r/TDLH • • May 04 '24

Art Great Palace Library project (Minecraft; 180 hours work so far -- facade/frontal screenshot) (Mixed 1930s German and Egyptian styles, within a sci-fi setting of the year 2463. I'll offer more details in the future.)

Post image
2 Upvotes

r/TDLH • • 1d ago

The Galvion Chronicles — Episode 4: The Fractured Moon

Post image
0 Upvotes

🚀 The Galvion Chronicles — Episode 4: The Fractured Moon 🌕🔥

Clay and Draylah crash-land on a shattered moon, where they face a terrifying one-eyed Cyclops in a desperate fight for survival.

But amid the danger, an unexpected connection begins.

This is Episode 4 of my original science-fiction series, developed from my feature-film screenplay and brought to life through illustrated storytelling and AI-assisted animation.

I'd love to hear your thoughts on the story, characters, and visuals!

🎬 Watch the series on YouTube: The Galvion Chronicles.

What do you think of the concept?


r/TDLH • • 5d ago

The Galvion Chronicles-- Episode 3 – The Deadly Trials

Thumbnail
youtube.com
0 Upvotes

What does it take to become a Space Ranger?

In The Galvion Chronicles: Episode 3 – The Deadly Trials, young Clay Butler faces dangerous trials, alien rivals, and challenges that will test his courage and determination.

This is an original science-fiction adventure told through cinematic narration and AI-assisted visuals.

Episode 3 offers a glimpse into the larger universe I'm building.

New to the series? You can start with Episode 1 on my YouTube channel.


r/TDLH • • 11d ago

Big-Brain The REAL Reason Malfoid is Trending

2 Upvotes

I want to start this by saying that I’m not the BIGGEST Harry Potter fan, but I was absolutely in love with the first two books, and EVERY piece of media that surrounded them. What changed was how JK Rowling entered a state of depression, made Prisoner of Azkaban, and this had the idea that the audience was growing up and becoming angsty teens along with the characters. The movies started to have washed out colors and spells were starting to be used like guns for a wizard war. I tried to binge watch the movies after Prisoner of Azkaban on a recent flight, because I’ve never seen them before, and they became a wash of grey and stupidity in my memory.

But, of course, it’s not like the fandom cares about any of that.

It’s not like the fandom cares deeply about Snape revealed to be in love with Harry’s mom or how Fred and Crabbe died around the Room of Requirements for different reasons, or Ginny Weasley being the wife of Harry once it’s all over. These are things Rowling put into the story as a middle finger to every fan making fanfiction, as well as the massive retcons like Dumbledore being gay AND the tombstones of wizards having biblical scripture on them. I mention all of this because the fans of Harry Potter started out as little kids finding witches and wizards as both cute and something to roleplay. Grab a stick, say a silly word, and you’re a wizard. Pick one of four colors for your scarf and robe, now you’re part of a Hogwarts house.

The point of Harry Potter is to have a fashion statement for kids, which becomes a choice for halloween, and a choice for playground activities. It’s not like the story itself matters deeply or doesn’t matter at all, but it’s irrelevant when it comes to its cultural impact. The reason there are so many fanfics is because people want their own story in the world, rather than a reimagining of the story itself.

Now, you might be wondering “What does any of this have to do with the Malfoid meme?”

Recently, someone drew an image of Draco Malfoy as a girl and it became famous overnight because it unlocked a mass realization: the feminist author of the books has practically all of her characters female coded. As much as tumblerinas want to talk about “men writing women”, Rowling is the perfect example of “women writing men”. The main villain himself, Voldemort, is only seen as a villain because he is a hypocritical race supremacist who was born to a human father, later to be orphaned and developing violent habits from a lack of a family structure. But his attachment of “supremacy” was through his witch mother, Merope.

For those of you who don’t know, Rowling is a radical feminist, who places the female subject at the center of everything. And before she was canceled by the radical progressives, she tried to do the whole “I have gay characters” thing, which showed that she doesn’t care about the world or story that she made. She only cared about how these things made her look in the eyes of the fans, and she wanted to keep as many fans as she could so that they buy the merchandise as a fashion statement. And these fans were mostly women and gay men who developed an obsession with magic and were usually part of Wiccan culture.

Wiccan culture has become so ridiculous that the movie The Craft is used as an initiation rite between groups of girls, introducing them to witchcraft, which usually leads to an obsession with energy crystals and zodiacs. For the most part, it’s yet another fashion statement that ties into someone’s lifestyle, but it also starts to show the weird habits people start to develop when they’re clinically online.

Kids are no longer trying to find a group of friends that are normal. They are trying to find a group of friends that are their flavor of weird, or at least a flavor that they can stand tasting every day.

Many people try to explain the Malfoid phenomena as a WHAT. They will tell you what it is or what it ties to with the changes. That now the enemies to lovers trope can be activated, the bully becomes the babe by the end, and the final scenes can be more powerful by having Voldemort defeated by Malfoid and Potter using a wand together to symbolize love. That now the two houses can end their rivalry when they get married, due to opposites attracting. Pick any scene with these two characters and it gets better when you know there’s a romantic interest looming in the shadows.

The problem is that this is a WHAT, not a WHY.

If I asked you WHY a painting was up on a wall, and you explained to me what the painting signified and what its details are, you still wouldn’t be telling me WHY it’s hung up on the wall or how it got there. This is a constant problem under postmodernism because they focus on subjectivity, forcing them to never even consider the why to anything. This brings up the main question: WHY is Malfoid so popular?

Malfoid has nothing to do with the actual Harry Potter property. Instead, there is a value in anything that is already popular and well known, with online activity forced to push anything big forward even further. If you already knew what a Harry Potter was, you would share the idea of Malfoy being a girl because she’s attractive and it’s a different thing from the original form. The realizations of the story changing was something fanfic writers put on the table long after, and the trendy nature unlocked an urge for people to make up different scenes that are already from the books. Not to sound snooty, but this trend exploded because people wanted attention and also wanted to put down minimal effort.

Some of these fanfics are good, while most of them are AI garbage that takes the actual books and just adds sexual tension to any Malfoy scene. Many are even having their Royalroad stories deleted by the site because of how much it copies from the actual books. Some might see this as a normal day in fanfiction scrutiny, but I don’t remember things being this lazy when Harry Potter fanfics were at their peak. I also didn’t see this when laughing at all of the slash fiction where it would be Harry and male Draco being gay with each other. That last sentence might cause some confusion for a lot of you.

Due to the original fanbase of Harry Potter being mostly women, this led to a huge slew of slash fiction, aka male on male action, concerning any of the pairings the writer wanted to stan for. And because of the Polyjuice potion used in the second movie, some of these would have Draco turn into a girl as a way to “be his true self”. For a while, there were a lot of “boy turns into girl” stories from these fanfics, until JK Rowling was canceled in 2020. Up until then, Rowling fought hard to act as if she was never a TERF, to even have her spokesperson say she "accidentally" liked an anti-trans tweet in 2018. So for a little over 20 years, we had the radical left full speed ahead with HP fanfiction, and for only about the last 6 years they have deemed it taboo.

Not to sound dramatic, but 2020 is when Harry Potter became a battleground for the culture war. Due to lockdowns, more people became clinically online, and we had Fantastic Beasts 3 come out in 2022, which has done the worst in the box office out of all of the Wizarding World movies. It still made crazy profit, but don’t you think it’s a bit odd that Rowling gets canceled and then the following movie does the worst? Things became worse from there when Hogwarts: Legacy tried to spin the narrative and made sure everyone knew Rowling HAD NOTHING TO DO with the game, and it still became a point of cancellation and controversy.

The new HBO series, where Snape is black, is meant to be the world’s biggest spit in the face of the author that started it all.

Now, this is where things get interesting because consider the following question: how does Snape’s skin color change the story? The only thing is that Snape gets hung upside-down from a tree by Harry’s father and Sirius Black, which the radical left will see as racially motivated, even though it had nothing to do with race. This attempt to anger the author with race is why the reaction was to change the sex of a rival. Rather than making the story worse, it makes the story better, and this becomes a spit in the face of the HBO showrunners. It’s to show that changes can always be made for the better, and the radical left will never return to the fashion statement after they burned every bridge.

Sadly, this resulted in tons of people who never read the books or seen the movies try to hop onto the bandwagon. Many even accused the trend of a psy-op that tried to get them to watch the movies for the first time. And don’t get me started on the amount of people claiming they’re going to “apply Malfoid to their own stories” as an attempt to capitalize on the trend that is going to die off before their project is even out. For now, what we get are a lot of fanfiction snippets, a lot of drawings, and I believe a mod for Hogwarts: Legacy is being made to add a Malfoid. But all of these new books coming out will all miss the mark and miss the point, because they don’t know why this is trending at all.

If you believe the power is behind the concept of a girl struggling to express her feelings, so she bullies the main character, then this would have made Hey Arnold a huge sensation with how Helga treated Arnold.

If you believe it’s the posh aristocratic character looking down upon the male protagonist, then Mitsuru would have been deemed best girl of Persona 3 and the rest of the series.

If you believe it’s the idea of a girl with blonde hair and silver eyes, well, this would have been realized long ago and it wouldn’t be a trend to begin with.

What we have are clinically online people battling with other clinically online people, thinking they’re going to win the lottery by assuming this trend will attach to their own personal projects. They all think they’ll be the next Harry Potter, and we haven’t had one in over 20 years. Yes, a Twilight will have a fanfic become a 50 Shades of Grey later on in life, but Harry Potter will always have something like Fourth Wing or Alchemized. Granted, Fourth Wing was never "officially" deemed a fanfic, but… come on. A magic school with dragons and the four quadrants, and we’re not supposed to think this was inspired by Harry Potter at all?

And don’t get me wrong: I encourage people to ride the waves and strike the iron while it’s hot. If you have a fanfic, release it! If you were inspired by the meme to do something of your own, totally make it! The meme actually revived an old concept I was working on, but this was more like a magic girl harem thing that I am still not sure what to do with. Now I totally have my “sixth ranger” who works with the bad guys, and it’s pretty funny how the colors for Malfoid are also green like the Green Ranger.

However, you’re simply not going to make a dent in the culture war by trying any of this. It’s liberals fighting progressives and both of them are grifters trying to sell garbage. Instead of the next Harry Potter, you will get the next Alchemized, but for white zoomer males, written by someone who’s never been with a woman. And it’ll be at a much lower influence because the woke right don’t actually read books. If anything, the only true advancements are going to be AI memes, with other characters being tested and then other properties.

Many are comparing Malfoid to Bowsette, which was a similar meme in 2018. Back then, Nintendo completely ignored the meme and refused to comment on it, with Rowling currently making DAMN sure she doesn’t acknowledge any of these Malfoid memes. The problem is that if they ever admit they know of the meme and then take it, then it becomes a legal battleground that they don’t want to bother with. It’s wonky, but I understand why they would ignore it. At least publicly.

To reiterate: Malfoid is popular because Harry Potter was already popular and it’s a fashion statement people try to use to fight a culture war, but it’s a lot of sellers with few buyers.

I’ve seen a lot of posts with an AI fanfic and the comments are all saying it’s peak. Most of them don’t even read it, they just acknowledge its existence. This is EXACTLY what the left does with their representation nonsense. Have it exist and you must say “slay queen” as a way to fight the culture war enemy. This gives you some ad rev and brownie points, but it doesn’t provide any real value. But, understand, providing real value was never the point of the grifter.

I enjoy the meme a lot. Many have made me laugh and I started thinking about the Harry Potter world again. There’s a good amount of nostalgia for me to enjoy with these thoughts, and I am honestly interested in an anime version of the movies if they ever make them. I love the idea of the scenes restructured as an anime, more than the concept of Malfoid herself. But, like any other trend, it will die with time.

Enjoy it while it lasts.


r/TDLH • • 29d ago

Review Transformers (2007) Review: Allspark and No Spike

1 Upvotes

Peter Cullen died recently at the ripe old age of 85, and so we’re going to talk about the movie that had one of his most famous voice acting roles. That’s right… The first Predator that came out in 1987.

Just kidding, it’s Michael Bay’s Transformers, brought to you by practically every product placement in the world, including the US . What started as a project for the GI Joe toyline (which would be directed by Stephen Sommers in 2009), Transformers has almost nothing to do with the original shows, movies, or comics. As a toyline that’s been around since 1984, there’s been a LOT of content, and Michael Bay avoided all of it. But to explain whether this movie is good or bad, we need to figure out what Transformers even is.

And for transparency: I… never cared for Transformers itself.

I watched Beast Wars as a kid, I liked the Bionicle toys, I liked Hot Wheels, but I could never get into the idea of a brightly colored robot turning into a normal car as a way to disguise itself. Beast Wars tried to make sense of it by having them transform to resist the energon spikes of Earth, but Transformers never tried to step out of that absurdity. The toy itself was so you can roll the wheels as a toy car, and then pull the parts around so a robot can walk around. Boys love playing with cars and playing with robots, so this was a two in one deal at the toy store.

The toyline that inspired it started in Japan as a puzzle style toy back in the 70s, which included household objects, and never tried to have a storyline or narrative. Around that time, Hasbro was having a decrease of sales with their Star Wars lineup, which was a massive thing back in the 70s, alongside the first gen of GI Joe(with the kung fu grip) and the Nerf Ball. An interesting part of the late 70s and early 80s is how much the US was… well, using Japan as occupied territory and a cheap media alternative. Much like how we use South Korea now to create a lot of media for peanuts, Japan started being the main source of exotic goods. If you ever wondered how anything Japanese became popular in the US, it’s because Stan Lee had Marvel tether the countries together with Toei back in 1977.

Marvel was also used for the comic books and storylines of both GI Joe and Transformers when Hasbro caught wind of these little puzzle toys from Takara called Microman. Funny enough, Microman was created because GI Joe was popular, but they couldn't really make military toys in Japan because of US occupation. The reason Japan has so much media about futuristic robots and mechs is the same reason hentai has tentacles and pixelation: the US placed stupid laws that prevented them from having sensible media, so they had to find a work around.

During Transformers G1 (the first generation), the TV show was used to market the toys. Most episodes followed the same premise as He-Man and GI Joe, which followed the Spider-man and His Amazing Friends setup: a villain has an evil scheme and the heroes go out to stop them. This repeated itself for 98 episodes… across 3 years. These days, a TV show would struggle to make 8 episodes a year. In the 80s, we had over 30.

Back then, Marvel was an animation powerhouse, which technically it still is but not in a good way.

I mention all of this because the storyline of Transformers never truly mattered. It’s not like it’s designed to be complicated. It’s two factions duking it out and fighting over some MacGuffin, same like He-Man and same like GI Joe and same like Command and Conquer. But while GI Joe was just a special army unit fighting mutant terrorists like Captain America would, Transformers went the Fantastic Four route… which is absolutely bonkers.

Allow me to explain the concept of Transformers in a few sentences.

There’s a planet called Cybertron, which is actually a robot god of light called Primus. I know I lost some of you already, but stay with me. The two factions that live on Cybertron are the good guys called Autobots and the bad guys are called Decepticons. The reason they fight is because their bodies are fueled by an energy called energon. This becomes scarce on Cybertron, so they fight over reserves.

Primus fights against a god of chaos called Unicron, who doesn’t really come into the picture until the motion picture of 1986, where he’s defeated by an alliance of the Autobots and Decepticons and he’s reduced to a head that serves as a moon that revolves around Cybertron.

So if most of the story takes place on another planet, why does Earth get involved?

Earth has a lot of energon and so both factions crash land on Earth to take whatever they can get. The problem is that it’s not a natural form of energon because that stuff was made by Primus and is on Cybertron. Earth allows them to make a synthetic energon cube, which is made from things like electricity, oil, and volcanos. The Autobots want to trade and be on good terms with humans to get this resource, while the Decepticons want to enslave humans and conquer the solar system. And all of this is after the Ark crashed on Earth during dinosaur times, and both factions were woken up by a volcanic eruption, leading to an attack on a nearby oil rig.

This is where humans first meet both Autobots and Decepticons, with the father and son duo called Sparkplug and Spike Witwicky, who befriend the autobots and help to repair their battle damages.

This is G1 in a nutshell. Very little story happens outside of this. So what the 2007 movie set out to do was combine GI Joe with Transformers under the guidance of a famous alien movie producer (Spielberg) and he chose a director who was known for making very urban crime comedies and had a little experience with space when he made Armageddon(1998), which is about a giant meteor getting blown up by Bruce Willis.

But thankfully, Bay also had war film experience with Pearl Harbor (2001), where he got practically everything wrong when it comes to the Day of Infamy, all because he wanted a bunch of explosions and some romance story that nobody cared about.

Little did he know, all he had to do was make a movie about a Japanese inspired toyline from the 80s and all of his past sins would be redeemed.

Originally, I wanted to do a scene by scene review, because I kept track of every scene in my notes like the fool I am. The problem is that this is a 2.5 hour hunk of garbage that really should have been 90 minutes. The basic plot is that we have two groups, Team A and Team B dealing with killer robots from space called Decepticons, and all because these robots want to find the Allspark.

In the prologue, Peter Cullen himself narrates as Optimus Prime about how the Allspark Cube crashed on Earth long ago and it was created before time itself. At first it was called the Allspark Matrix, but they changed it to a cube because The Matrix trilogy was still popular and they thought audiences would confuse the two. This thing landed… somewhere, and so Megatron chased it down after knowing the coordinates, with Megatron frozen in the Arctic Circle when he crashed, to be later discovered by an explorer called Archibald Witwicky, who had the coordinates burned into his glasses when he accidentally touched Megatron’s hand. 

So touching Megatron’s hand activates his eye lasers to burn the last thing he was thinking of into the nearest pane of glass… Got it!

Team B is actually the first team we see, but they don’t matter as much because they’re the residue of the GI Joe script. Meet the leader of the team, Captain Willaim Lennox(played by Josh Duhamel, who I only recognize as Jacob from The Callisto Protocol), who introduces himself by talking to his wife and new baby on a laptop, which is how we get tension when they have to unplug the wi-fi with a fireaxe. Why is someone pulling a Robert Chandler and chopping down the internet? Well, an attack helicopter entered the base and transformed into a giant killer robot, revealed to be named Blackout.

Coincidentally enough, he causes a blackout. Blackout by name AND Blackout by reputation. 

There’s also Sergeant Robert Epps (played by Tyrese Gibson (of Fast and Furious fame), who is forever burned into my mind as “that guy with blinding white teeth in the commercial.” It's always stayed with me the clip of them running in the desert and all I can see is this guy’s giant chompers gleaming like they’re calling out an SOS. Now, the reason why they’re running is because the base is blown up by Blackout, and another Decepticon called Scorponok goes into the sand and pops out to chase them.

You might think “oh, this happens all in the same scene, right?”

No!

Blackout hacks the Qatar SOCCENT base, then we cut to Team A, made up of Sam Witwicky and Mikaela Banes. Each team gets like 5 seconds and then they switch, with very little progress each scene. For example, Team B left the base at night, to later be walking through the desert in the day, only to have a random guy speak Spanish and Epps says the robot stared right at him. As you can see, it’s not important, but Bay put it there to remind the audience that they exist.

You might start seeing a pattern with how they viewed the audience and their mental capacity.

I think that’s my main problem with these films. Not only is it designed for ADHD, but it’s designed like Michael Bay never left his career of doing car commercials and music videos. Each edit lasts a second, each scene is 5 seconds, and nothing is allowed to breathe. Once your eyes can comprehend the hyper yellow and blue shot, you’re already in a different location with different characters talking. If someone told me the editor was blindfolded and had to use his sense of smell, I would believe them.

That’s another annoying thing about the film: the filters they used make every image as orange as possible, like everyone ate too many carrots. Teeth and eyes are blinding white, everyone is hyper tan, and every scene might as well be locked into the world’s longest sunset.

Team B gets chased all the way to a tiny village in the middle of nowhere, and they are in desperate need of a phone. Lennox picks up a kid and magically finds the right house where his parents live, asking for a phone to people who magically understand English. He calls for air support on the phone because Scorponok is hot on their tail shooting missiles from his pincers. Two fun facts about this scene is that it was shot at the White Sands Missile Range, which is still technically radioactive from Trinity, and required a sweep to make sure there aren’t any unexploded ordnance hidden in the sand; AND the hunt for the phone was based on a real story Bay heard from a soldier, which may or may not have included the Indian operator we get in the film.

Bay learned from his past mistakes with Pearl Harbor and so he asked military people to double check the script to make sure it’s not painfully inaccurate again. Sadly, he didn’t ask computer people to check how computers work, but we’ll get to that later.

There’s this thing in Michael Bay movies called “bayhem”, where he makes sure the real set is blurred and blended into the special effects by constantly moving the camera and splicing the footage like it’s a commercial. This works wonderfully when you’re not paying attention. You see a bunch of explosions and screaming, ok, you go back to falling asleep on your long flight to China. But to someone who’s paying attention and wants to keep track of words, every scene leaves the brain no matter what.

Lindsay Ellis made a video about how it’s hard to remember what happens in these movies, and she had one thing right: sensory overload causes people to check out, but not about senses. It’s about how we get a million points of interest in a scene and they aren’t connected to each other. It’s this lack of synergy and lack of unification that makes it always seem to be several stories at a time. For example, things are exploding, people are shooting, Scorponok shoots back, and then the Indian Operator is asking if the guy wants an express service package or whatever, and all the while Lemmox has to find a credit card and only Epps has one, which is on his left cheek pocket, causing Epps to scream “left cheek” over and over again.

There are like 5 stories being told while everything is exploding. 

Bay uses this to his advantage because he’s designing it like a commercial. When cars are driving, it gets like 20 cuts before the wheels can do a single rotation, and when people are talking they always talk over each other so all you can catch is a random line that’s meant to be over the top. But then you get something involving the plot, and everything stops to have Optimus Prime stare directly at the camera and start saying his mumbo jumbo. So when we go from Sam’s book report, to getting his car, to soldiers fighting a giant robot scorpion, to searching for a credit card, to an Indian operator at his office, we have no idea why these scenes are together. But then we see the airstrikes happen with the A-10 Tank Killers using its gatling and the AC-130H Spectre Gunship uses its 105mm howitzer cannon, causing great damage to Scorponok and forcing him to retreat.

What many don’t appreciate is that the military could actually hold its own against Transformers. There is a lot of noise from small arms fire, but we also see that assault rifles can do damage and destroy the eyes of these robots, it’s just that they don’t do much. Later on, everyone realizes that the weakness of these robots is explosives, as if we expected something else from a Michael Bay film. For the most part, the military focuses on airstrikes, mostly to resemble how actual war is fought these days, and I guess multiple tanks on set would be expensive.

While they’re enjoying the action, Team A has Sam doing his book report in class about his great grandfather, Arichibald Witwicky. During his report, Sam tries to sell his great grandfather’s relics, like his glasses, and mentions the product placement eBay. Because he was hawking items in class, his teacher gives him a B-, ruining Sam’s chance of getting a car. And so, Sam begs, pleads, and cries for an A, asking his teacher what would Jesus do.

To address the Ironhide in the room, we have to understand that Sam is played by Shia LaBeouf, who unfortunately lost his marbles after this series. Most of it has to do with his messed up childhood, and his career started as a potty mouth stand-up comedian at age 10. You read that correctly: age 10. He was well known for swearing long before his rise to fame with Even Stevens, although many consider the movie Holes the reason why he was picked for the role of Sam. He was in a movie called Disturbia, which was filmed and released only a few months before his relation to Transformers, so we can’t really count that as a reason.

What I’m trying to say is that Shia LaBeouf was 20 when he played the role, but he’s supposed to be 16. This scene made me instantly hate Sam as a character and all of his dialogue that followed.

And you might be thinking “Hey, Witwicky! Haven’t I heard that stupid name before?” Yes, that’s the boy from G1, who was called Spike. They just switched it with a different name that starts with S. The character design is so much different from the cartoon, all because Bay loves to have a protagonist who doesn’t know when to shut the fuck up. Shia played the role perfectly, with top notch acting.

The problem is that he doesn’t shut the fuck up and the dialogue is as if a teenager wrote it in anger after getting shoved in a locker.

After his dad pranks him with a Porsche product placement (with the car dealer right across the street from the school), they go to a used car lot owned by Bernie Mac. He’s funny with the back and forth between him and his mom, and the mom flipping him off. It’s just sad to see it in 2026 because he died shortly after the release (2008) and he was one of my favorite comedians. His delivery was able to make a painfully boring scene actually enjoyable as an Autobot called Bumblebee sneaks onto the auto lot.

There’s an autobot in an auto lot.

A little side note: Michael Bay has a very strange sense of humor, and I don’t know where this comes from. It’s funny, the back and forth with the mom and she flips him off made me love the scene, but it always comes out of nowhere in what is otherwise an overly white film. Bay himself grew up around all “white” people in LA, with his movie Bad Boys (1995) requiring Martin Larwence and Will Smith to “make sure the dialogue is properly colorful”.

Sam’s mom and dad are also great, but they don’t become comedy gold until the sequel. The dad’s highlight is when he makes Sam get a lemon (get it, BB is yellow) while they live in a giant LA mansion, and the mom has her moment when she embarrasses Sam in front of Mikaela when she’s in his room. Mojo the dog wasn’t my thing because I don’t care for chihuahuas and his highlight is that he lives in a bird house looking thing.

Sam is looking for a car, but little did he know, a car is looking for Sam. This part makes zero sense because none of the Autobots know about the glasses or Sam until later, meaning Bumblebee just wanted to have an owner who’s a random kid. Also, his original design was a Volkswagen Beetle, while here he’s a Chevrolet Camaro. It’s not much of a difference, but it’s a dorky car vs a muscle car, specifically so Sam can look cool and I guess Chevrolet paid more for product placement.

Sam has a crush on Mikaela(played by Megan Fox), so he goes to a party by a lake, his friend tries to climb a tree, and Mikaela’s boyfriend makes fun of Sam for failing football practice. This is all so that Mikaela tries to do a 10 mile walk home in anger, just so Sam can show off his car and make her horny. But BB pretends to break down in the middle of nowhere, leading us to the famous “reaching under the hood” scene; where she exposes her abs, her ass is arching like a McDonald’s sign, and we get to see her armpits.

I’ll be honest: it’s hard to care about this type of sexualized scene if you never saw the movie. I never saw it before, so I didn’t know why people kept making a fuss about Fox, especially since she wasn’t in anything much prior and she was fully clothed. Fun fact, she was actually in Bad Boy’s 2 (2003), but as an uncredited bikini dancer, meaning Micheal Bay worked with her, but didn’t know who she was when she arrived on set for Transformers. It’s a bit more embarrassing when you realize she was only 15 in that movie, with her age being 20 in Transformers, but trying to play a 16 year old.

This became the talk of the town because stupid people don't understand that a 20-year-old playing a 16 year old is still a 20-year-old. For whatever reason, controversy strikes when a character gets sexualized, and all of the feminists try to create as many ridiculous arguments as possible for why this is not allowed. Meanwhile, normal people looked at the scene and went “damn she's hot when she's all sweaty and working on the car.” Sure, Megan Fox looks like a Dollar Tree sex doll now that she’s full of plastic surgery, but when she was 20, she was one hot tamale. My favorite part of her body is not the bouncing B-cups or the lack of ass.

It’s her gorgeous blue eyes and her stiletto eyebrows. You can get lost in those divine peepers.

They hit it off, Sam says “you’re more than meets the eye”, which is a jab at the slogan of G1 "Transformers: more than meets the eye”. The slogan is actually great because these robots are certainly more than what we can see from their car shaped exteriors. And it’s not only about their disguise, but how these robots are living, and they have heart, with Optimus Prime representing the things that are willing to protect other living creatures. Bay uses this slogan to be a hipster about it, because he came into the project thinking the toyline is too childish for him. This is where we can understand why so much was changed from the source material.

Bay did the movie because he wanted to work with Spielberg as a job opportunity. Spielberg wanted to make it because he’s always focused on toylines and kids films. But for some reason, both are really dedicated to hitting that PG-13 rating with language and a warped sense of violence. For example, everyone is saying fuck and shit in the movie, but then the violence is unable to show any blood when everything explodes. So people will get shot by missiles and laser cannons, only to jump away from it instead of getting the Saving Private Ryan treatment.

And all the while, the entire movie is strictly designed for kids, while Michael Bay makes sure it’s for adults who act like kids.

People will think I’m stating it negatively, but it’s more about how Bay said the original script is “too kiddie” for his style, and then he turns around to make robots pee on people and every awkward joke is delivered twice (as if it was funny the first time). If anything, his mentality comes from how there’s a split in nerd culture between extrovert and introvert, with Transformers creating the perfect combination of the two sides. 

If you like cars and military jargon, you get the extrovert aspect with conventionally hot chicks.

If you like robots and alien sci-fi, you get the introvert aspect with conventionally hot chicks who wear glasses.

I say this because Mikaela is meant to be that alternative to the cheerleader, where instead she’s a reluctant bad girl who works on cars, and there’s another girl who acts like a love interest for the audience who’s all about robots and computers.

Before we talk about Maggie, there’s a GIANT mess of BB driving away on his own, Sam getting arrested, cop claims he’s on drugs because he’s carrying doggy pain meds, BB chases Sam and Sam crashes his mom’s bike at a Burger King right in front of Mikaela. And all while flipping back and forth between Team B and the Pentagon. The only plot points are that BB calls for the other Autobots with a headlight signal, a Decepticon called Frenzy hacks Airforce One to find out about Sam’s eBay account, and so a cop car Decepticon called Barricade corners Sam under a bridge.

He transforms and starts pounding on the car Sam is trapped on top of, demanding to know if he’s Ladysman217 and where the glasses are. This scene is made more intense by how they used practical effects, and so Shia’s screams are pretty genuine when his feet are being bonked by an actual fender and other cars are actually flying over his head. Now you might be wondering “why not use a CGI car to fly overhead when they’re already using CGI for Barricade?"

Well…

Oh shit, it’s Bumblebee! Coming to the rescue. And Mikaela, who's driving a tiny blue scooter and trying her hardest to not look stupid. She’s almost successful, with both of them needing to be saved by Bumblebee, and so they get driven out of there in a high speed chase. They go through roads, through abandoned buildings, a trainyard, a power plant, we get all sorts of locations that make zero sense. For a movie that was dedicated to shoot on location, it didn’t put much effort to let us know what the locations are. 

All Bay wanted was bragging rights.

Throughout the movie, we are distracted by how great the special effects look. In 2007, CGI was still rather new and even movies like Sin City (2005) had to revolutionize film making with very simple CGI models and backgrounds. But what many forget is that Stephen Spielberg practically created the CGI that we use today when he made Jurassic Park and this movie used a studio called ILM, which was started by George Lucas, who just got done making the prequel Star Wars trilogy. In short, the CGI was in AMAZING hands and the animators were all fans of the original Transformers series.

A key element that isn’t part of the original is that the faces of the Transformers here are designed like a Rubik’s Cube, rather than a full face coming into existence during transformation. A big focus was making sure every part of the vehicle’s mass gets used by the robot’s form, rather than evaporated or have a bunch of extra material appear from nothing. This was incredibly ambitious, and a decision from Bay himself, where the animation studio wanted to use a liquid type of face for the models. It was so ambitious that a single frame of the movie’s CGI took over 38 hours to render, especially since Bay wanted a form of ray tracing that would resemble his work from car commercials.

Frenzy pulls off Sam’s pants, Mikaela saws off Frenzy’s head with a random power tool, and BB finishes off Barricade in like 5 seconds. This movie tries really hard to have good CGI, but can’t have it for too long, so they would substitute fight scenes with humans doing something at a smaller scale. Frenzy’s head walks on its own to disguise itself as a cellphone and hides in Mikaela’s purse. We then see the other Autobots arrive in a giant meteor shower. We find out that the Transformers will scan a random vehicle in order to disguise as one, with Optimus Prime landing in a pool, gets asked if he’s the tooth fairy, and then changes into a semi-truck. This confused the hell out of me because I always thought he was a firetruck. I was kind of correct because he changed to one in the 2001 series, but the original had him as a semi. 

And this brings up a good question: why DO they turn into cars?

Since G1, the point of a Transformer was not that they start as human cars and live on Cybertron without any human contact. Their initial forms were futuristic vehicles that simply allow them to travel faster, and this ability is used to disguise themselves on Earth and avoid confrontations. What many forget is that Transformers is in the super hero genre, and their vehicle form is like when Superman puts on the glasses to be Clark Kent. It’s a cool ability, and I now understand why they’re cars, but I also find the lack of proper choices caused by “wearing a uniform” a bit annoying.

What also bugs me is that everyone is introduced in a random alleyway, Jazz breakdances to be urban, and they’re all introduced like we were supposed to know who they are. Their knowledge of everything and their ability to speak English is given the excuse of “we learned from the internet” even though they just arrived from space. Also BB is unable to talk due to a broken voice box, so he’s forced to talk in radio shows and songs. And then we get the overly long “searching for the glasses” scene.

If we didn’t have this useless scene, the movie would have been less than 2 hours. We go up and down Sam’s house, there’s a blackout from the Autobots being clumsy, they ruin the yard, and all while Sam’s parents are trying to break into his room and assume he’s masterbating. We get one scene that lingers, and it’s half an hour of nothing, until Sector 7 agents arrive out of nowhere to detain Sam for having a radiation frequency. This is done after the Decepticons found out Sam has the glasses… from Sector 7. 

The head agent, Seymour Simmons (played by John Turturro) is… annoying. I don’t care for his character and I’m glad BB peed on him. But then again, maybe the point of his character is to enjoy the idea of him getting peed on. I don’t know. I don’t want to look into that kind of symbolism considering he's meant to be a Jewish Egyptian Catholic played by a 100% Italian.

The Autobots get Sam away from Sector 7, only to get captured themselves in the most stupid of ways possible. BB gets harpooned by a helicopter, and Optimus Prime tells the others to not engage, because they don’t want to harm humans. They’re not humans, they’re with Sector 7! Open fire!

We are sent to the Hoover Dam, and I have to explain Team C for a moment.

Team C is made up of Maggie Medsen and her hacker friend Glenn, with her friend involved strictly because he’s played by Anthony Anderson. I love Ant in Scary Movie 3 as the dreadlocks guy, but he doesn’t get much to work with here. All he does is eat a plate of donuts off screen and I guess that became a meme. His house getting raided by the FBI was also a meme for a while, all because Maggie wanted him to hack a Decepticon frequency she stole from the Pentagon for NO REASON.

Maggie is an Australian data analyst who wanted to stop the US from accidentally attacking other countries, so she wanted to prove it was aliens. Obviously, this means she has to steal a Decepticon frequency from the Airforce One hacking by plugging an SD card into a Pentagon computer and walking away. Meanwhile, the military knows about the aliens because they’re connected to Sector 7, but they refuse to communicate, all so we can waste another 30mins with Maggie adding nothing to the movie. Her actress, Rachel Taylor(known previously for Man-Thing) isn’t bad; she’s blonde with glasses and sort of hot. It’s just that her character has nothing to do until she and her friend end up in the same helicopter heading to the Hoover Dam as Sam and Mikaela. In fact, once we hit the Hoover Dam, she and Glenn are only in the movie to waste more time in some library area.

Now you might be thinking “what’s so important about the Hoover Dam?”

Well, Archibald found Megatron in the snow back in 1897(which is how his glasses were zapped), and Sector 7 was started by seven random guys in 1935 to bring Megatron to the US and hide him specifically under the Hoover Dam during its construction. This “hiding” is to have him under a small tunnel network that’s accessible by jeep and it’s not really hidden since there are always tourists. The filming had to be done early in the morning before tourists were allowed, which makes it funny how Megatron’s body is just sitting there, constantly needing to be cryogenically frozen. But the main reason was to build this dam AROUND the Allspark, which landed in the colorado river way back when. This is where a lot of confusion happens.

And I’m not just talking about how Megatron was reverse engineered to make modern tech.

The Allspark Cube is massive, and it doesn’t get shrunk down to a hand-held cube until BB is released from captivity during a military mutiny(with Captain Lennox threatening Seymour personally). Before this, the power of the cube is presented by having someone’s cellphone turned into a feral robot, because the spark causes robot life to emerge from electronics. Megatron wants this because it would allow him to spark life into anything and make more minions. But then this begs the question…

Why does the Allspark cause every new creation to be instantly in attack mode?

Like how the Decepticons couldn’t find the dam after knowing about Sector 7 and the glasses, this was never explained. But we do see Frenzy coming out of the purse to release Megatron from cryo-sleep and reveal the location for Starscream to fly in and start shooting missiles. I’m not a big Starscream fan, and he only gets one line in this movie, but HOLY SHIT he’s voiced by Charlie Adler. He was the Big Heads from Roco’s Modern Life, he was Ickis in Ahhhh! Real Monsters, he also played Cobra Commander a few times, and they did him dirty in this one. Same with Ironhide being voiced by Jess Harnell, who was Captain Hero in Drawn Together.

Less dirty, since Mojo peed on Ironhide and he said “you have a rodent infestation”, which he delivered beautifully.

A big fight breaks out as the Hoover Dam is invaded by Decepticons and so Sam grabs the Allspark and drives out of there with BB, to meet up with the other Autobots along an empty highway, and this leads us to the epic climax after Optimus kills Bonecrusher on the road. Maggie and Glenn fight off Frenzy in this weird library place and it’s treated as important because they have to send an airstrike call with morris code using a computer, but none of it makes sense and Frenzy knocks his own block off with his own shuriken for no reason. Paper fluttering was beautiful as shotguns blow up filing cabinets, but god is it pointless and stupid.

The last 30 mins is all one giant fight in a place called Mission City, which becomes a combat zone for absolutely no reason, other than Sam and the Autobots stop there to meet up with Captain Lennox… who was in the dam. Because there is no internet, the military is forced to use old radios that shouldn’t work at all, but they somehow do, and they are able to contact airsupport (again). Here, we have a big mess of activity, with a tank Transformer called Brawl coming in to shoot at Sam and Mikaela, but Bay changed his name to Devastator because he didn’t like Brawl. If you ask me: both names suck. Starscream comes in and also shoots missiles down on everyone, doing a surprising amount of damage because he blows off BB’s legs. Jazz tries to help by breakdancing and pulling the tank’s turret out of the way, forcing Devastator to transform as well.

Megatron finds Sam and chases him through an abandoned church, and up a million flights of stairs, which gets skipped over because Bay just wanted the shot of a bunch of stairs going upward. Mikalea gets into a towtruck and drags Bumblebee backward through the street, having him shoot his cannon at all fighting. I have to admit: this part is epic because it’s BB having his own rail shooter moment, with all of the practical effects blowing up around him. Lennox tries to have his own moment and steals a motorcycle to ride it straight into Starscream, jumps off, slides at like 60mph, and unloads a grenade launcher into his nuts and bolts. The only thing impressive about this was how his uniform survived such a terrible road rash.

There’s also a part when Sam runs by a Mountain Dew vending machine, and the Allspark randomly turns it into a feral robot, which leads to nothing at all. It’s just… there… so Mountain Dew can pay them.

Megatron corners Sam against the spires of the church, with Sam having his body practically dangle off of the edge of the church by his fingertips. This was THE MOST DANGEROUS stunt in the movie, because he’s actually on Michigan Central Station, which is 230ft high, and there was no safety net. Just a hip wire and Jesus. All to have a shot that didn’t need to exist because Megatron sweeps his sword across the roof, blows it up with a fiery explosion, Sam falls, only to be caught by Optimus Prime who then slides all the way down and takes half of the building with him.

The shots are amazing and the practical effects are worth their cost(kind of), but none of these scenes make any sense. Somehow, Megatron wanted the Allspark, so his bright idea was to blow it up with his sword. Genius.

And now… for the biggest disappointment.

Optimus Prime and Megatron square up to duke it out. We get pumped, we get a little speech, and then it cuts to EVERYTHING ELSE except for the two fighting. Excuse me, but we’re here for Optimus and Megatron to strut their stuff. But when they’re about to fight, we get Starscream running away, Devastator gets blasted by Bumblebee, and Sam hides in a broken sewer pipe nearby. Optimus falls down somehow and then trips Megatron who also falls down.

Optimus tells Sam to put the Allspark into his chest to prevent Megatron from getting it, and Megatron claws at Sam after tripping. But Sam quickly shoves the Allspark into Megatron’s chest cavity, overloading his power core and killing him instantly. That means this entire time, when Optimus was ready to sacrifice himself… all they had to do was shove it into Megatron instead. 

The day is won, Bumblebee has his voice back (for no reason), Megatron’s corpse is thrown into the ocean (with a shot from the same aircraft carrier footage used in Pearl Harbor), Sam and Mikaela kiss on top of Bumblebee during sunset, and Optimus calls upon every Autobot floating around space to come to Earth because they like humans. And it’s because “humans are more than what meets the eye.”

Cue Linkin Park’s last good song as we hit the credits.

Blockbusters in the US have a very strange habit of celebrating the Fourth of July weekend with a movie about aliens attacking, and it follows the Fourth of July Weekend footsteps of War of the Worlds(2005), Men in Black(1997), and this tradition sort of started with Independence Day(1996). And like these other movies, you’re meant to shut up, eat your popcorn, drink your Halo flavored Mountain Dew, and turn your brain off.

This movie is one of the STUPIDEST things I’ve ever seen and also one of the most impressive when it comes to production. So many moments have me saying “this part must be CGI” and then I look it up and nope, it’s real people next to real explosions. That’s Shia actually about to be crushed by a flying car, that’s an actual low flying jet, that’s actually the Hoover Dam, that’s the actual Pentagon. They tried so hard to pretend this isn’t a military recruitment film by having the government have a Sector 7, but then the military is also against Sector 7 because of how slimy they are. You can see where the GI Joe element was merged into the film from the very first scene on Earth, because it starts with soldiers on a helicopter chatting about nothing.

This movie is the film equivalent of those toy guns that you’d get that have like 20 sound effects, with none of them being the sound of a gun and ALL of them are annoying. The dialogue is either a bad joke being repeated twice, someone screaming, Optimus Prime doing a monologue, or incoherent babbling. To be a fly on the wall when Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman are forced to write a new scene after 2 or 3 words are spoken. The script has more sluglines than lines of dialogue, because it was more important to get a shot of a guy randomly washing his dog than it was to finish the thought. And even though the plot makes zero sense, from the Allspark existing, to how the glasses have the coordinates, to how Megatron’s been hidden in the Hoover Dam for 100 years… it still feels like an 80s Transformer’s movie.

The only thing missing is energon, which was the whole reason the Cybertron crisis existed in the first place!

Other than that massive blunder, this movie was not only an homage to original Transformers, but also a massive homage to the insanity that is Roland Emmrich, with both Independence Day and Stargate. I believe Bay’s goal was simple: do the things Spielberg and Emmerich would do to make money. And so he did, and it was a lot of money. The movie cost about $200M and made over $700M, with each project making more profit until The Last Knight(2017) was a boxoffice bomb(a loss of $100M). From making billions, to only losing a fraction of that, by using a toyline that was never praised for its story, that’s impressive.

I have to admit, the movie made me watch the original show to figure out what was so special. In short: nothing, the show is equally stupid, but in its own way. The theme remains the same in both where humans are worth saving, and so aliens want to work alongside humans as allies, as if we have this big team of Supermen made of metal, with both species able to learn from each other. And surprisingly, these movies caused people to buy more of the toys than ever, which is a plus for Hasbro. I watched the other movies out of curiosity and they’re basically the same thing but more incoherent with each installment.

I’m not sure if I’ll do a review of them, and it’s the same fatal flaw this movie and the original series had: nothing can be remembered as a detail, but I remember that it was dumb fun. Ironically, because of its visual focus and lack of depth, it still begs for more than meets the eye.


r/TDLH • • Aug 29 '26

Discussion What I Learned Writing a 132,000 Word Video Script in 2 Months

1 Upvotes

Yup, you read that title correctly. Allow me to explain.

4 years ago, I started a book analysis for Axiom’s End by Lindsay Ellis. I only wanted to touch upon the first chapter, a lot of it was more about writing advice and explaining postmodernism, ending up around 2 hours to cover 12 pages of cringe. About 1 year ago, I continued this analysis to cover the next 5 chapters, reaching chapter 6, and it was also about 2 hours. I figured this was plenty, I don’t need to say anymore, we’ve beaten the dead horse. Other people have said more than I can and went through the whole book.

For those of you out of the loop, this is the first book out of a trilogy, called the Noumena series. And no, it doesn’t have anything to do with the Mah Na Mah Na song by Piero Umiliani. It is a trilogy that was meant to be 5 books, but Lindsay’s first book bombed at the Barnes and Noble office, so they compromised for a trilogy as long as the remaining 2 books aren’t edited by the publisher (St. Martin’s Press). I mention this because I went to a Barnes and Noble this year and I saw a copy of the third book rotting on the shelf. That third book being Apostles of Mercy.

What I saw in the book, after flipping to a random page near the middle, shocked me so deeply… I realized I had to analyze this book as well. Especially because so many covered the first book and very few bothered with the sequels. But to do that, I would have to finish the Axiom’s End Analysis and then cover the second book, Truth of the Divine. I went home, dusted off my copy of Axiom’s End, and figured it couldn’t be that bad after Chapter 6.

Oh, it’s bad…

It was so bad that I was having a ball for days on end, roasting it and making my little zingers. And all I could think about with each laughable attempt at a sentence was poor old Lindsay Ellis, the Nostalgia Chick that tried to bring down Channel Awesome with the Not So Awesome Document. She thought she was going to get a Hugo Award for this. Yeah Lindsay, in your dreams.

While reading through the book, I saw a video recommended to me from Red Cow Arcade, where they went over the Change the Channel controversy, which was a campaign led by Lindsay, Marzgurl, Obscurus Lupa, and the former HR lady Holly Christine Brown. In this video, they mentioned what sparked their interest, which was a video series by a Youtuber called Nettles, who went through every nook and cranny of the document and debunked EVERYTHING. His series actually caused all of these women to fight among each other and throw one another under the bus, because all he did was question the validity of their baseless claims.

My analysis will have very little to do with this (I might cover it in an EWW video), but this fueled more disgust when thinking about how awful a person Lindsay is. She wants to be the smartest person in the room, yet she’s always the dumbest, even if she’s in an empty rock quarry. Speaking of, she recently used Dolly Parton’s death to have an excuse to complain about JK Rowling of all people. I’m not joking, this is literally what she did for 45 mins. A little dollop about Dolly, and then a big ol’ diatribe about Joanne. 

She can’t even pretend to care about someone’s death when grifting, which is giving everyone Jew Wario flashbacks.

Trust me, watch the Nettles series when you are bored and you’ll understand these references.

And speaking of Nettles, what made me feel confident is that people just want to listen about how ridiculous these lolcows are. Chris Chan has numerous documentaries going over the craziness and the most famous one is known by millions and has like 85 parts(and counting). People don’t want to BE there, but they want to hear about it. Most people don’t want to READ Linday’s book, but many are fascinated by how everything went wrong and how a traditional publisher even dared to have it published. I think a lot of what makes people fascinated by authortuber books is that we get this guru approach to writing from them, that they have all the answers, all to find out that they can’t write for beans.

I don’t want to simply capture this schadenfreude. I want to wring out every last drop and then some, to do it again for the next book and the one after that. I want the absurdity that Geno Samuel and Nettles have, where they are known for having hours of content covering such a disaster. I want all of her simps to dread the sight of my videos in their recommended, to the point that they are spoken about in shuddering whispers behind locked doors. I already have people try to use 4 hours of content  as a jab.

Well guess what: now it’s going to be 18 hours.

132,000 words roughly ends up being around 14 hours of talking, with this being split between 7 videos. Each video is split between 7 parts: the intro, 5 chapters, and then the summary.

If I was told I had to do this 4 years ago, I’d say it would be impossible and I would be working on them forever. But over time, I learned how to make estimates, keep track of time spent, and record everything in a spreadsheet program. This simple habit and process saved me tons of hours with each project, and that time saved means more ability to make more projects. Allow me to go over the times of each step, to give a proper example.

The actual script writing took a total of 66 hours, when my estimate was 130 hours. Over the course of 2 months, it was a little bit over 1 hour a day typing. My typing speed was about 33 wpm. What helped greatly in the beginning was voice typing, but I forgot to do it in the later days and there’s a visible difference with how the first part was done faster than the others. But a big reason why I wasn’t doing it later on was because I had to collect all of the reference points in the editing phase, so I didn’t want to juggle around with so many things, even though juggling would have made it faster. This is something I’m going to make habitual when Truth of the Divine gets started.

Editing took 37 hours, with the estimate at 43, so it was a lot closer than the typing estimate. I took a little over half an hour per day editing. Copy and pasting reference points was the majority of editing, which is not bad, but it’s something I need to pay more attention to and save time with. Editing is just reading what I already wrote, fixing up the sentences, and then adding more when I think of more things. In this part, typing speed is not much of an issue, but reading speed is.

In the beginning, I read and typed at the same time, and I started to wonder if a different approach would be faster. So in the last two videos, I would read first, make comments, and this took about 1.5 hours every 5 chapters. Most of the time I was making comments because I’m a speed reader. Learning how to read faster helps greatly with making initial comments and editing, but not so much with script writing because that’s all in your thinking speed. 

According to the charts… I took longer with the final 2 videos.

However, the editing was easier than the previous videos, by a spread of 3 hours. For scripting, the spread was 4 hours, meaning somewhere in there, I was spending about the same amount of time, so if I’m reading first or reading second it MIGHT be a difference of 1 hour. I would have to do more testing to figure it out exactly, but I think this is important to mention because many creators don’t leave their comfort zone and fail to test out theories.

Another thing I learned is that the author is almost as fascinating as the book itself, and doing an analysis requires a bit of research into the author, when available. The history of authortubers are fully available, because they want their status to be exposed by default. Lindsay, for example, made everything about Transformers and Disney movies in her online career, and so it was easy to find the connections and make references. All of the books that Lindsay said were her inspirations were not at all the main inspirations. Many times, that became its own topic, so we can see where things started and how things ended up.

It’s kind of like realizing the movie AI(2001) started as a Stanley Kubrick movie and ended up as a Stephen Spielberg movie, and that’s why it was so up and down.

Speaking of ups and downs, there were a lot of moments where I felt like quitting. particularly around the middle of the book where nothing was happening. It was so full of filler that the video “Chapters 12 - 16” is the shortest video, estimated around an hour and a half. There was such a little to say because these chapters were short and pointless. I think at this time I was also considering packing on more chapters, and I’m glad I didn’t. The final video comes to four chapters, which allows it to be around the same size as everything else. So all I had to do for this smaller video is pack on some extras in the beginning and end, or just have it be a shorter video.

I'm totally fine either way, because all of this is done for fun; I'm just looking for a way to fix up the Feng Shui.

The good news is that these scripts are both done and done faster than I estimated.

The bad news is that now I have to move on to the video processing stage. The voice narrations, snapping everything into place, and applying all the reference points and contextual content that adds on to the charm.  The amount of time I expect to take for this is about the same amount of time I use for the script writing itself. This means another 2 months at about 2 hours a day and it’ll all be finished.

This makes me excited for my retirement or a secret vacation where I could put a whole work day into a video, with 8 hours a day having each video fully done in like 4 days(video editing included).

And it's not like this is entirely a bad thing. I only say it's the bad news because I have to figure out the estimates after starting the first video, and I would still like to make the process faster. It's already going way faster than I would have imagined 4 years ago. Back then, I would start a project, work my way forward,  and like Linkara, it'll be out when it's out. Now, I can look at the estimate, determine how many hours I would use per day, and then come up with an actual estimate which is rather accurate.

 And if it’s not accurate, it will be out BEFORE the estimate, rather than after.

The most important thing to learn from all of this is that placing estimates, after figuring out how much a previous project took, always needs that yearning to do it faster. Many people follow the belief that more hours into something makes you more of an expert. I am the exact opposite, in a particular way. Finding out how to do the same thing in less hours is what makes someone an expert. Even more of an expert when you decrease the time taken through compound numbers.

There is a theory from James Clear called the Atomic Habits theory, where you do something 1% faster everyday.  Whatever your project is, you find out how to do it 1% faster every time. 1% faster and 1% better. This also comes down to your finances, exercise, anything you do in your life. 1% a day, and you eventually come to a dramatic change. It is both habitual and scientifically valid as a process.

Granted, there will be situations where you max out on your ability to change, meaning there is a plateau. The goal is to find that plateau, stick around in that area, and wait until you can learn how to  lower that plateau’s level. Efficiency is key when dealing with very long projects, because the tiniest of time wasters grow exponentially when a process is repeated every single time. For example, if you work on something 1 hour a day, there is the setup and the finalizing process that we don't take into account, but it's still counting down the seconds.

This project started with me working on the scripts maybe half an hour at a time. Then it became a little bit longer, and a little bit longer after that. By the end, I was ready to wrap everything up and I would be typing a little bit before bed. Yes I was tired, but I also felt the passion behind it, which might have made me stay up a little longer than I should have. But the goal stays the same:  finishing the project that one second faster.

I did not necessarily finish the final videos faster, because they were a bit more complex and they had more things involved. This happens when a book sets up a bunch of plot lines that go nowhere, and then you have to explain why they went nowhere. But, other things can be sped up or set up in order to save time somewhere else.

Another important thing I learned was making your second job easier. Something I had to do was figure out if I am putting enough writing advice, or even putting too many moments of advice together. So I had another document that was keeping track of when advice would come up, which chapter it was, which part it was, and also what that particular advice was. This prevented me from repeating myself, and so I didn't need to go back and read through different documents to find if I was repeating myself.

But this saved me both the time it took to type, and the time it took to read, even if I was dedicated to doing both of these faster. The best thing to do than a faster action is to not need to do the action at all. Zero is faster than any number past zero. This leads me to something I really wish artists would learn. Pay attention to this part, because this affects everyone.

You don’t ACTUALLY need to do things.

I know there’s a muse and a calling and whatever people use as an excuse, but you don’t HAVE to act upon it. Same as how we yearn for some broad who’s ready to ruin our life, there’s no reason to act upon the urge. Self control is like 99% knowing when an action is needed, and doing absolutely nothing the rest of the time. But artists don’t understand this when they think all of their urges are something beyond their control.

Or worse: when they blame God (which happens A LOT).

I say this because I didn’t NEED to spend hundreds of hours on a video series. I don’t have to stay up past my bed time in a moment of passionate ridicule. I do it when I want to have fun and so I can have fun. A lot of naysayers always go “don’t you have anything better to do with your time?”

Easy answer: no, because I’m shitting and it’s this or reading a newspaper.

Having fun and enjoying yourself makes the time fly by. I stayed up late because I blinked and I didn’t realize how much time moved. It’s not a slog or a drain or anything. Lindsay may have felt that when writing her books, but I don’t feel that when analyzing them.

I’m also using this as a jump off point for more analysis videos of more books, with a lot of it being used as a formula structure for how each video should function. I understand the struggle with Youtubers over time isn’t that they have to make a new video, but they have to make it feel fresh, while keeping the same bones. It’s why Nostalgia Critic doesn’t even bother doing reviews anymore and just sticks to skits that nobody likes.

That reminds me: I’m not going to do a full analysis for every book out there. Most of what I cover will be the first chapter, because… they don’t deserve that much beyond the sample. Video games will always be the full game, and as a secret bonus: Current Video game analysis planned is BIOSHOCK. Hope you like talks about Objectivism and Atlas Shrugged.

Next time I do a post like this, it’ll be after the video editing stage, and I’ll share something about how to place things faster or how to make audio better.

Hope this talk about my recent projects taught you something, even if you’re not going to use the knowledge yourself. As you can see, it’s not hard to be a Youtuber. It’s just a journey of finding out how to do that little 1% faster every time.


r/TDLH • • Aug 27 '26

Big-Brain Architecture in Germany, WWII; Or, An Empire of Living Ruins (history + mega-build ideas for Minecraft)

4 Upvotes

Note: And in this age of A.I. and fakeness and rewritten history in general, it's bloody good to still have some real photos and archival footage, etc. At least for now. (Thankfully, I have many images of real history, WWII and otherwise, on my devices. Even if Google Images wants to give me random nonsense, instead.) So, credit here to all the original people and archives and museums for taking these images, or storing them, etc. Many websites were used to find these over the years. :)

So, I made a comment that was well-received about Speer/Hitler's Germania plan; namely, the Avenue of Splendor and its insane 20-lane markless road and 200-metre grand roundabout, fixed with a massive water feature, and six heroic statues around the edge, and another feature in the centre. See image below.

Germania ('World Capital' scheme for New Berlin (likely inspired by the fact newspapers started to print that New York City was the 'World Capital' circa 1930))

Speer/Hitler plans for Germania, the new World Capital (admin hub and parade/propaganda city for the Greater Germanic Reich). Drawings and models only; the project didn't make much real-world progress, until it was crushed entirely in 1944. Notably, the top-down view shows little lines that Speer made for the 20 lanes -- an utter nightmare. And for the time, it was reportedly to be markless. No real traffic system at all... and a 200-metre roundabout (top-right) no less!

Note the little dark speck at the light strip below the car, to the right. Yep. That's a person. A fully grown man. Look how tiny he becomes in the strangling grandeur of the Avenue. Maybe you didn't even notice the car itself? That would be the little box-shaped thing at the edge of the roundabout road to the left of the image, just beyond the first building. There is another car at the other side, behind the statue, directly above the first car. You can hardly even see that one.

Of course, all of this means nothing at the foot of the People's Hall and Triumphal Arch, both clearly seen above. Stupid sizes here. How tall is the arch? From memory? 120 metres. So, the entire height of a Minecraft world. Cute. So cute, in fact, the swampland of Germany couldn't hold the test pillars/drums; same issue for various mega-projects in Germany. Their genius plan was to improve things, then just go for it, is my guess -- and fail horribly within 5 years, is my guess. All of this was to be done by 1950 or so, in a post-victory timeline. Hitler first thought he had totally won by 1940 (and in his defence, he pretty much had, until Churchill arrived on May 10th, 1940. Then he had issues, and was struggling by 1941).

--

Anyway, I thought I'd dig a little deeper. Not only is this interesting history, but may give you some mega-build ideas, too.

I'll maybe make some future posts on the Soviet Union, Rome, English history/architecture, Egypt, and so on.

I'll just cover a few things in this post. I could literally write 50,000 words on Nazi archciture, and be here all day. Let's try to not hit the word cap for this Reddit post, if at all possible!

Strap in, let's do this thing. I'll just do whatever's off the top of my bigbrain (not-so-big, it terms out -- I had to double-check a few details), and post any good images I have on my HDD or can find online.

--

Big Trains & Even Bigger Buildings, for Some Ungodly Reason

Welcome to the utter madness that is Nazi architecture, urban design, and mega-builds. Just to close the loop on Germania: the building that you cannot see, behind the frame, is a massive train station, and was to be converted into the world's largest indoor swimming pool, with the new, even larger train station being not too far away.

Since we're now on the topic of trains, let's start big. Really big.

Reportedly, Hitler hates (fears?) both the sea and air*. But he loves land. Like, really loves it. You cannot believe just how stupidly in love with land he is -- namely, Germanic land (or whatever he claims is and must always be Germanic land). According to his own writings, and various eyewitnesses (less than reliable sources, but the best we have), Hitler had the notion that Germany ought to be a unified land in childhood, I assume stemming from his commoner background, and desire to be among the ruling class (hence, his Communist-like focus on removing the class and caste system from Europe wholesale, as he rants on about for some time during his 1934 rally to the Hitler Youth, if you see the 1945 propaganda film Triumph of the Will).

*My theory is that he's a narcissist, and hates what he cannot control. On top of that, he was ideologically obsessed with a land-based empire, akin to the Chinese and Egyptians, as opposed to Britain and her Royal Navy. Though he was a mixed forced more like the Romans (hence, he brought back the encircling movement, which crushed over 1 million Russians in the Invasion of Russia, only for the Russians to use the same tactic to crush about 2 million Germans by 1943). Anyway, his time at the Battle of the Somme, seeing the tank for the first time (as did Tolkien, though not together, to our knowledge), made him white with rage (as he would reportedly get by Himmler's very careful poking, as Himmler enjoyed doing whenever he wanted Hitler in more of a murderous mood than tactical, logical mood, with Himmler not being the wisest fellow, but one of the cruellest). It would be my understanding that he wanted to crush the British and the world, with their own invention, the tank. He tried as much with Russia, but got snowed in by the early winter and less than ideal strategy (he symbolically tried to take the capital, which was illogical -- he should have gone for the oil fields right away, and divided Russia up the middle, then swept across both fronts. Many experts like to claim that Hitler only invaded Russia for the oil, but this choice actually came about 5 months into the invasion, when he was forced to change tactics, and the British were rapidly bombing all of their factories and oil supplies).

Anyway, he first had the idea -- as you can imagine -- to become a road-based empire like Rome, and usher in his fancy new highways (Autobahn) and car (Volkswagen). Well, it evidently occurred to him by late 1944 or so in the bunker under the New Reich Chancellery, his final resting place (a bit late in the day for such musings, but here we are) that his enemies could simply use the same roads, and also bomb them quite nicely. They're literally massive strips of brown/grey, also known as targets.

No, siree. He became obsessed with the idea of the train, instead. I'm talking Brunel levels of train. A globalised, China-like-concrete-sleeper, holy Batman we're on a moving ocean liner sort of situation.

Fun fact: Experts believe that such a mega-project would have used up the world's supply of concrete for the sleepers/slab foundations, since the train would be too heavy for traditional wood sleepers and loose ballast. I'll repeat that: the world's supply of concrete. All of it. Just for the train network. Now, you're thinking with your 'I'm-with-stupid' T-shirt on! Nice move, Adolf. Then what, no more buildings? Just live on trains, mate.

Fun fact 2: Nope. This one should have been the 'fun fact': some experts think that the maintenance alone would have been more costly than the entire Third Reich's budget. (Of course, Hitler was likely banking on a Nazi world and globalised slave network, which renders the concept of budget, you know. 'No money, no problems?' That sort of thing, but the other way.) We'll return to Nazi budgets soon.

Anyway, let's stop talking about. It's better that I just show you the almost-certainly-impossible scheme of what is adorably and German-ly known as the Breitspurbahn. In other words, 'broad-gauge train network'. Remember I told you about Brunel? Yep. If you go to the Wiki page for 'track gauge', you find only two really wide ones: Brunel (about 7 ft) and Hitler's little bright idea (10 ft). The former fellow was a Victorian visionary, and many of his train-related ideas failed or were horribly inefficient. What do you think about the other fellow? Ding, ding. Even worse. Seriously stupid.

On paper, 'Titanic ocean liner but on tracks' sounds cute. But does it really sound human, or maybe more Star Trek?

The car, as you can see, is about three times larger than a standard train for the time. The network is practically globalised, and the domed train station (model) is, if memory is my strength, the central hub at Munich (City of the Movement, cultural hub of the Reich), and was to be a vast underground station; thus, the dome was empty and just 'for show' -- being the largest dome in history, along with the People's Hall, at about 250 metres (diameter). That's Far Render Distance to you and me...

There are only two other things I want to say about the old 'big train' of it all: first, Hitler wanted to put trains through the Alps. No, not around it. Through the mountains. Now, it sounds crazy and 'mad genius' -- or just the crazy part I mentioned earlier -- but the plot twist is... the world seems to have realised that this was a logical idea, and for the first time, humans have bored through the Alps with the Gotthard Base Tunnel (God, those fellows can really make fun names, can they not. No, really. Can they just not do that, please. Make it interesting, please). He was just a little early is all. The Base Tunnel opened in 2016, as opposed to the proposed 1956+. His other ideas, such as putting a wee bridge from Russia to Alaska/U.S. Not so likely in this century, or maybe any other.

Anyway, the second thing is this: you know how much you love a good shipping container? You know, the big coloured metal boxes you see on ships, and at docks? Hitler pretty much invented that back in the 1930s, but the modern shipping system wasn't actually realised until the 1970s (shockingly late if you think about it). This actually gives great insight into how Nazi Germany was too much even for an evil regime. It's just too much. It's as close as humans will get to robots* (I mean, as living flesh, not simply being replaced by robots. That's a whole other situation).

*Interestingly, some very wise Jews in the camps came to such a profound realisation: the Jews weren't the slaves, but the Nazis. What was his thinking? I mean, if I was stuck in a horrible prison (extra focus on the words 'horrible' and 'prison'), I wouldn't be wise enough to think such things. Not at all. Well, some of the Jews in the camps were philosophers and psychologists and writers, and had a lot of time on their hands. What was their genius thinking? It's simple: yes, the Nazis are outside the fence, but they're also the most unfree of people on the Earth, circa 1942. They're told what to think and what to feel, what to believe, and how to shape their bodies, and at what time. I cannot recall in particular a name, but he came to the realisation that, though he was trapped in the camp, his mind and soul were free, where the Nazi was self-imprisoned.

Note: I did read that it got so bad by 1940 in Berlin, etc., that many of the Nazis simply stopped small talk entirely. Hitler had declared at one point that to cry about the bad weather, such as rain, for example, was a direct attack on the Führer himself, and therefore, punishable by prison or death. Well, naturally, people didn't talk about the weather after that. And, most remarkably -- they didn't just stop talking negatively about the weather, they stopped talking about it altogether. Imagine the New Yorkers or Londoners never talking about the weather? Absurd. It's a vital part of daily life for millions.

Anyway, where was I? Oh, yes. Shipping containers. So, let's go back to the 1920s for a moment. Imagine one of those busy, new-founded New York docks, bringing in all the goods of the world, and endless building supplies for the new skyscrapers. Fascinating stuff. But now imagine that they're all in big wooden crates, and the crates are every which way, and every size possible. What a logistics nightmare.

Let's jump, then, to Hitler's Germany circa 1938. The not-fully-rolled-out system of the unified crate was offered. Imagine a strict assembly line of workers at both ends. Imagine almost every crate being identical. They saved a lot of time doing this, and figured that the future Reich would require such a globalised system if it was to function at all.

As I said, this indicates the true depths of the Nazi regime. Just how stupidly powerful and fast-paced does your empire have to be, if you need to invent a whole new, hyperefficient shipping system, far outpacing that of New York City, the world's leading and fastest-growing city? Well, this all makes sense when we realise that the two are in leagues, both the transport or freight, and the train network.

The shipping system was primarily for military purposes, as were the trains. Either direct combat or invasion. Secondary reasons and benefits were for workers, holidays, and simply connecting the edges of the Third Reich. They were more by-products than expressed intentions, however.

--

HOTEL FOR DAYS

Speaking of which, let's now turn to the world's largest hotel. No, not Sin City or L.A., or the ones in Asia. The Nazi one, of course. Prora. 10,000 rooms.

Plot twist? (God, can this guy give us a break? Nope. It's Hitler we're talking about.)

The plot twist is, the hotel ended being (meh) maybe 1.5 star? Not ideal, anyway. The second plot twist? Sure, German citizens could enjoy it as a fairly cheap holiday for the day (circa 1938), but it was for Reich factory workers and so on. Fair enough. Workers need a holiday. What's wrong with this image?

Well... it also doubled-up (main purpose, rather). Let's just say Hitler loved his soldiers. Yep. You guessed it. Training camp (yay). Massive army base nearby (yay). I mean, is it really 'going to a hotel somewhere for a nice holiday' if the primary function of the place is even more miliary training and propaganda education, and military displays/marches? (We'll return to this idea in a moment.)

Oh, look... a hotel, or something? It's one of the longest buildings (complexes) in the world, on a small island to the north of Germany, if I can recall. It's split into three blocks. There are these tower things with stairwells, and rooms all facing the ocean, and some swimming pool/courtyard areas behind. Off to the side, you'd also see the adorable training camps and there would have been massive Nazi flags everywhere you looked (you know, just in case you forgot).

--

Into the Interior, and Above

I said I'll return to the idea of budgets, and also military displays. I feel like I'm running out of writing space here, so I'll wrap this up with both.

The first thing was the New Reich Chancellery, the final resting place of Hitler. He fled into the bunker here and lived his final 105 days or whatsoever. Amusingly, I looked up a diagram, since I was interested in his interpersonal relationships. He had his own room, and his soon-to-be-wife (and secret mistress from the public) Eva Braun had a room far away in the bunker. Himmler and some others were also down there, and Himmler took his own life here, as well (hence, he wasn't at the 1945–1946 trials, unlike Goring and co.). Goebells had already taken his own life at his home, and killed his wife and four children in the process (poison) as to avoid the Red Army. Hitler burnt his body for the same reason. I believe they had heard about the horrors of what happened to Musoslin's corpse, and didn't want to be defiled in public like that. In case of Goebbels, he simply wanted to avoid being horribly tortured and killed, and what would happen to his young daughters by the Soviets soldiers (they heard rumours that they were the most savage army on the planet, hoarding their way through Europe at lightening speed).

Notice how Hitler's office is very Blade Runner-like in its simple design, yet it speaks volumes in its over-the-top, ornate construction. Almost every inch of the place is covered in pink granite, acting as red marble (Hitler's favourite, and he often pretended that all of this was marble. In his Eagle's Nest, the fireplace is famously made of red marble -- a gift from Mussolini). Above you can see one of the main entrances (edifice), and the entrance to Hitler's office. Note that he personally liked the rounded Greek-style pillars over the strictly Troost/Speer squared pillars you see elsewhere in Nazi Germany. Finally, you can see the long gallery (floor-to-ceiling windows, evenly spaced, also covered in pink granite).

Speer built the New Reich Chancellery in 1938, and was given exactly 1 year. Speer later wrote that he had 48 hours remaining (though we cannot know if this was true or one of his arrogant tales yet again). We do know that he was great at admin and time-keeping in general, when it came to mega-projects. 4,500 skilled workers worked in shifts (24 hours). The cost was profound. But here's the meaningful part:

In today's terms, it's not unthinkable -- maybe 500 million Euros. Not even close to the most costly governmental building, but it was at the time.

Here's the real insight, however: Speer was told -- as he enjoyed being told -- by Hitler that 'cost was immaterial'. That's code for, 'we'll just use the national funds and blood money -- there literally isn't a cap. We have endless wealth and manpower'.

Let's pause for a moment. Although Germany had a very iffy market system, it was semi-stable and very rich in a real sense by 1936 (height of pre-war for Hitler, after the 1936 Games). The problems already started to come by 1937, however. As all utopian life must, it became bloated, gleeful, and complacent. They couldn't remain stable and grow at the same time. Hitler wanted 200+ million Germans. Hitler wanted Europe. Hitler wanted heated flooring. Hitler wanted the Moon (literally, possibly). So, their plans to invade began in earnest with secret 1937 meetings and the drafting of the little black books (names of Poles to remove upon invasion; the same for Britain came later, though Hitler called off the invasion of Britain at the last minute). Hitler gave the illusion of a free market system, but actually controlled the companies. In other words, it was a mixed system, more in keeping with a modern Communist structure. The people merely had the illusion of freedom. Every artist. Every film-maker. Every factory. They were all approved and at least indirectly controlled by the government. They literally had a department called 'Propaganda Ministry', led by Goebbels, famed propagandist behind the 1928–1931 efforts, posters, and schemes along with Hitler, which led to the Party going from the lowest to the second-most popular Party (and, remember, at this point, 'propaganda' wasn't a bad word, and they didn't try to hide it at all).

So, most of Germany's wealth was paper thin by 1938, which explains why the entire system fell in on itself by 1941 due to the war (unlike that of the British Empire and France, etc.). So, Hitler took Germany from dirt poor in 1933 to the second-richest nation on Earth by 1938, to pretty much the poorest advanced nation by 1945. Great work, there, Adolf.

The Long Gallery is twice the length of the one at Versailles (of course. Why not). So, that makes it 150 metres long (good luck building that puppy in Beta). Speer noted that Hitler remarked: 'On the long walk from the entrance to the reception hall they'll get a taste of the power and grandeur of the German Reich!'

--

The Airport of All Airports

Finally, the military displays aspect. There is no greater example than (new) Tempelhof, dubbed the 'mother of all airports', and the greatest airport in history. Built on Knights Templar ground (hence, the name -- 'tempel' and 'hof', meaning 'land' or 'courtyard').

It's a quadrant (in essence, half of a half of a circle), and looks like the shape of an eagle in flight. It's 1,000 metres long, and has the world's largest canopy roof, extending over the airstrip, protecting passengers from the elements. It's in the typical Stripped Classicism style, yet again. Very 'dry', very 'stern', very 'boxed in', very 'governmental'. It was the most advanced airport in the world, and helped create some of the foundations of crowd control and general layouts, that we still use today. Shell limestone exterior and partial interior, once again.

At the top, you can see an endless crowd of 1.5 million for a Hitler speech (likely the opening of the new airport, but I could be wrong). The latter is a model. Unlike most of the buildings in this post, this is a real building that they actually built. And it did well into the 1970s, in fact.

Yep, you guessed it. A chief function of the new tempelhof design was military parades. But this time, in the sky (yay, big planes). This sounds a lot like the hotel situation... and the train situation... oh, forget it. Just show me men marching in lockstep, for the millionth time. How boring must the speeches have been, once you see through the Germanic frenzy and swaying of the vast crowds? Very. And they lasted for 7 hours in many cases! (Even Goebbels reports that Hitler was very dry and overly focused on dishing out German history to the crowds. He hardly even bothered listening to him, just claps and cheers when told.)

I think some of you have already got the sense that Nazi Germany is just a way worse, more depressing version of Rome/Athens. You'd be correct. It's just an orderless Greco-Roman style (i.e. Stripped Classicism, no Doric order, etc. to be seen -- only implied in some cases, and in some cases not even implied. Just a stone box. Fun. Not). These are some of the best examples of what they had to offer in the sense of actual design. And some of them are horrible pieces of design, such as the People's Hall.

Let's just say, their housing complexes left something to be desired. Imagine Ancient Egypt's bland, squared housing complexes. Now, cry. And imagine that it was like that for 2+ million people in the city hubs (such as Germania) instead of merely 30,000 people of Men-Nefer, for example. That about sums it up nicely. God, it's depressing me just thinking about it. Hitler seriously did not see people as people. He didn't even see them as pawns, so much as the squares on the chessboard (my most profound concern is that Hitler actually saw himself as the pawn, and the knights and kings and queens of the board were the future people looking back, awe-inspired by the ruins of Germany, as we now look upon the ruins of Rome). 'Delusional' doesn't quite cut it with this guy.

--

Actually, this is my final note, and may shed some more light on the issue:

'Ruinenwert' is a term invented by Speer, though the concept predates him (see: Bank of London). It's Hitler's fetish around so-called 'ruin value'. This drive certainly was invented by Speer/Hitler, to my knowledge. This is why the 1936 Games stadium was glass-less. Hitler wanted only stone. Only materials that would look good as ruins, 1,000 years hence. This also explains, in my view, the oddity of the House of Art or Haus Der Kunst. If you read The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich book, you see that William notes that the Haus Der Kunst was dried-up, already outdated, and boring beyond belief, compared with the so-named Degenerate art display that was also held at the same time in 1936. But this makes some sense, if we view it from the viewpoint of a people already looking back on themselves, in the present moment. This is the alien nature of Hitler: he wasn't building a 'living empire', but rather a 'living museum'. In this sense, Haus Der Kunst looks to me more like a Roman museum: old bits of stone and classic works of art, and some plates, and not much more. I've not been there myself, and I'm certainly not old enough to have been alive in 1936, but I did read some papers on it and 3D walkthroughs that I found some years ago.

As a result, Nazi Germany was like the inverse of Blade Runner: it wasn't 'lived-in'. It was clean. It was empty. It was lifeless. It aimed to contain what Hitler thought of as the German spirit, as opposed to free it or improve it. It aimed to literally capture the past, and display it as a message in a bottle. Only at the scale of an entire culture. Very strange and unstable idea (hence, Haus Der Kunst was so unpopular even with Nazis that Goebbels quickly shut it down out of shame). And this is where the title of this post came from. You can also clearly see the narcissism of Hitler having heroic paintings of himself in the museum.

See Hitler painting to the right, and heroic Nazi-approved statues lining the entire building, on both floors on the left (with the odd Hitler-approved painting thrown in there, among other smaller displays).

r/TDLH • • Aug 27 '26

Working on this Mecha idea

3 Upvotes

Had this idea for a mecha story idea that is reminiscent of like Aldnoah Zero where the heart of the conflict is between Earth and Mars as the series had potential but feel like it missed the mark while taking inspiration from Eighty Six which honestly was the best Non-Gundam or Non-Code Geass mecha series in a long while.

This is what I was able to work on so far as of 08=27-26:

Possible Titles:

Cities in Cinders

[Name of Mechas] Chronicles

Inspirations:

Eighty Six - The Idea where a Marginalized or Indeginous Population dehumanized to the point where they are nothing more than cannon fodder to them.

Aldnoah Zero - The Ariesians are more or less human colonists who have been around since the 90s and have a much more advanced technology much like the Vers Empire

Armored Core 6 - The Pilots of the Mechas within Zou are borderline treated as nothing more than cannon fodder and disposable

The Mechas:

Generally all of them are the same, 15 meter tall humanoid mechs that lean more on Grunt Suits and rarely we get the Gundam Equivalent as the goal of this story is to be more on Real Robot with little if no Super Robot ideas. Or at least keep the Super Robot influence minimum much like Aldnoah Zero.

Possible Name Ideas:

Aswar/Aswaran - Inspired by the Sasanian Cavalry

Stahlreiters - German meaning Steel Rider

Premise:

A Mecha sci fi story takes place in the year 2088, the ten years since the Ariesian War had begun. A War between Earth Assembly and the Ariesian Federation, and slowly the war is taking a toll on both sides but neither still wishes to give up or surrender.

In the United Republics of Greater Zou, they are currently the front Southeastern front of the war with their Autonomous Mobile Forces (in reality they are non Zou Citizens who are promised Citizenship in exchange for being mech pilots) as they are being the last front in the Southeast that is preventing the Ariesians from invading what’s left of Earth.

Possible Ideas:

The Protagonists are Feng Jia and Joseph Mercado, the former is a Young Officer within the Zou Army and the young Captain of a Squad of Autonomous Mobile Forces. That is implied to be nations that they were fighting over the Nine-Dash-Line (maybe even do a homage to Eighty Six and Code Geass by calling them Niners).

The whole premise is inspired by Eighty Six and Code Geass: Akito the Exiled where the emotional plotline focuses on the bond between a sympathetic commanding officer and a commander of a marginalized and dehumanized population. Examples being Vladilena Milize and Shinei Nouzen in Eighty Six alongside Leila Marcal and Akito Hyuga in Akito the Exiled

It is also possible that the 2088 is actually from an alternate timeline where the diverging point was the 1960s but slightly enough that the events from 1965-2027 are still similar.

Much like Eighty Six, the ‘Ariesian Federation’ is actually internally divided where one faction is morally gray while the other one is borderline similar to the Vers Empire who is a supremacist faction who thinks as the ones who survived on Mars then they have the right to govern Earth.

Though in terms of morality I think not a single nation is morally good, Zou is the worst alongside the Ariesian federation. Some nations condemn Zou but do nothing, some nations are against Ariesia but do nothing.


r/TDLH • • Aug 09 '26

Video Return to Castle Wolfenstein Analysis Part 25: Asgard and The Tower

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes

r/TDLH • • Jul 28 '26

Video Return to Castle Wolfenstein Analysis Part 24: Vril Society and Hel

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes

r/TDLH • • Jul 21 '26

Video Return to Castle Wolfenstein Analysis part 23: Grendel's Mother and the Moon

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes

r/TDLH • • Jul 08 '26

Video Return to Castle Wolfenstein Analysis Part 21: The Swastika and the Pentagram

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes

r/TDLH • • Jun 25 '26

Video Return to Castle Wolfenstein Analysis Part 19: Simon Magus and the Chaos of Mother Earth

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes

r/TDLH • • Jun 12 '26

Review Lee Cronin's The Mummy 2026 Review: Like Being Dragged Upstairs in a Wheelchair

16 Upvotes

Horror movies are not what they used to be. Despite movie budgets continuing to skyrocket for absolutely no reason, the “low-budget horror movie” is still something that will take several million dollars to make. The company Blumhouse became famous for making Paranormal Activity (2007) for $200k, turning it into almost $200M, resulting in a massive trend of found footage films that tried to repeat the same thing. Yes, the low budget horror movie has always been a thing, but that was the moment people started to treat it as the only thing we can have. Major studios have given up on horror, unless that horror is something Disney can give the Avengers treatment or is yet another failed reboot.

Here, we have a combination of all three, where a major studio title, The Mummy, was turned into the quality of a found footage film, all because Blumhouse doesn’t know anything else. Rather than going into the history about how James Wan, Eli Roth, and Jason Blum are the sole reason horror movies are absolutely God awful for the last 20 years, I would rather go into a quick history of The Mummy films so that people can understand my obvious disappointment. You bet your sweet ass I’m giving Lee Cronin’s The Mummy a negative review, but I want people to understand why my position is different from someone who never bothered with the previous films in the lineup. This isn’t about nostalgia or even preservation of an IP. All I want to go over is why the Mummy is a famous title and why this movie shits all over that name.

In 1932, The Mummy was made by Universal as an original monster movie, to follow up their success with their gothic monsters: Dracula and the Frankenstein monster (who’s later named Frankenstein to save space but caused confusion). The real inspiration was when Tutankhamun’s Tomb was opened up in 1922 and people believed in a curse from the numerous deaths involved with it. Later on, we found out that it was from ancient diseases sealed within and complete coincidence, but the legend of the curse was enough to make a movie about Imhotep and his quest to revive his dead lover. The process was a ritual to take the reincarnation of his dead lover, use magic to bring back her older form, and kill the current woman in the process. The idea of “the bride” was later used for multiple monster movies in order to create a damsel in distress for our hero to save, exemplifying the romantic element in the gothic monster genre.

Something important that was lost through time: Imhotep was not used as the mummy again until the 1999 reboot. Instead, we had the trend of using Kharis, beginning with The Mummy’s Hand(1940), all the way to the Hammer Film reboot in 1959. While Imhotep was a high priest punished for using magic for immortality, Kharis has a similar background as a prince who wanted to revive a princess with tana leaves, but was killed before he could perform his ritual, and instead uses the same tana leaves to lumber about as a corpse. The cliche idea of a mummy comes from Kharis, with his arms out and his body fully wrapped in bandages, very reminiscent of Boris Karloff’s Frankenstein monster; ironically when his rendition of Imhotep in the first movie was more eloquent and civilized. After the 1959 reboot, Kharis was changed out with a new mummy every installment, each one being more lame than the last.

The Curse of the Mummy’s Tomb (1964) had Ra-Antef (son of a Pharaoh), The Mummy’s Shroud (1967) had a prince’s servant named Prem, and then Blood from the Mummy’s Tomb (1971) is where we have our first female mummy named Tera. As dumb as Blood from the Mummy’s Tomb was, it’s probably the best of the hammer films because it has Valerie Leon’s massive hooters, and boy do they let you know she has them. The 1999 reboot is where The Mummy became an epic with the threat of the world ending. It’s also where we get the best onscreen couple, Rick O’Connell and Evelyn Carnahan. This was a trilogy that fizzled out in the third movie because of massive cast changes and a shift to China that didn’t make much sense.

The Mummy(2017) reboot was a massive disaster that tried to combine the end of the world scale with a female mummy named Ahmanet, but the studio ruined all of it by trying to have it jumpstart a Dark Universe series by forcing Dr. Jekyll into the mix and having Tom Cruise combine with the Egyptian god of death to have none of it make any sense. The only key thing to remember from this one is that Ahmanet became a mummy because she was betrayed by her father over a new son being born, so she made a pact with Set (the god of death) and murdered her family. As shocking as it may sound, this one resembles the Lee Cronin Mummy the most. Yes, you read that correctly: the crappy Tom Cruise movie that everyone made fun of is the one they took the most inspiration from. But instead of trying to make a $200M disaster like the 2017 film, they reduced the budget to $22M by casting random actors and having it all take place in a single location… which is more like 3 locations but they’re all houses.

So what did they accomplish with this reboot having 13 films to use as reference points? Well…

The movie begins with a silly Egyptian song, Kamasa Stany by Sharmoofers, with a happy Egyptian family singing along to it in a car. What appears like a road trip is actually a drive back to a secluded farm in the middle of the desert. This movie tries to let us know that it’s the current year, but also that we’re in an isolated location. It also lets us know something bad happened by having the family see a dead bird in a cage. This “indicator” is never used ever again and is never mentioned again.

The mother of the family, unnamed and known only as The Magician, goes into a nearby tunnel with the father, telling the kids to stay in the house. Under their house is a giant cave that holds a heavy sarcophagus, requiring a pulley system to lift the lid. We get a lame jumpscare and the lid falls back down, somehow breaking the pulley system and the father is lifted up by one of the hooks going through his jaw. This gore gag is used twice in the movie, to people in the same family, both for absolutely no reason. Then the title card screams at us to act as yet another jumpscare.

As bored as I sound with the description, this opening isn’t too bad at establishing the mystery of the mummy. We are told this movie is going to be boring, then full of jumpscares, and then gory just for the sake of being gross. That is pretty much all we get from the entire movie, so at least the opening is appropriate. I also wouldn’t mind if the whole thing was about an Egyptian family being the protagonists. Instead, we shift over to an American family who’s in Egypt because the father, Charlie (played by Jack Raynor), is a journalist who’s covering something we’re not meant to care about.

In fact, we’re only supposed to care that Charlie worries about using his hands too much when he’s talking. This aspect is never spoken of ever again.

His pregnant wife, Larissa (played by Laia Costa), is a nurse who works at a local hospital and is perhaps the most confusing thing in this entire movie. The name Larissa is Greek, so I thought he married a local gal and that’s why Charlie is in Egypt. NOPE. She’s meant to be a Mexican from Arizona who is played by an actress from Catalan, and she didn’t sound Mexican at all. Also, she’s 41, while Jack is only 34, and boy does the age difference show. I guess this is the only thing they wanted to copy from Tomb of the Dragon Emperor, where all of their ages are more wonky than the set of Grease.

Don’t get me wrong, there’s TONS of bad acting, but she was the worst, and the age was the least of my worries.

The plot starts when their daughter Katie (played by Emily Mitchell as a child and Natalie Grace for the rest of the film), is learning Morse code for an Egyptian girl scout badge, but then runs over to the garden after feeling like her family doesn’t care about her. She feels that because her brother broke one of her dolls and her father tried to fix it, but that wasn’t enough because she wanted her brother to get yelled at. This is never mentioned ever again, except for the Morse code when it becomes a major plot point. When she is in the garden, she waits for her local friend, who is unable to visit and has her mother come visit in her place.

The movie tries to get us to understand that this is The Magician from earlier, by showing her scary teeth through a hole in the fence, but the lady wasn’t presented as evil and mysterious in the intro, so I didn’t understand this part at all until later. She gives Katie some candy and a nectarine, to then use a magical spell that summons a scarab from the nectarine that goes into Katie’s mouth and knocks her out. This nectarine is never used again, the scarab is never used again, and the only reason this happens is so they can leave evidence for the nectarine farm to be found later. But that evidence wasn’t needed because they already had the name and address of the person, and a nectarine is the stupidest thing to connect people with. There isn’t even a theme tied to a nectarine, other than Harpocrates being tied to both the nectarine and childhood.

So you’d have to know some obscure fact about Egyptian mythology, that’s never mentioned, and also doesn’t apply to this movie’s mythology, to figure out that a child is given a nectarine because of an Egyptian god that’s related to childhood, which has nothing to do with the story.

While Katie is being kidnapped and groomed, Charlie finds a bunch of candy bar wrappers in Katie’s dollhouse, which he was looking at for no reason. Finding a bunch of hidden wrappers makes him instantly run to the garden and see Katie get dragged through a hole in the fence. This leads to a chase where Charlie asks Egyptian people (in English) if they’ve seen his daughter and sirens start going off about a sandstorm. The noise is supposed to make the scene more intense and the sandstorm is there to obstruct everything and have The Magician get away, but it’s never explained if The Magician caused the sandstorm or if that was a coincidence. This entire scene only happens so that they can give reference to the London sandstorm from The Mummy (2017), which was a reference to the sandstorm face chase from The Mummy (1999).

And again, there is no indication that magic caused it, so this was put in the movie with less relevance than the scarab (a creature that famously came in swarms and killed people in the 1999 movie).

We are then introduced to Detective Dalia Zaki (played by May Calawawy), who you might recognize as Scarlet Scarab from the Moon Knight mini series, assuming anyone watched that hunk of shit. Her superior officer tells her that Cairo has a bad history with finding missing children, because they’re almost always found dead. But, if she finds this one alive, she’ll get promoted. This part of the movie is never mentioned again. The two talk in Egyptian, right in front of the grieving family, with the superior suspecting the parents accidentally killed their child and reporting it as a missing child to hide the evidence.

Charlie, who now magically understands Egyptian almost flawlessly, gets angry and the scene cuts away while he’s yelling. I didn’t have a good spot to mention this before, but every scene ends this way. Something happens, we aren’t sure where they’re going with it, then a small peak of interest, something loud happens, then it cuts to the next scene. This is the worst offender of this habit since we go from Charlie spitting while he yells to him sitting down quietly in front of a projector… 8 years later. Before the kidnapping, he was happy that he was going to get a job in New York and become famous or something.

This event caused him to have a really crappy job in journalism, but he later on claims to be a producer for the company, and it’s not clear what his new job is. I think he became an editor, despite being a FUCKING JOURNALIST who HAD HIS DAUGHER KIDNAPPED in a location INFAMOUS FOR KIDNAPPINGS. I thought he was going to use his journalism connections to seek the truth and dive into the Egyptian underworld to deal with gangs and kidnappers. The movie sets itself up to be like Egyptian Death Wish, but Charlie is so stupid that he decides to settle for an office job and live in Albuquerque, New Mexico with his Mexican mother in law. You think I’m fucking joking, but we literally had an Irish director, of all people, tell a producer that the series, famous for taking place in Egypt and England, is now going to be about coyote country.

This is the part of the movie where I said “Oh no…” really loud in the movie theater and thank god nobody else was there to hear it. I know I’m spoiling the surprise, but this movie barely made $90M in the box office, so it’s not like I’m making fun of a blockbuster.

Everyone is older, the next daughter named Maude is born, and we meet the grandmother (played by Veronica Falcon). This is yet another vocal moment where now I said “what the hell is that thing?” because I had no idea who Veronica is and the makeup they gave her made me think it was a dude in drag. If you were curious like I was, she worked with Blumhouse before with The Forever Purge as Lydia and she was Trader Sam in Jungle Cruise; two movies that I and a lot of other people had the pleasure of skipping out on. If you really want to know what she’s famous for, it’s a bunch of random tellanovellas, which seems to be the key audience they were going for with this movie.

We get comfortable in her house and the parents make note that they have a room for Katie that was never touched since her kidnapping, which makes no sense because they weren’t living in this house back when she was alive. I think they mentioned a grandma’s house in the beginning, but I don’t remember anything about this during their time in Cairo and it would have been during a bunch of meaningless noise. It’s pretty ridiculous that this movie wants us to pay attention to the mother pregnant, the father using his hands too much, the son being obsessed with parachutes, the daughter learning Morse Code, and then an entire other family doing their own thing, all to pray someone heard something about New Mexico somewhere in that mess of mumbling and jumpscares.

The following will sound confusing because, again, the editing of this movie makes watching it absolutely painful, especially with how awful the lighting is. We have a random Mexican-looking guy in the desert, and I think his car broke down. He starts speaking Egyptian (surprising me because he looks like Pablo from Evil Dead), interrupted by a plane exploding behind him. The plane falls directly downward into the nearby forest, he goes to investigate, and this is where he finds the second mouth-hook death with the pilot killed by a tree. This is also where he finds a sarcophagus standing straight up.

I didn’t understand the sarcophagus was IN the plane until near the end of the movie. What it looks like is that the sarcophagus was in the middle of the forest, then a plane tried to fly by, went directly above it, then exploded as it went straight down. That made sense to me because I figured it had some evil barrier magic thing. What actually happened is that the sarcophagus was in the plane, the pilots were the two little Egyptian boys singing in the car 8 years ago, and the sarcophagus landed straight up for no reason. This is also a good moment to express how the Egyptian family and the American family are meant to reflect each other with how they both have 3 kids and they both get attached to this evil mummy thing.

The only real saving grace this movie has is held within the family dynamics between Charlie and The Magician, with both of them having a particular relationship with their daughters, respectively. Charlie has his daughter kidnapped from the garden, while The Magician tries to force the family secret onto her own daughter and punishes her for trying to escape their cursed existence of containing this curse. I know I’m skipping ahead, but the whole thing is happening because the Egyptian family wanted to contain a curse and they were willing to do anything to contain it, believing that they are saving the world. In a way, the entire plot heavily resembles the famous short story, The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas, where a child is kept in darkness and misery as the sacrifice for a city to have constant splendor. But this movie does it in such a stupid way that I can sort of appreciate the attempt, but not the execution.

In the sarcophagus that came from the crashed plane is Katie, who is now 17 years old. Lucky for her, she was able to skip middle school and high school, but at the cost of her body being covered in wrappings, her skin is all clammy, and she’s in a catatonic state. Very similar to being homeschooled.  When the Egyptian doctor explains all of this, they make his face very creepy and they have this dim lighting that resembles a prison. In fact, at the end of the movie, we see a prison hospital and it’s the exact same concrete building. They also use this muffled effect for how Katie hears people that keeps making me think her ears are just clogged with ear wax.

It’s been 8 years. She’s bound to have something waxy in one of her holes.

Now, I’m not giving the whole description of Katie any justice because she looks like a walking corpse. We are also told that she didn’t see any sunlight, was malnourished, and immobile for the 8 years she was gone, but her vitals are all perfectly fine. The mother, who’s a nurse, and the doctor, who’s a doctor, didn’t see anything medically weird about this. Everything in this movie is delivered with the same energy as “well… that happened”, only to cut to another scene before the previous scene could finish its thought. I think the goal was to make things fly by faster, but then it ended up being a 2 hour movie for something that should be an episode of Goosebumps.

The only reason this movie is so long is because every scene takes 10mins to rev up and runs for barely a minute before it’s shifted to the next scene in the middle of a sentence. A great example is how we’re slowly shown that Katie needs to be dragged up the stairs by her wheelchair, to then be thrown on the bed, then she freaks out when she sees the cross on the grandmother’s necklace, to then headbutt her grandmother, and this quickly cuts over to the grandmother sleeping with a broken nose. The point of the scene was to show the family struggling to take care of a person who’s damaged, but then results in her no longer being sympathetic, to then shift the idea about how the grandmother is going to die because she’s talking about Jesus. All we needed was the part about taking care of Katie, not the other stuff. But they didn’t have anything scary to do for a while, so they had to pretend Katie is scary as someone who can headbutt an old lady. 

And everyone in the movie pretends like this headbutt never happened… the second after it happens.

The middle of this movie is such a cluttered mess that I can’t remember what happens when, but it’s this hodgepodge of taking care of Katie, chasing her around the inner walls of the house (similar to the walls in The Boy), trying to cut her long toe nails, we see a bunch of coyotes, and Charlie finds a bandage caught in the wheelchair’s spoke. Katie has these long, disgusting nails that grew over the course of 8 years, making her seem threatening with her claws. But, when the mother tries to cut her big toenail, it splits Katie’s skin up to her knee, taking the whole nail right off, and Katie freaks out into a rage that is only soothed by some kind of tranquilizer injection. They put that in the movie only to be gross and sometime around this moment we have Charlie and Larissa argue about who is the worse parent. The family was happy that Katie’s back for like 5 minutes until they had to take care of her, and now she is this massive burden that forces everyone to be as stressed as possible.

The main theme here is that a family tragedy becomes a massive burden, with everyone pointing fingers and few willing to find solutions. Charlie is the first one to say they should get rid of Katie, with Larissa hoping that Katie will be back to normal in due time. But if we think about this for a second, any sane person would use their journalism connections or their medical education to press the matter to the most extreme degree. Why not question the medical impossibility of this or make this into global news? The family pretends this is both normal and that it should be kept a secret, with the grandmother saying almost nothing except for random thoughts and prayers.

The other children are even more useless with Sebastian ignoring everything, and all Maude can do is be scared of Katie’s room as she runs to take a piss.

Charlie finds this wrapping on Katie that might be her skin and might not be. It’s hard to tell. All I can tell is that it’s wet, looks kind of leathery, and has a bunch of weird symbols on it. Charlie has the bright idea to take photos of the wrapping to a local college professor, who finds out that it’s a scripture more ancient than hieroglyphics -- depicting the legend of a demon called Nasmaranian. This demon’s entire goal is to destroy families and… that’s about it. 

In fact, it does its job anyway by destroying the families of whoever tries to contain it, since that’s what happens in the movie.

The reason I’m confused as to whether the symbols were on a piece of wrapping or skin is because the mummy wrapping they put on Katie will embed the symbols onto the person’s skin to contain the demon, and so the demon will be trapped in their body until they die of old age. This particular piece was a long strip that had several layers of symbols on top of one another, so I’m still not sure what it was. What I am sure about is that the excuse for why they used Katie for the mummification process is absolutely stupid. Not the part about using a child, because that makes sense when it comes to time. What is stupid is that The Magician used an American child because they figured nobody would find out, even though Katie’s father was a famous news reporter and they are in a city that’s already plagued by a history of unsolved kidnapping cases.

I know the movie forced a semi-American family into the mix so that an American audience can feel sympathy for someone less brown than an Egyptian. But if that’s the issue, then DON’T have your story about Egypt! Hollywood is so stupid with this diversity nonsense, because they’re stuck in trying to film outside of the US(to save money), while assuming Americans are too racist to watch people speak a different language than Californian and Mexican. So we’re forced to hear this awful dialogue in Egyptian, then ping pongs between broken English and broken Spanish, with half the movie in subtitles for something that didn’t need to be foreign to begin with. I think this is also the moment I have to explain why Lee Cronin is not only a lazy director, but a very terrible one at that.

So far, Lee has only made 3 movies: The Hole in the Ground, Evil Dead Rise, and this piece of garbage.

If you’ve seen either of the other 2 movies… you’ve seen all 3 movies. The Hole in the Ground is about a boy who falls in a sinkhole in the countryside and acts possessed (actually a doppelganger). Evil Dead Rise is about a girl whose mother gets possessed by deadites and they fight in an apartment. This movie is about a girl who gets possessed by a demon and tries to make a sandstorm in a house that’s in the New Mexican desert. The only thing that changes between these movies is who is dealing with the possession, the location, and how they exercise the same exact demon. 

It’s the same turd sandwich, but with different sauces and this one tries to add Tapatio. 

While Charlie is finding out about demons, the grandma gets killed by Katie throwing her through the second-story window with magic pushing powers. One second, she has the power to throw people out the window with her mind and also turn Maude into a mindless servant, and then the next second she’s helpless again. Before you can question how stupid this is, the grandmother flies directly onto the car as Charlie is coming back home with the other kids, and the grandmother is INSTANTLY eaten by coyotes while she’s still alive. Also, Maude (possessed by Katie) is laughing at the carnage from the back seat and nobody cares. Then comes the worst part of the film: the funeral scene.

Yes, just like Beetlejuice Beetlejuice, it has a funeral scene that goes nowhere fast.

To explain the funeral scene, we have to go back like 1 hour and remind ourselves that there is a puddle of something bloody that forms under a carpet in Katie’s room. This was shown in a random scene where Charlie notices it and says nothing about it. I thought it was supposed to be vomit or something, and it’s really easy to miss because Katie is always getting everything slimy and bloody anyway. So we take this Family Guy style cutaway gag, carry it over to the funeral, where Katie’s room is somehow directly above the living room where the funeral is taking place. No, I’m not bullshitting you: the family is meant to be poor and forced to live with their grandmother, but they can afford a house funeral.

The movie tries to be funny with the grandma’s snooty old lady friends, they’re forgetful, and Maude pulls out a loose tooth, transferring this to her pulling out almost all of her teeth. There’s a scene earlier where Maude mentions having a loose baby tooth, but the scene where all of her teeth are missing is forgotten by the end of the movie. Also, nobody reacted to her literally pulling her own teeth out, which is caused by Katie losing parts of her wrappings (that are part of her skin or something). Katie falls through the rotting floor, I think she knocks over the coffin, but I clearly remember the grandmother’s dentures fall out and Maude puts them in her mouth to bite some random guy. The guy has no damage on him, so the scene cuts away to nighttime and the house is back to normal like nothing happened.

Nobody mentions how the police had to be involved or their local reputation is ruined; it’s just… ignored. And you might be thinking “the grandma dies and they go straight to the funeral”, right? No! The movie actually shoved in the key plot points between these two, making zero sense why it’s progressing this way.

After Katie kills her grandma, she is back to her lazy mode and uses Morse code to give Charlie the name “Layla”. Dalia, who’s back in Egypt still trying to solve the case, tells him that it’s too common of a first name, so they need an address or a last name. Charlie runs over to a box of unopened letters and finds one from Layla, that also has a candy wrapper inside it for no reason, and Layla puts her last name ON the letter for no reason. No address is given, just a last name and there is no actual way they could have received the letter from the lack of a return address. All of this leads to Dalia finding the nectarine farm, the hidden tunnel, the pulley system, she slooooooowly gets attacked by The Magician and is forced to shoot her, AND THEN she chases down Layla.

This investigation and farm part is like 30 mins that didn’t need to exist because Dalia was supposed to do her job and didn’t do it. Every part of this is extended by like 5 mins to bleed out the run time. Layla runs away for no reason and is almost killed, but the reason they give us is because Layla had her tongue cut out when she tried to reveal their secret, so she buried a VHS tape somewhere next to the house that is by a cliff. Remember: The Magician doesn’t want their secret revealed, so she makes a VHS tape of the ENTIRE RITUAL… that has like a dozen people involved for no reason. Layla gives a full confession about the crimes, in writing, and she’s forgotten right after.

So the reason they put a 30min gap between grandma dead and grandma’s funeral is so that we can delay the reveal of why the family was doing their ritual. What’s more stupid is that they tried to delay it while Dalia is watching the VHS, because she tries to watch it in a broom closet that has a TV with weird nobs that somehow messed up the audio. What we see is that this is a secret the family holds, and we were told about Nasmaranian from a different source, and the only thing that is delayed is how the ritual is done. I thought they were going to keep the ritual mysterious on purpose to make it actually scary, but then they had Dalia travel over to New Mexico to show the family the VHS tape as directly as possible. With all this talk about everyone having a VCR, you might be wondering: what time period are they in?

The goal was to make it the 2020s, but the technological limitations say 90s, while AI will say it’s the 2010s. I have no fucking clue what year they’re supposed to be in with this story. This is one of the stupidest things with horror now, where having technology up to date is seen as impossible because they want technology to look scary. It’s like in Evil Dead Rise where a random kid is messing around with a record player, specifically for the ability to use an old record from the 1920s. They have this idea of a plot point and then they force the entire world to fit this idea, instead of the other way around.

So we have the funeral, Sebastian gets possessed by Katie right after, and then Dalia comes over to show the parents the video tape. While the parents are watching their daughter get mummified like it’s a snuff film, Sebastian sneaks through the inner walls to reach Katie in her room and “undress her”. They try to make it sound incestuous and creepy, but the dialogue is so hammy that it comes off like Katie is too lazy to pull off her own wrappings. And remember, Katie can use a knife to scratch at her skin, throw people out a window with her mind, and possess her siblings through the door, but she can’t open the locks on her door or take off her wrappings. Yes, they tried to lock Katie in her room with a bunch of locks after the funeral, and now the giant hole in the floor is magically gone, but they didn’t lock the crawl space that Katie used earlier in the movie.

Also… she could have just used the crawl space.

This leads to the climax, where the parents know what happened and get insight on how the ritual goes about. Katie finally knocks the door down with a sandstorm, she attacks her father by biting his neck, and Sebastian beats his mother up with a metal bat. Dalia doesn’t have a gun anymore (or she had it knocked away, can’t remember), so she gets into a fight with the revived grandma, and the grandma vomits a scorpion into her mouth. You might be wondering “how did the grandma get possessed and the parents are still untouched?” Well, that’s not important, because we have to show you that Dalia gets her throat penetrated by a scorpion’s tail for no reason.

Larissa injects Sebastian with a tranquilizer, Maude is forgotten about, and Charlie gets the idea to have Dalia repeat the words from the ritual to channel the spirit into himself. Dalia croaks out the words after a very brief struggle, Charlie becomes the possessed one, and everyone turns back to normal. He’s put into a sarcophagus (that had no way of being shipped to the US) and tells his family that he loves them with Morse code. Everyone’s body went back to normal like nothing happened, except for Dalia who had her throat damaged. The movie ends with The Magician in a prison hospital (after she was shot by Dalia) and they wheel in a wrapped up Charlie to channel the spirit to her instead.

From what they had to work with, the ending is ok with how The Magician gets her just desserts (or just desert in this case), but it’s a terrible journey to get to such a point. The movie tried to make a simple plot complicated by making each scene convoluted, wasting so much time on setups that changed before any point can be made. The grandma died only so they can have her as a zombie by the end, so they can force a scorpion to come out of her mouth, so that there is still nothing obstructing the end result. Charlie already knew Egyptian and could have recited the words himself… but he didn’t. The magical chant doesn’t need anything special to happen, other than the possessed to face the next host.

We didn’t get a movie based on The Mummy. What we got was a failed attempt to revive The Exorcist, without using the name. In The Exorcist, you have an ancient Iraqi demon possessing a random girl in the US, a priest comes to exorcise the demon, he gets possessed, then he throws himself out the window to end the troubles. Here, we have another type of father take on the possession, to then transfer the demon to another person and continue the problem. Yes, The Magician gets what she deserves, but then what happens after that? Is Dalia now the new caretaker for this sarcophagus or maybe the American family? 

Also, what about the other people who were at the ritual? They were all forgotten because they didn't matter. The movie tries to make the situation bigger than it is, but then forgets that it’s meant to be a low budget horror story. The weirdest part about the copycat issue is that there is no “egyptian priest” to deal with this demon, and instead we have a random detective become the new expert, and only because she spoke English. People try to say this is good because it’s different, but it’s neither good nor different.

If I wanted to watch The Exorcist, I’d watch The Exorcist. If I want to watch a Mummy movie, I’m expecting a god damn mummy. I thought this was going to unlock a history of mummies across time that haunt some area like a zombie outbreak. I would have preferred a zombie style mummy, because that would fit closer to the slasher aspect of the first two renditions. Instead, we get magical possession that is selectively happening because the plot would break if it did anything sensible.

Granted, the plot was broken anyway, but you know what I mean.

Movies like this always trap themselves where it has to end in a stupid way or in a bleak and tragic sensible way. The other choice is to have the whole family die off and the curse spreads out as a demonic family unit. But they couldn’t end with that type of thing because they weren’t brave enough to make the family lose at the end. It’s a situation where the director wanted to have his nectarine and eat it too, thus we get the sappy ending that still doesn’t finish the thought. The curse is still around and going to continue, so it’s not really a happy ending.

If this came out as its own thing, like Oculus or Sinners, then I wouldn’t see this as so terrible, because it wouldn’t be trying to force itself into a series that it doesn’t belong in. This could have been a nice addition to the demonic possession genre, but it ended up being one of the worst Mummy movies ever released. But, even though this is worse than The Mummy’s Ghost and Tomb of the Dragon Emperor… it’s still not as bad as the Tom Cruise Mummy. Some moments in this movie are salvageable and there is an emotional impact when the parents are trying to keep a crumbling family barely functioning, with how Katie keeps trying to break out of her binds and acts like a coma patient at the same time. Even though the humor falls flat and every scene cuts itself off, at least it tries to be coherent and moves like a movie should.

You know the Tom Cruise Mummy done goofed when a movie that rejects everything about the property did a slightly better job than it did.

The good news is that there is no sequel announcement, despite the movie making its budget back and then some ($22M budget, $90M at the box office). The bad news is that Lee Cronin wants to make more of these movies and expand the universe, because he’s also been allowed to produce the following Evil Dead movies. He’s not going to direct them (thank god) but he’s still trying to make both IPs worse than ever before. The stupidest thing to realize is that now I can watch Evil Dead or The Mummy and get the same feeling for both. These are entirely different subjects that happen to both be horror, which should be clear to anyone with half a brain.

If anything, someone tried to mummify Lee Cronin and stopped at the brain removal part.


r/TDLH • • Jun 09 '26

Video Return to Castle Wolfenstein Analysis Part 17: Niflheim and World Ice Theory

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes

r/TDLH • • Jun 02 '26

Return to Castle Wolfenstein Analysis Part 16: The Secret Lair and Frankenstein

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes

r/TDLH • • May 31 '26

Review Review Alone Together #1: Beacon Patrol (2023) (An Infographic Review Series for solo games) (improved/updated graphic layout, with more icons/info + mobile-friendly)!

Post image
2 Upvotes

r/TDLH • • May 29 '26

Review Started an infographic review series for solo board games. Maybe a good idea for video games and novels, too? Here is #1: Beacon Patrol (2023)

Post image
2 Upvotes

r/TDLH • • May 20 '26

Discussion Pre-dev Log #3: Sharp Wings of an Angel (alt history Soviet Union submarine warfare-themed game) (free solo print & play) [Cover draft]

Post image
2 Upvotes

Here is the Board Game Geek blog. Heavily inspired by Under Falling Skies (2020) and The Hunt for Red October.


r/TDLH • • May 19 '26

Video Return to Castle Wolfenstein Analysis Part 14: Dieselpunk and Sci-fi Weapons

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes

r/TDLH • • May 15 '26

Review Beetlejuice Beetlejuice (2024) Review: I'd Rather Eat Sandworms

0 Upvotes

It’s hard to be creative, with many artists either accepting the change or striving to repeat the same peak of their career. Under postmodernism, we have had some of the most creative properties out there, especially for movies. Directors like Tim Burton come only every once in a while, despite the fact that his inspirations are all from things that came before him. German expressionism from the silent era, gothic styles of the Victorian era, silly B-movies of the cold war era. These relatable subjects combined in his head at some point, early on, to allow him to make such classics as Nightmare Before Christmas(1993) and Edward Scissorhands(1990).

Prior to this Disney and fairytale-style “peak” in his career, his first directorial debut was for Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure(1985), turning his name into a creative and zany relation to children’s entertainment. Before this, he worked on a featurette called Frankenwinnie for Disney, but the costs of this short film was so wasteful at over $1M(and considered inappropriate for kids), that the featurette was shelved and Tim was fired (later to be rehired as a writer for The Nightmare Before Christmas, but under their adult subsidiary, Touchstone Entertainment). His stop motion style was considered “unique” and what every studio wanted to capitalize on after the success of Pee-Wee, which featured his charming stop-motion animation style for multiple scenes. Studios wanted him in a time before CGI, due to his ability to create things that were both time consuming and few directors were specialized in. This leads us to his second directing project in 1988, known as Beetlejuice.

The existence of Beetlejuice is a strange one, because practically nothing begged for it to exist to begin with. Its production started while Tim was working on the script for his Batman(1989) film, and with the writers Michael McDowell and Larry Wilson, who he worked with during his directing of the Alfred Hitchcock Presents episode of The Jar. Fun fact: Ray Bradbury also worked on The Jar episode, but sadly he didn’t work on Beetlejuice. The intent behind the script was to make a horror classic, with the original script holding several things that were later changed, such as the opening deaths depicted more seriously and Beetlejuice seeking Lydia for a sex ritual. Beetlejuice as a character was also meant to be a winged demon that takes the form of a short man, which is funny to think how that’s basically what Violator from Spawn turned out to be. Also how we almost had Danny DeVito as Beetlejuice, instead of Michael Keaton.

Now, you might be wondering: why am I talking so much about the first movie when this is meant to be a review of the sequel AND why have my first review of the series BE the sequel?

That’s the best part about this sequel. If you saw the first movie, you saw the sequel, but a much better and far more coherent version of it. This “sequel” comes at us from a recent line of “legacyquels”, which will either wait a decade or 30 years to be made(can’t be 20 years for some reason). This movie came out 36 years after the original, meaning Tim Burton had 36 years to hone his craft and make a better movie, right? Well, the problem with Tim Burton is that he’s creative, like John Carpenter and Neill Blomkamp.

And no, that’s not a compliment.

As they move forward in time and get more famous, their creativity gets used in previous films, reducing their efficiency and increasing their laziness, due to how there’s only so much "uniqueness" one can have. I would say Tim Burton hit his peak in 2001 with Planet of the Apes, which is also where he stopped making original movies after Sleepy Hollow (1999). His problem is that he could only utilize German Expressionism so much until he recognizes it’s his only trick; and with the popularity of CGI, his claymation style was no longer useful, outside of a fully stop motion movie such as Corpse Bride (2005). Both of these are meant to be used for the Beetlejuice sequel, but delays in production after the first movie happened due to several stages of development hell. And you might be shocked as to why none of these sequels could be made previously.

The main issue was that Tim created such a silly aesthetic that he couldn’t find a writer who was able to make a script that he could find personally satisfying. Death was treated like a DMV, the idea of "foreign" in this German Expressionism world was calypso music, and most of the plot was actually about the dead couple played by Alec Baldwin and Geena Davis. Perhaps the concept of having 3 different key storylines (the dead couple, the Deetz family, and Beetlejuice himself) is why a sequel was deemed impossible. The 4 seasons of the cartoon weren't bad, necessarily, but they were equivalent to those Disney TV shows based on their animated films, where none of them would spark an actual adventure beyond movie parodies of other properties. Yes, Tim could have just written the sequel himself since he’s a great writer, but… he didn’t.

So what exactly was the script that finally broke this Hollywood curse?

Well…

The movie begins with Lydia Deetz hosting her TV show called Ghost House, which is appropriate since she’s technically the only ghost expert in this kind of world. Sure, the easily accessible handbook, that any human can pick up from any coffee table, should instantly make this world rampant with ghost believers… but this world holds more skeptics than anything. Due to her encounter with Beetlejuice over 36 years ago, Lydia thinks she has psychic powers, plagued by constant sightings of this ghost when she least expects it. These sightings cause her to take medication, have panic attacks, and she even becomes distant with her own daughter, Astrid (played by Jenna Ortega).

To be clear, Lydia doesn’t really need a daughter in this movie. In fact, the only reason they added Jenna to the mix is because she was working with Tim on a show called Wednesday as the titular character and the plot calls for a complete buffoon to get lost in the afterlife and marry Beetlejuice. Yes… again. I was thinking of saving that part of the plot until it pops up, but it doesn’t become a thing until the moment it happens. Now, from what little I’ve told you, you’re probably wondering what the plot actually is.

There is no real plot to this movie. There, I said it.

Yes, there are a million things happening at once, with recaps and new characters forcing their way in like a vacuum at an abortion clinic, but there is no true plot that we can speak of in this series of subplots. While Lydia is dealing with daughter issues, her stepmother, Delia (played by Catherine O’Hara), calls out of the blue to say Lydia’s stepfather, Charles (played by a claymation figure and stunt pants), was eaten by sharks on his way to go bird watching. This was a clever way to get rid of the elephant in the room, where they would have to do this OR recast the original actor, Jeffery Jones, due to the recent discovery that he was… not to be hired by anyone anymore for doing something that Hollywood is infamous for. I actually congratulate them for adding the missing piece with a plot point, but it literally goes nowhere, other than a sight gag where his lower half is seen entering the death waiting room.

Rather than having Charles be part of the plot, they use his death to make an excuse to show Delia hosting some kind of art gallery and also leave easter eggs of her statues in places like the local school where Astrid is farting about. Lydia goes to see her stepmother at the art gallery to hear about the funeral plans and to get a claymation scene with a plane and the ocean that is supposed to be comedic(sort of). Not only is this scene played out like a bad sitcom with Delia extending the cause of his death from plane crash to shark attack, but the concept was conceived by Tim Burton as his worst personal fear. That’s right, the director, known for his horror movies, has a lame fear that was forced into the movie because of it. I will give credit to say that using claymation to depict the gruesome death was charming, and that’s about the last time the movie shows any real sense.

I say this because 5 seconds later, as the scene is ending, someone falls into a manhole and dies in front of the two. This completely random person instantly goes through the death process(not how it works), which I assume was because he wasn’t attached to his house. After going through the waiting room and talking to the janitor(Danny DeVito), random boxes fall down in the distance, which happen to house the body parts of a soul stealer named Delores LaFerve (played by Monica Bellucci). That’s right, the world’s most dangerous ghost criminal was split into different parts, only to have these parts in several boxes RIGHT NEXT to each other. Her hipster quirk is that she staples herself together, resembling the concept of Sally from Nightmare Before Christmas, who was sewn together.

When she steals people’s souls and makes them crunch into themselves as a practical effect, you better enjoy that small treat, because that’s all she does for the whole movie.

The first movie had Beetlejuice as the villain, where he was a “bio-exorcist”, who got rid of people from houses, for ghosts who wanted to live in peace. The entire reason he became involved with Lydia was because he was supposed to scare away her and her family, which leads to a dinner scene involving shrimp hands and The Banana Boat Song, with that leading into a wedding ceremony. The wedding happened because the Deetz family wanted the house, while the Maitland couple (Adam and Barbara) originally owned the house, so Ortho used the *Handbook for the Recently Deceased* to cast a spell that would expel them into the death world forever. This means that the first movie is all about Beetlejuice being the villain, while the sequel has him as the target of a new villain. And I explain all of this to say that the plot is still practically the same thing, but worse.

And yes, Beetlejuice still wants to marry Lydia for absolutely no reason.

Ortho was a useful character as the secondary villain because he was a pawn of Beetlejuice, unknowingly to Ortho. In the sequel, the secondary villain is someone called Rory, who only exists to fill up the airtime, and his involvement is unknown to the audience. When I say he’s useless, I mean he’s absolutely useless. So far, I had no reason to mention him because he literally doesn’t do anything.  They forced a panic attack scene for Lydia(never happens again), all so Rory can introduce himself and give her pills while telling her she shouldn’t take them.

You know what makes it worse? He’s Lydia’s producer and ex-fiance who always follows her everywhere. And the only reason he follows her is because he wanted to profit on her psychic abilities that he doesn’t believe in (and are useless because everyone can see these ghosts anyway)… revealing this during the wedding, specifically so we don’t feel bad when he gets killed by the sandworm while standing next to Delores. Yes, I’m spoiling the ending in how Delores dies, but my explanation is as dedicated to the storytelling aspect as this movie is. But not even at my most snooty can I poorly deliver the pure garbage that happened at the funeral scene.

I want to tell it in order, since this back and forth is ridiculous. Right after Delores turns Danny DeVito into a lunchbox, we get tossed into a wake for Charles. More like a sleep since it’s so boring. Rory (already ex-fiance, might I add), pressures Lydia into marrying him for Halloween. At the same time, Astrid has a random guy called Jeremy invite her for the holidays (which I assume is more than Halloween). 

Both women act like their clams see more bodies than the netherworld’s waiting room, yet they’re also supreme loners who literally have no friends. And the only reason Astrid meets Jeremy is because she was angry at her mother for marrying Rory, to then bike away from the wake, to then crash into a fence for ABSOLUTELY NO REASON, to smash her head into a tree, to specifically NOT DIE. When she SMASHED HER HEAD INTO A TREE AT FULL SPEED, that’s when she meets the dead boy named Jeremy who wants to steal her living body, because there’s no reason to have her die at all from such a thing. They can’t have her die, because the plot needs her alive to have her get tricked into selling her soul to a random guy she just met in a treehouse. Yes, it’s convoluted and stupid, but this was the script Tim felt like it “worked”.

I guess it worked if you wanted this movie to die faster than half the old cast did, before it could be produced.

After the two love birds lazily get horny for the holidays, Beetlejuice appears… as a guy running a call center for… stuff. And all of the people working the call center are numerous jungle hunters who had their heads shrunk for… no reason. The joke in the first movie was that people were waiting in the waiting room for several years, long enough to have a hunter from the 1920s still there in the 80s. Another great joke that was ignored is how Miss Argentina was forced to be a receptionist because she took her own life. These small details were interesting worldbuilding and spoke for the scene.

The best they could do here was have people go “oh, cool, they have more than one shrunken head puppet.” The only thing it did for me was make me wonder if Tim Burton had his head shrunk during the making of this movie.

In enters Wolf Jackson (William Defoe), who has a way better plot than anything this movie could dish out, yet it’s completely ignored for him to simply exist in the background and do nothing the entire time. A detective in the netherworld with a comedically large penis trying to solve ghost crimes? Why wasn’t this the movie?! Oh well…

He tells Beetlejuice that Delores has escaped, and this causes Beetlejuice to explain his backstory with Delores… in Italian… during the black plague… in Italy. He’s not a New Yorker or anything, he’s actually from the 1300s, and there is a really strange reason why he is now Italian. Apparently, Tim Burton was heavily influenced by several Italian film makers, including Mario Brava (hinted in a photo where Lydia is pregnant) and Federico Fellini, mostly with the films Black Sunday (1960) and Federico’s dreamlike comedy approach. This black and white scene feels almost exactly like the opening of Black Sunday, which was a breath of fresh air, but also a terrible execution (pun intended) by having it forced to exist and forced to be in Italian. All that happens is that Delores tried to poison Beetlejuice on their wedding night because she was part of a death cult, but Beetlejuice was able to kill her with an axe before she completed the ritual.

I can enjoy the idea of a cool backstory for Beetlejuice, especially now that the wedding aspect makes more sense with it, but this is yet another aspect of too much happening for no reason. For example, why wasn’t Charles killed in a black and white scene too? Astrid and Jeremy didn’t have an Italian moment. Lydia and Rory didn’t have an Italian moment. Instead, we had claymation, then an Italian moment, then 70s soul train, then 60s baroque pop with MacArthur Park being sung at the wedding to lazily homage the diner scene of the first movie.

The parts of the original that we enjoyed are fully removed, while the plot points we didn't really care about are brought back from the dead to simply annoy the audience. 

Astrid believes she has psychic powers when she finds out Jeremy is a ghost, which is stupid because everyone could see ghosts in the previous film when a spirit holds more of a presence. Jeremy acts like this is the perfect time to explain that he can bring her to her dead father. Oh right, I forgot to mention this earlier: Astrid has a dead father. You know who else forgot to mention this earlier? The movie itself.
 
Through about half of the movie, I was under the impression that Rory was her father. It was discussed as if he was her father. Then Charles died in a shark accident while traveling. They wouldn’t be stupid enough to make this type of death for two fathers, would they? Oh, they are that stupid!

How fortunate for us that we’re treated with two fathers in the same family who both died from water creatures eating them alive. The only difference is that Charles died from a shark and Astrid’s father, Richard, died from piranhas in the Amazon when he was doing something involving climate change. It’s later revealed that he works in the afterlife as an immigration officer, meaning the “suicide rule” from the first movie is thrown out the window. What’s also thrown out the window is how important the school dance and Halloween are supposed to be, specifically because this is where we don’t get anything important. No Beetlejuice, no crashing the party, no school people getting scared of random stuff, and no dance from Jenna Ortega(despite her being famous for her weird dancing), until the short dance during the wedding.

Why have a teenager, in a teenage romance, on Halloween of all days, at the school if the school is never used?

Instead, what gets used is the same tired plot for two people in the same family: Astrid goes to the netherworld to see her father(to randomly find him) while Delia accidentally dies during a snake ritual to then go search for Charles. Why a snake ritual, you might ask? Well, she was attacked by a Beetlejuice snake in the first movie so…

Meanwhile, we find out Jeremy is actually a murderer who killed his parents and he died when he fell out of his treehouse while hiding from the police. He wants to steal Astrid’s life-force to return to the human world because…

Meanwhile, the police are searching for Beetlejuice, with Delores also looking for Beetlejuice, and Beetlejuice uses this as the perfect time to mess around with Lydia and Rory as their fake marriage counselor. Sure he’s running for his life, but of course he has to use a baby Beetlejuice joke twice and have nobody laugh at it. But he kicks the fake baby like a football, so that’s supposed to make someone laugh, right? And his right hand man, Bob, pretends to be Beetlejuice during an interrogation because he has a shrunken head.

GET IT?! Beetlejuice had his head shrunk in the first movie, but now it’s normal again! And Bob is the name of the right hand man of The Joker in The Batman, so it’s all a reference to something that’s not in the movie! Do you see why this sequel has nobody praising it yet?

To recalibrate what’s going on at this point: Lydia is looking for Astrid, while Astrid is looking for Richard, while Delia is looking for Charles, while Delores is looking for Beetlejuice, while Beetlejuice is looking for Lydia.

Thankfully, they all find each other at the train station, after seeing the soul train dance by, and Jeremy is stopped by Beetlejuice when Beetz pulls a lever and sends Jeremy to hell. An instant solution to a problem that shouldn't have existed in the first place. This subplot wasted like 15 mins for a movie that is 1 hour and 45 mins long, to surpass a previous movie that was 1 hour and 30 mins long. They could have simply NOT put this here, but then they would have felt that Jenna’s character is useless… because she is.

Returning home, the gang forgot they had a wedding to go to… that nobody wanted to have… except for Rory, who also didn't really want to have it. They all go to the wedding ceremony and this is where Delores finally catches up to Beetlejuice, because Beetlejuice crashed the wedding with Delia, to then have the ghost police show up to stop Beetlejuice, but Beetlejuice freezes them with his magic powers. Remember: NOTHING IS STOPPING HIM FROM USING THESE POWERS ON DELORES.

Beetlejuice then tries to find a reason for Lydia to give up on the marriage with Rory to then marry Beetlejuice instead, because he had a contract to marry her when he agreed to help Astrid get away from Jeremy. That thing that literally anyone else could have done from before? Yup, it caused the plot to repeat the first movie for no reason. So Beetlejuice uses a truth serum to cause Rory to admit that he was just using Lydia to make money and never cared about her, which was shocking to nobody. This is where Delores comes in to get eaten by a sandworm with Rory, and does absolutely nothing else.

You might be wondering: why does a sandworm appear at the wedding?

Well, Astrid read the handbook and saw a part where it says you can summon a sandworm with a door. Yup, that was it. That was all they could do with this and it was to repeat the first movie that resulted in Beetlejuice… not actually dying. Remember, he was sent back to the waiting room, which only took 36 years of waiting… sort of. And the worm didn’t need a door since Barbara was able to send one through the ceiling in the first movie without a portal so…

Let’s talk about the dance scene.

Nothing about this dance scene makes any sense. It comes out of nowhere, there is nobody to scare with it, and the only thing that stops it is the police appearing. Beetlejuice summons a band to play the music, everyone does a dance with it AS his wedding, and the ceremony is delayed because of it. The song has nothing to do with the music in the first movie, nothing to do with the Italian horror, it’s as random of a song as it can be. All of this to then have everyone get told by Astrid (again) that the contact was invalid because it was made when Beetlejuice illegally brought Lydia into the afterlife.

You might be thinking: wouldn’t that make Jeremy’s contract with Astrid invalid as well and totally pointless?

Yup…

Delia leaves with Charles to the great beyond, Astrid enjoys her time with her mother, and the final scene is where Lydia dreams of Astrid having a baby, to result in baby Beetlejuice coming out (this is the second time it’s used), leading to a double wake up cliche that fizzles away. Now, compare this to the first movie where the ending was triumphant and the ghosts of the house had a dance sequence with the ghost football players on the stairs. The one time we wanted them to copy the first movie and they… didn’t! And remember: THIS is the script that Tim felt was proper for a Beetlejuice sequel; which is a 3/10 script at best.

So… what the fuck happened?!

To reiterate what I said in the beginning: a creative person’s goal is to see what exists and move away from it. But to move away from it, you have to have something else that exists to move toward, causing creativity to be limited as time goes on, especially for the same individual. Tim has a million cliches as his staples (ironically where the stapled woman is played by the girl he’s dating at the time, making her a double cliche), but these are for little flavor bits that don’t matter. I would have preferred for this to be cliche, because at least then it would have been enjoyable for nostalgia’s sake. Instead, this was infuriatingly lazy, with several key characters serving zero purpose and several plots having nothing to do with anything.

I’m sure people would say the first movie had that too, and they would be painfully wrong. The ghost couple served as both the catalyst into the ghost world and for the Deetz family to act as the human villains. Then Beetlejuice comes in as the true villain, with Lydia splitting away from the family to find family in the ghost couple. The dinner scene served a purpose in which they used the musical number as an attempt to get rid of the Deetz family. The very ending with the wedding held a purpose because Lydia felt close enough to the Maitland couple that she would be willing to risk her life… and let’s get into THAT.

The first film used several characters to reinforce the theme of suicide, specifically the suicide rule for the receptionist and Lydia herself. Due to her isolation and her family neglecting her, Lydia wrote a suicide note and tried to jump off the roof, with Beetlejuice distracting her from the act long enough for the Maitland couple to later give her a loving talk about how death is not the solution. Their death was sudden and accidental, allowing them to see the trouble that death brings to what was a tranquil life. All of this was removed from the sequel and entire rules were changed, all because they weren’t allowed to get permission to have suicide as a theme again. And remember: the first movie depicted suicide as a BAD THING that is to be PUNISHED in the afterlife.

The most horrific thing about this is that Beetlejuice having a tropical island adventure in the rejected sequel would have made more sense, because then at least the movie would be weird in a good way. At least the shark and piranha deaths would have made sense. The whole character of Beetlejuice was to be spontaneous and gross when he is the villain, because we see him as a demonic presence that is all about chaos. It made sense for him to be a random scumbag New Yorker because that would be part of the theme when it comes to the bureaucratic system of the Netherworld and the relation to bugs. The spontaneity in the sequel is more like spontaneous human combustion, where all we can do is see its results as a tragedy.

In fact, the tropical theme fits so well with the gothic atmosphere that I have to address such an elephant in the room (as if there aren’t enough of these). People will defend this movie and claim that the tropical aspect was totally out of left field, but I would say the dead football players were (pun intended). Having a witch doctor shrinking heads, to move to calypso music, to move to Saturn’s moon full of sandworms all make sense as themes relating to death. Calypso was the Greek nymph who detained Odysseus for 7 years, with the music actually coming from the word “kaiso”, meaning to “continue”, both relating to the idea of being trapped as a ghost in your own home. Saturn is named after the Roman god of time and liberation, which relates him to the sands of time, which relates him to the “worm” that comes from wurm, which is a Germanic dragon of chaos.

The more we look at the randomness of the first movie, the more we see they all tie back to the main theme. The sequel didn’t have any of this!

But… it made money. Even with a crazy budget of $100M, it made $452M, allowing it to claim success. Sadly, it was more successful in the box office than the original, which will only further its validation among the modern day consumer zombies.

The money didn’t come from its own merit. The year of 2024 had nothing to offer, with people expecting this sequel to shine from the cast lineup and the wait time. I would even say that the little gags strewn about were able to distract most people from the plot being ridiculous, because let’s face it… the movie was granted jester’s privilege, where people don’t question how stupid something is when it’s already titled as foolish. Any quirk or conundrum is going to be labeled as another joke that people like me “just don’t get.” But the problem is that I get it and I don’t like it, because it’s a bad movie.

And might I add that the Fanta soda that was used to promote this utter trash, the haunted cinnamon apple, tasted like cockroach sweat was squeezed through a jizz sock. When I tried it, I thought “wow, nothing could leave a worse taste in my mouth than this” and I was proven wrong after watching the movie. But I expected to be disappointed since I saw Wednesday and I already saw Tim Burton in a downward spiral for the last 20 years. The idea of a legacyquel is also terrible for every actor involved. Even if Michael Keaton can croak out the Beetlejuice voice at 74, people like Catherine O’Hara (who died 2 years after filming) were only there to force every scene into long bouts of sitting down and talking.

And trust me, I have nothing against Winona Ryder and her delicious honkers, but she didn’t do anything in this movie to make herself needed. The entire point of the movie was to have Beetlejuice haunt the only psychic in town (with her psychic powers useless and never proven), want to marry her, and somehow her life is still in shambles after it was meant to be fixed at the end of the first movie. To make it worse, their attempt to add more characters had the new cast be even more useless. Lydia was to be Beetlejuice’s bride and Beetlejuice was already married to Delores. 

Ok… why not have Delores fight for Beetlejuice’s love while Lydia deals with their zany relationship issues and the plot is her dealing with other people’s problems? Jenna didn’t need to be Lydia’s daughter, especially since she already looks like one of the shrunken head hunters. So many possibilities with the cast at hand, and they picked the worst decision for each one. If anything, they only made this movie so they can kill off the parents, pretend The Maitlands never existed, and open the door to a new movie where Astrid is the next protagonist. You know, the person that Beetlejuice was ignoring the entire time.

As much as I hate the idea of it, I feel they’ll make a third movie and call it Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice. I hope by then, he’s gone and so is this ruined franchise. The theme of the first film was how death brings more trouble, but I would say bringing things back from the dead is where the trouble starts. This zombie of a sequel didn’t bring much to the table, other than my appreciation for the original. Daylight come and me want to go watch that instead.


r/TDLH • • May 11 '26

Video Return to Castle Wolfenstein Analysis Part 13: Lend Lease and Hephaestus

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes

r/TDLH • • May 06 '26

Discussion Early Prototyping #12 -- finally entered the prototyping phase. Polishing everything + playtesting soon. The game is smaller, tighter, more coherent, and features a nice deckbuilding + deck construction hybrid system, in addition to a Slay the Spire-like Roguelike progression + Campfire system!

Thumbnail
gallery
2 Upvotes

r/TDLH • • May 04 '26

Video Return to Castle Wolfenstein Analysis Part 12: The Airfield Secret Weapons of WW2

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes