r/WikiLeaks • u/JamesParkes • 16d ago
News Democratic Party runs more than 60 military-intelligence candidates for Congress
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2026/10/01/xwnl-o01.html4
u/CapCityMatt 15d ago
Knowledge is the only threat to tyranny, start mastering Constitutional law if you want to know how to control the public servants.
4
7
16d ago
[deleted]
2
u/EggsInaTubeSock 13d ago
Critical thinking skills are important for this "post."
The headline and title of military intelligence misrepresents this entire thing. Its used so loosely to make up a story from the data.
1
u/FriendsWasNice 13d ago
I agree, but it's good advertising to highlight what the parties go looking for when they want to bring someone up the ladder. They say they're looking for talent, but really what they want is obedience. Thomas Massie comes to mind as a casualty for non-obedience. I hope AIPAC gets banned world-wide.
1
u/EggsInaTubeSock 13d ago
You could say the same thing of “they have college degrees” to now draw a Venn diagram around certain colleges?
The number of serious candidates is even a low number. I don’t see anything here other than a correlation between holding a state related job before pushing for an elected position.
And that’s pretty damn logical to me.
1
0
u/EggsInaTubeSock 13d ago
This is catastophized and making up a story from nothing. Gross
There aren't 60+ military intelligence personnel.
The article itself explains there are 60+ people somehow related to national security. That group includes combat veterans, pilots, military police, career enlisted soldiers, medical personnel, and State Department staff.
Some are just soldiers. Some were medical only.
And the article itself says none were CIA.
1
19
u/5553331117 16d ago
We are fucked no matter the party.
Such is the state of 2 party political system.