabilities are found much faster than they are fixed, so timely updates are more important than ever.

~90% of Ubuntu (and thus, Mint) packages are in the universe repo, which isn't maintained by Canonical and doesn't actively receive fixes.

And even if the packages are maintained, LTS is still terribly inefficient for security. It makes it harder to get security fixes, because backporting patches is a ton more work than just upgrading package versions to the latest, and some fixes will slip through the cracks.


Thus, I think Fedora KDE, Bazzite, maybe even the non-LTS release of Kubuntu, are all better options.

11

u/FlowersForHodor 4d ago

Just throwing my +1 for Bazzite in the hat. I made the switch from Windows 11 a few months ago and it has been great.

65

u/Heliomawr 4d ago

i vote fedora

108

u/Summer4Chan 4d ago

Go CachyOS

35

u/kuplet 4d ago

Did CachyOS just outvote Fedora? Within minutes?

45

u/Chetdhtrs12 4d ago

TempleOS is all that really matters

3

u/geekboy_ 4d ago

Oh god haha

6

u/12345myluggage 3d ago

Red Hat isn't what it used to be imho. Their acquisition by IBM and subsequent actions have soured certain people on them.

12

u/slenderchamp https://steamcommunity.com/id/slenderben226/ 4d ago

Yeah I was gonna go with cachy

8

u/SSSl1k 3d ago

Anecdotal experience, but I would not recommend CachyOS if using it for a living room/TV computer. My Nvidia Shield would constantly fight to take control over my PC, and I would need to smash the 'Game' button on my remote to ensure that it stays on my PC for 1-2 minutes to ensure it stays there. Figured it was a Linux quirk, and just went about my day for the past 1-2 years.

Downloaded Fedora on it for fun, and not only does that issue never happen anymore, it also wakes up perfectly from sleep, whereas before I would have to turn on and off my PC so that visuals would pop-up on the TV.

5

u/SnoySnapperz 4d ago

Havent tried CachyOS myself, why would you recommend it over Fedora? Is it known to be as pain less?

18

u/Miguellite 4d ago edited 3d ago

CachyOS has been just working without any interference from my side. I distro hopped a bit, stayed a few months with mint, ubuntu, kubuntu, bazzite for a few weeks, then fedora and CachyOS has been the most pleasant*. It might just be that I have an nvidia GPU and CachyOS has been the most stable in that regard.

5

u/MushroomSaute 3d ago

+1 for the mention of NVIDIA on CachyOS. It's like all the warnings about NVIDIA's Linux support just disappeared when I switched to that distro, since the Cachy maintainer(s?) seem very invested in keeping the official NVIDIA drivers updated.

19

u/Dem0lari 4d ago

As a complete newbie to linux and anything linux mumbo jumbo related, I am happy with CachyOS.

3

u/MushroomSaute 3d ago edited 3d ago

I've been hesitant to recommend any Arch-based distro to people who are 'newbie' or non-technical, just because things are perhaps a little more likely to break than on a distro with official releases, so it's cool to see Linux newbies are having a good time with it!

How long have you had it, and how frequently do you update (and with pacman or the included app store/discover/shelly/etc.)? Have you had to do much troubleshooting on anything with the OS or has it just worked?

1

u/Dem0lari 2d ago

I've had it for around 2 months now, I think.
I update it everytime I turn my pc off, before going to bed.
If I don't know something I either look for it or ask one of the LLMs available. GPT was able to help me understand some of the basics and resolve maybe 2 issues I had when I tried typical windows stuff on linux and it didn't want to work.
Other than than, most of things just works and I didn't have any problems. Yet.
I mainly play games so I was worried about that. But with steam launching everything via vulkan games work fine. Even Helldivers 2 that I expected to just refuse, because of the anti cheat works fine. Am slightly pissy about the loading times though.
I am hopeful about this OS and future will tell if other programs like Clip Studio Pain will work too, but if anything, there is solutions and ways to make everything run.

6

u/MushroomSaute 3d ago edited 3d ago

Although it's maybe my favorite distro, I wouldn't blindly recommend CachyOS. If you're technical, or at least open to troubleshooting things that break or don't work (not that it happens that much these days), I'd recommend it for sure. But if you want confidence that an update isn't going to mess things up, Fedora is the way I'd go.

The main, important difference between the two is that Fedora has actual releases, which means the packages/applications you install are sequestered into the repository for that Fedora version, and much likelier to be compatible with everything else, and all other dependencies present in the repos too.

Arch (and Arch-based distros like CachyOS), being "rolling release", has no OS version. You just have whatever packages you install, from whatever repos you have installed, which are not divided into OS versions. So, plenty of those packages are incompatible, some are missing without installing other repos, and so on. If you're installing only packages that are maintained and in the included repos, it's not a big deal, but sometimes it can cause issues for legacy or older software that is in the repo, whose dependencies might be missing or incompatible with other packages. Again, no issue if you're technical enough to troubleshoot if it happens, but it is a factor I'd make my recommendation based on.

The benefit is that Arch/Cachy are more bleeding edge and up-to-date, and CachyOS is especially good about keeping the NVIDIA drivers updated if that's the GPU you have. CachyOS also has the benefit of including repos compiled for your hardware, which can offer very minor performance improvements over generic/universal packages. But if you don't absolutely need or want the newest drivers, updated packages, or marginal performance boosts, Fedora is absolutely fine and quite popular and reliable.

3

u/CatatonicMan 3d ago

The one thing I'll add is that rolling release reliability is much less of a concern with bootable BTRFS snapshots.

If anything breaks - either by me doing something stupid or by a bad update - rolling back to a previous good state is a task of a few minutes.

2

u/I-Want-A-Username- Hot and Steamy 3d ago

1+ this, I always recommend cachy if someone uses Nvidia, as it seems more stable than other distros, but for me bazzite is my go to on my main, as I found a lot of programs I use are on bazzite that i need to/for work, and the only two things that put me off cachy from being on my main, is that you need a online connection for it to be installed, and that steam is a separate package download that comes with a bunch of other stuff that I don't need, feels to bloatful, but other than that I 1+ cachy for Nvidia :)

5

u/Squashyhex 3d ago

My reason for going CachyOS was because as an arch based system, I figured it would be closest to a SteamOS experience without actually using SteamOS. I've been pretty happy with it so far, and given it's polling as the most popular linux system for September in Steam's hardware survey, it's clearly doing something right!

4

u/CatatonicMan 3d ago

I'd put Bazzite with KDE as closer to a default SteamOS experience. Same desktop, both are immutable, and both install apps primarily via Flatpack.

2

u/Squashyhex 3d ago

CachyOS is also KDE by default tbf, but I'll concede on the immutability and go to installer. I just didn't want an immutable system 🙂

1

u/Candid-Change-4051 3d ago

Started on Mint to Fedora to Nobara then finally Cachy as my daily driver. Maybe I have been lucky but aside from a minor pre-7.0 issue with Bluetooth disconnects and some audio issues, it’s been smooth (and very fast sailing). All AMD system with 9070XT and 9950X3D.

2

u/WindFreaker 3d ago

Stop recommended anything Arch-based to beginners. 9 times out of 10 they will be frustrated and give up before the end of the week.

-4

u/HuntKey2603 I remember Ricochet 4d ago

nah AUR scary

1

u/Soma_azus 3d ago

It is a misconception that using CachyOS means you have to get your packages from AUR. Most of the users can continue using CachyOS without needing to install anything from AUR.

I have been using it for 2 years now and I never needed AUR.

24

u/SnoySnapperz 4d ago

Have tried a bunch of distros, and Fedora actually just works. Its a nice feeling

7

u/Pokimaru-yama 4d ago

That's what I started using on dual boot, gaming just works out of the box.

Edit: I used KDE Plasma as my desktop environment, it's closer to Windows visually, but there are other window environmnents.

6

u/ksheep 4d ago

Been using Fedora w/ KDE Plasma for a few years now on my gaming rig and it's been great. Decided to switch over after seeing how well the Steam Deck handled things and getting sick and tired of all the BS in Windows.

3

u/MrAnonymousTheThird 4d ago

I installed fedora gnome on my laptop I haven’t looked back since. Gnome has the philosophy that less is more. No clutter. First class touchpad gestures

1

u/Heliomawr 4d ago

this is why i chose to stay with fedora workstation for my laptop. Its so incredibly intuitive.

2

u/setibeings 4d ago

As a long time arch user, I fully agree. 

2

u/WrongdoerIll5187 3d ago

Bazzite is great and based on Fedora. But without the ability to fuck it up

1

u/Zugas 3d ago

Fedora with GNOME desktop is just wonderful.

1

u/OhBuggery 4d ago

i use arch :3

10

u/Sagemel 4d ago

If you’re used to Windows start with Bazzite

13

u/shiddedandfarded69 4d ago

Just be aware that Bazzite is pretty locked down. But as a Windows user you should feel right at home.

12

u/SinAkunin 4d ago

Yes and no. Flatpaks are easily installed through bazaar and you of course have .appimages. additionally, you can relatively easily create a container which then hosts more intricate system alterations. Installing a different driver can be a hassle though, but most of Bazzite works out of the box.

7

u/shiddedandfarded69 4d ago

It definitely works out of the box. It works beautifully out of the box with most hardware. I just meant it's locked down because it's an immutable distro is all.

3

u/gmes78 3d ago

It isn't. It's just that the way you install things is different.

3

u/Vox___Rationis 4d ago

These limitations are why I prefer Nobara.
Just like Bazzite, Nobara is Fedora-based, gaming focused distro, unlike Bazzite it is not locked down (not immutable, not atomic.)
Nobara is made and maintained by GloriousEggroll (who is the author of ProtonGE, a popular fork of Proton), so I can rely on it being up to date with new gaming-related developments.

When I tried Bazzite the first time I tried to install a necessary program using terminal it started saying something like "We do not do things this way here". Don't remember the details any more, I think I was able to overcome that, but the friction being there at all made me look elsewhere.

7

u/shiddedandfarded69 3d ago

Oh you probably tried to install something with rpm. You can use rpm-ostree with Bazzite and other atomic Fedora distros instead, but Bazzite always gives you a message that it's "discouraged to use".

2

u/geekboy_ 4d ago

I’ve heard a lot of people that like that. I myself am using Windows 11 right now and I may throw in another SSD in my computer just to try dual booting or maybe I’ll try a VM for a bit

4

u/nvoima 3d ago edited 2d ago

VM is a good idea for testing various distros and flavors to find the one that feels best for you, before installing on a physical drive to unleash the power.

Edit: Damn, I made Linux sound like dating and marriage, but fortunately computers are a lot simpler than people. Happy gaming y'all!

1

u/geekboy_ 3d ago

I’ve thought about doing some VMs just for that reason. Trying bazzite and some other ones

3

u/Kazko25 4d ago

People here are suggesting a bunch of other OS, but honestly? If you want to try SteamOS, go for it! I’m a big fan of it myself, they keep improving it, and if you want to use it for gaming it’s fantastic. They also recently added a feature where you can have it default to desktop mode instead of gaming mode as well.

5

u/CatatonicMan 3d ago

I believe you still need AMD/Intel hardware for Steam OS, so for those who have Nvidia (i.e., most people) it's not really an option.

1

u/Thrusher666 3d ago

If you have distro that support Nvidia, performance hit is not worth it at all.

2

u/slenderchamp https://steamcommunity.com/id/slenderben226/ 3d ago

I'll probably try it at some point, but for now I'm gonna go with cachy

1

u/ThoseThingsAreWeird 3d ago

If you want to try SteamOS, go for it!

What's the best way to just try it? Pop it on a suitably large USB stick and boot from there for a while?

1

u/Adezar 3d ago

My sons both switched to Mint with their latest PC builds (instead of going to Windows 11) and have been very happy.

1

u/runnerofshadows 3d ago

I recommend fedora kde. It felt a lot like peak windows 7 out of the box. Just remember to enable third party repos by clicking the button.

There's also rpmfusion but that's more for once you are used to things.

1

u/zfgf-11 3d ago

Fedora + KDE !! Just kidding, try some out and install the one you like most. Not Ubuntu though

1

u/Inator-Maker 3d ago

I made the switch to Bazzite last year and haven't looked back. I found for my needs and configuration it was the best option that I tested. I no longer want to tinker and spend my time solving problems. I want to sit down and just play my games which Bazzite gave me. Every distro has pros can cons so if you do want to give it a try I would recommend testing driving a few distro and seeing which one gives you what you want before spending a lot of time getting your machine just the way you like it only to find something that irks you.

1

u/Aildari 3d ago

I've been using opensuse tumbleweed for about 2 years now. I use amd graphics and no drivers needed. Just install the os, steam and get to playing. For a rolling distro it's been pretty trouble free.

373

u/Altinvfinance 4d ago

this is bigger than it sounds. ubuntu tried to drop 32-bit libraries back in 2019 and had to walk it back mostly because steam still needed them. if the client is fully 64-bit now, distros can finally start cleaning that up, though older games will still need the 32-bit runtime for a while

77

u/[deleted] 4d ago edited 10h ago

[deleted]

16

u/LordXamon 3d ago

That's a cool as hell name for a process. What does it do?

28

u/CremePuffBandit 3d ago

It starts up when you open a game and tracks any child processes the game makes, basically extra little scrips separate from the main program. Then when you close the game, it kills any strays that didn't automatically shut down.

8

u/RockAndGames 3d ago

That's metal

150

u/Entegy 4d ago

The only company that had the power to force 32-bit's retirement is Apple. Many pre-microtransaction games were lost to that transition though. Everyone else needs to keep 32-bit around for much longer.

69

u/Loudergood 3d ago

I'm still amazed Microsoft managed to retire 16bit

43

u/raw_dogger222 3d ago

Most 16 bit software was from the 3.1 days before Windows really exploded, so it's a lot easier to sunset than 32 bit

5

u/Sunlit_Neko 2d ago

I hate that apple did that. I used a MacBook in high school and kept it on the older macos to keep running steam. I might have actually stayed a Mac user if they didn't axe so many apps.

15

u/Cley_Faye 3d ago

Tons of game still require 32-bit runtime, and are unlikely to change because they're no longer maintained. There is little to no cost, aside some storage, in keeping both 32 and 64bit available anyway.

Up until recently (well, a few months ago at this point), a 32-bit windows games running under proton required 32-bit support libraries for graphic drivers on the host system, which was an issue because for the 24.04 version of the build, ubuntu forgot to include these libraries in the nvidia package. Had to roll back to a previous driver, and then skip the broken one to get a newer version that did include the missing libraries.

I'd rather keep using a few MB of disk space than break half the games that are more than a decade old or so.

3

u/cybekRT 3d ago

It's not only storage. It's maintenance and tests and spending time to make sure nothing breaks. And after that, there is a huge cost of the hardware required to still support 32bit, silicon used on the cpu.

6

u/Damglador 3d ago

Pure 64bit systems are unsupported

107

u/Escalope-Nixiews 4d ago

Gentoo users in joy

87

u/britaliope 4d ago

YES !

i will finally be able to get rid of all those package.use annoying rules

Edit: NOOOOOO :'(

However, the move to 64-bit does not mean Linux users can remove their 32-bit libraries. Valve’s updated requirements explicitly state that 64-bit-only installations are not supported. Systems must still provide both 32-bit and 64-bit libraries and graphics drivers, including multilib support. The new client also requires Linux kernel 5.6 or newer and glibc 2.31 or newer.

33

u/Valen7789 4d ago

Ofc 32bit still needed... There are many 32bit games

12

u/zepherth 4d ago

No one even likes the 16-bit games anymore 🥲

4

u/Escalope-Nixiews 3d ago

Wine can run them, not a prob

3

u/cybekRT 3d ago

We prefer to sandbox them using DOSBox :P

2

u/Mastbubbles_conner 3d ago

Gentoo users be like: "Welcome to the future, now back to our source!"

103

u/ledow 4d ago

Barely makes any difference whatsoever. It's not like the Steam CLIENT is pulling more than 4GB or processing a ton of data rapidly.

Even the in-Steam browser is a 64-bit process already.

37

u/Mikumiku_Dance 3d ago

it makes a big difference for distros looking to drop 32 bit libraries. Steam support was one of the last things blocking it

10

u/GoogleDisDick 3d ago

Which this won't do because it still has 32-bit components and 32-bit native Linux games still rely on those libraries.

3

u/ninjadev64 2d ago

Those run in the Steam Linux Runtime which should provide those libraries. The only things remaining that the distro has to package are the 32-bit graphics drivers.

3

u/fdrtom 3d ago

Agreed, some wonderful people made great installer packages for a lot of distros (I'm using arch btw) so it's just install steam and log in

3

u/Masterflitzer 3d ago

but now you don't need to install the 32bit libs, multi arch is annoying

1

u/No_Job_3236_R 2d ago

Yes you do. Read the article.

16

u/r_search12013 4d ago

iirc it was the only piece of software on my linuxes in the last few years that still needed 32bit.. so this would be really quite a pleasant upgrade :)

3

u/Cley_Faye 3d ago

Unless you play games. The switch to using 64bit build as the default is not as old as many people think.

3

u/r_search12013 3d ago

well.. I did have an n64? :D that's also not as recent as I'd like to believe :D

these days I mostly play games that happen to have dedicated linux clients, too .. not like I sought them out that actively, it just seems to coincide with my particular brand of nerd-feel :D

4

u/TheDragonSlayingCat 3d ago

The dirty little secret of the N64 is that, while the console really did have a 64-bit CPU, the majority of games released for the console ran in 32-bit mode.

1

u/r_search12013 3d ago

that's what I noticed years later in emulating too.. but still, the technology existed, it just wasn't widely adopted .. that's just the same way the upgrade from 16 to 32 bit went .. sloooowly :D
in my experience, transitioning 32 to 64 was a lot smoother and faster, probably because it had been done before..
and eventually I noticed that I had nothing 32 bit remaining .. until the inevitable steam install on each system anew :D

2

u/Cley_Faye 3d ago

Well, running games from another platform through emulation or recompilation is kinda cheating :)

Phoenotopia: Awakening, released in 2021, is a 32bit game. Granted, it is not a native linux game. Game with full linux support on Steam are likely to have 64bit build, if only because they're likely to be more recent. But that's not a guarantee either. If you get your hands on a 32-bit build of a game, and the publisher/dev is not going to push a 64-bit build, you'd be out of luck running it on a system with no 32-bit support libraries.

1

u/r_search12013 3d ago

of course .. but, as long as steam has 32 bit with it it's much harder to have a pure 64bit system .. it increases choice .. not doing it will definitely not progress anything, it's a strange argument for argument's sake to say deprecated things will stay the software they are, isn't it?

0

u/Cley_Faye 3d ago

it's a strange argument for argument's sake to say deprecated things will stay the software they are, isn't it?

Not really, since it's a truth. If you keep moving forward without thinking about how to keep backward compatibility, you lose things. And if there is little upside in moving forward, you lose thing with little benefits.

Unless we agree that "oh well, from now on 20 years of game will disappear, that's just how it is", it is pointless to aim at a 64bit "exclusive" system. Especially if we look at the bigger picture, where 32 vs 64 is only one part of the issue; you have to consider architecture too. x86-64 might not be the target in a few years, hence the work in place to keep the game built for it running on other architecture (like ARM).

All I'm saying is, chasing a 64bit exclusive system today, without a solution to run legacy software, is willingly asking to put a fair share of games down definitively without much gain aside from saving a bit of disk space for most people.

3

u/AutoCockerPB 3d ago

Should have happened sooner. 2015 is when it should have been the end. Windows 11 is what mostly killed it for windows

1

u/Cley_Faye 3d ago

It's not killed on windows though. WoW64 is exactly that: the whole system library as 32bit variants. That's how you can still run 32 bit windows applications.

1

u/MrHoboSquadron 3d ago

It still requires 32-bit libs for 32-bit linux games.

1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/r_search12013 3d ago

legacy libraries no one really cares to maintain anymore? .. various exploits found in everyday ancient software like curl and such?
I suspect 32bit steam would be a very good hacking target for whoever has a particular exploit in mind that targets gamers

15

u/Aggressive_Bad_7344 3d ago

You still need to install the 32-bit libs so you can't rejoice.

26

u/c00kieRaptor 4d ago

What? It wasn't already 64-bit??

3

u/your_mind_aches 74 3d ago

Famously, no. You know how when you go to check game files or find a directory for a mod, you goes into the "Program Files (x86)" folder? Yeah.

8

u/HuntKey2603 I remember Ricochet 4d ago

i mean, not a high priority when most games are 32 bits

12

u/Orange_Tang 3d ago

It's 2026, 32bit software hasn't been the standard in over a decade. The transition started in the windows XP era.

19

u/Damglador 3d ago

Well, weren't not in 2015, most games are no longer 32bit.

I think it's more of why bother if it doesn't make a difference for the user.

6

u/CrazyIronMyth 3d ago

even the mmos from 2005 i play are 64-bit now

2

u/cybekRT 3d ago

Unfortunately, games use more than 4GB of memory, so they have to be 64bit.

17

u/BeepIsla 3d ago

Funny the Windows client got 64-bit before the Linux client.

With Valves games it was the other way around, CSGO was 32-bit on Windows for all its life but Linux was 64-bit for many many years.

5

u/4r73m190r0s 3d ago

Can I play CS:GO and Quake on Linux?

7

u/iDaddyDirection 3d ago edited 3d ago

All Valve games can be played on Linux without issue. Quake also works on Linux.

Edit: fixed a misspelling of Quake, lol

7

u/Kalnb 3d ago

what a time we live in where we can run oats on our computer

3

u/BobCorndog 3d ago

This is a time oat

1

u/Crashman09 3d ago

It oat to be enough

1

u/kitestar 3d ago

Mmmmm oatmeal

1

u/iDaddyDirection 3d ago

It took me way too long to realize this was a response to Quake being spelled wrong, lol.

2

u/Taste_My_Noodle 3d ago

I’ve been running every game on cachyos without an issue.

2

u/4r73m190r0s 3d ago

So, there is translation layer from Win syscalls to Linix ones?

4

u/Taste_My_Noodle 3d ago

All the proton and wine translation layers are contained in a “gaming pack” you can install on first bootup along with Nvidia drivers if that’s what you use. They did a really good job

1

u/jarzebowsky 2d ago

Protondb.com

4

u/-Balcika 3d ago

Share this to Bringus studios

5

u/Postiez 3d ago edited 3d ago

I went with endevouros and ended up switching to cachy kernel and mirrors. This is by far the best OS experience I have ever had and I have been using everything since Windows 95.

If anyone feels intimidated by making the switch, everything is super well documented so it's actually a great use case for LLMs to help you through any process you need.

5

u/fmccloud 3d ago

Say what you will about LLMs and AI, but it helped me get deeper in the Linux rabbit hole by using Docker on my NAS. It's great for stuff like this, especially if you need to use a command line and aren't familiar with it like me.

3

u/DerpWyvern 3d ago

many people hate Ai just for the sake of it. this is actually one of the best uses for Ai, it helped me recover my system multiple times and i learned a lot from it

3

u/CelebrationOwn3414 3d ago

There is official tutorial on Cachy website how to convert arch based linux into CachyOs. Highly recommend it.

2

u/Hanna_Bjorn 4d ago

Sounds like a perfect time for another distro hop

1

u/SheActuallyFarts 3d ago

Absolutely brilliant mate

1

u/analyticattack 3d ago

Psh. Not worth it until 128-bit!

1

u/RadimentriX 3d ago

Does that change or improve anything on the steam deck?

11

u/capitan_turtle 3d ago

It will free up like a megabyte of disk space

5

u/MrBlueA 3d ago

In today's economy that's more money than you expect

1

u/barelyangry 3d ago

We need an ISO for the PS5.

1

u/NomadFH 1d ago

Will this finally allow it to become wayland native so nvidia can stop being so shit with it?

-19

u/Aimless115 4d ago

This obsession to ditch 32 bits is ridiculous

16

u/jafinn 4d ago

64-bits started becoming mainstream some 20 years ago. So it feels more like a "eh, maybe we'll get to it one day" rather than an obsession.

5

u/BeepIsla 3d ago edited 3d ago

I hate 32-bit with a passion as a game modder. Looking at you Windows calling conventions. 64-bit makes my life so much easier.

8

u/Eorlas 3d ago

The fuck is this comment…

0

u/Cley_Faye 3d ago

There is little gain in trying to remove all 32 bit dependencies, and an enormous cost. Any old software that isn't maintained anymore is dead, for example.

Unless someone develops a 32-to-64 bit bridge that can make 32bit software run on a fully exclusive 64bit software stack, there's a big downside to it.

And it's not that easy; calling convention, data conversion, sheer availability, and so on, makes this not that easy.

We'd be losing a lot for the gain of a few MB of storage. That makes this a weird hill to die on.

-14

u/bdu-komrad PC and Steam Deck 4d ago

A couple of people are really happy to hear this news.