r/comics • Bummer Party • 18d ago

OC Some of my recent New Yorker rejects [OC]

39.7k Upvotes

527 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.8k

u/Casual_Deviant Bummer Party 18d ago

Thanks! They get hundreds/thousands of submissions a week, so it's not too surprising. Sold my first one a few months ago and fingers crossed a second sale comes soon!

336

u/AsstBalrog 18d ago

Kudos -- what is TNY paying per toon these days?

531

u/Casual_Deviant Bummer Party 18d ago

Thanks! It’s not always perfectly up to date, but I generally use this as my guide for what the various markets pay: https://colemantoons.com/marketlist.php

496

u/seetons 18d ago

Am I really led to believe here that the WSJ pays only $170 for a cartoon and they need to be sent to a gmail address?

254

u/Casual_Deviant Bummer Party 18d ago

Correct!

45

u/dividezero 18d ago

It's been decades but I don't remember cartoons in the WSJ, just those engraved style line drawings. Maybe it's that. But still. You'd be surprised how the sausage is made in every industry. A gmail address is kinda sophisticated for the shit I've seen. So much of the world is dependant on a laptop that's been on since Obama was president and everyone forgot about it under a bunch of files somewhere in a back room.

Shit, I had to talk my team out of moving a server to an raspberry pi and stick it somewhere. I had to explain all the ways that's stupid in detail before they have up on the idea. And the bill really isn't that much anyway so I'm not sure what they were trying to solve.

And the number of times entire departments were held together with literal duct tape. I've worked for some big places and seen some shit man

152

u/Continental__Drifter 18d ago

It's the WSJ.
They're a fucking joke.
I'm surprised it isn't yahoo address.

12

u/jewrassic_park-1940 18d ago

Come on man why the drive-by

26

u/cortesoft 18d ago

Why would they pay more than that when paying $170 gets them thousands of submissions a week, with good enough quality that they are rejecting ones as good as the ones in this post? I don’t think the quality would go up much if they paid more.

17

u/purplepluppy 18d ago

Well that's the WSJ not New Yorker.

9

u/TheSorceIsFrong 18d ago

Pickleball Magazine pays 150 lol

8

u/turikk 18d ago

Am I really led to believe here that the WSJ pays only $170 for a cartoon and they need to be sent to a gmail address?

this is a 3rd party site collecting various submission methods and many are dead links. i trust /u/Casual_Deviant but i'd take this with a grain of salt, there is probably a better way to do it.

34

u/Casual_Deviant Bummer Party 18d ago

I have sold cartoons to the WSJ — I can confirm it’s the correct email address!

10

u/turikk 18d ago

i wonder if this is a secret back channel to the editor of that column. i might have to ask my family member who worked at WSJ 😂

20

u/Casual_Deviant Bummer Party 18d ago

WSJ actually contracts out their cartoons to a syndication company, so you’re emailing a small business vs. anyone at the actual newspaper.

63

u/AsstBalrog 18d ago

Thanks. Planet Nude Newsletter is cheap AF, but bragging rights I suppose.

73

u/Stalking_Goat 18d ago

You publish in that one mostly for the…

Exposure.

21

u/AsstBalrog 18d ago

Lemme finish my coffee before you people start in with it

7

u/huitlacoche 18d ago

that was your coffee? sorry

29

u/OrienasJura 18d ago

Someone please teach my man some basic CSS.

EDIT: The header image is nested inside a paragraph this is amazing

55

u/mainman879 18d ago

It's a simple site that does exactly what it needs to and nothing else. It's old perfection. A lost art really.

39

u/chimpfunkz 18d ago

That's an HTML website that he built himself in a week. It works exactly as it needs to, and requires zero upkeep other than content. He pays $0 for web development to accomplish 100% of the goals.

1

u/DogOwner12345 18d ago

It makes my screen black when I click it imao.

22

u/i-dont-speel-no-good 18d ago

NEEDS MORE ADS, COOKIE ALERTS, AND EMBEDDED AUTO PLAYING VIDEOS!

13

u/Banjo-Elritze Nazi Liquifier 18d ago

How about no?

3

u/SadMasterpiece7019 18d ago

Someone please teach my man some basic CSS.

YES. Also some client-side scripting and ad trackers. This isn't the 90s anymore.

0

u/SophiaofPrussia 18d ago

The “Progressive Dairyman” has to be a joke, right? They seem to have forgotten that women exist and they only pay $10 for a cartoon? Not exactly what I’d call progressive…

28

u/AmericanScream 18d ago

Do they ever give you any useful feedback as to why they were rejected?

It makes me wonder, whether it might be prudent to try and re-submit the same cartoon later in time? Some of those are really, really good and I can't imagine the New Yorker not using them.

46

u/Casual_Deviant Bummer Party 18d ago

People do often submit the same toon a few times! I’ve done it from time to time with some that I think are especially good, but usually I just shop them around to other markets and end up posting them on social media.

9

u/debasic 18d ago

It's probably just a handful of people deciding on these

33

u/Casual_Deviant Bummer Party 18d ago

It’s primarily the Cartoon Editor!

6

u/LainieCat 18d ago

Best job ecer

5

u/stefan_stuetze 18d ago

They all made me nod with respect apart from the cavemen in hell one, that made me laugh out loud.

1

u/Prysorra2 18d ago

Loving the vague Don Hertzfeldt vibe

0

u/No-Lunch4249 16d ago

Ah, you see, these are too comprehensible and funny for the newyorker