r/finance • • Sep 05 '26

The Reinvention of Apollo Is Bigger Than Its Scandals

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-09-04/how-leon-black-built-and-reinvented-apollo-money-to-burn-review?accessToken=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzb3VyY2UiOiJTdWJzY3JpYmVyR2lmdGVkQXJ0aWNsZSIsImlhdCI6MTc4ODU5OTU1NSwiZXhwIjoxNzg5MjA0MzU1LCJhcnRpY2xlSWQiOiJUS1VITzBSS1YyVVIwMCIsImJjb25uZWN0SWQiOiJEMzU0MUJFQjhBQUY0QkUwQkFBOUQzNkI3QjlCRjI4OCJ9.ge9HftwAJ167xjZOlsH5xDi6mu1G8BpRdeFEgdQ4bnk

William Cohan chronicles the private equity giant’s colorful past. But its push into the savings of the upper middle class makes its future more consequential.

138 Upvotes

32 comments sorted by

27

u/bloomberg Sep 05 '26

Gary Sernovitz for Bloomberg News

Like eating a tub of candy for dinner, reading the nearly 700 pages of William Cohan’s Money to Burn: The Unvarnished Truth About Leon Black, Apollo, and the New Wall Street (Portfolio, Sept. 8) leaves you fatigued, stuffed and still hungry. Yet some of the book’s most satisfying insights come in its final eight pages, when an “Apollo competitor” describes the firm, usually thought of as a pugnacious private capital giant, as “a lightly regulated and leveraged bank.”

The numbers supporting the competitor’s case are telling. Only a sixth of Apollo Global Management Inc.’s almost 6,000 people are now investment professionals. Many of the rest sell annuities through its Athene business. Their customers, self-selected for financial caution, provide Athene with low-cost funding; Apollo then uses their money to make direct loans through 16 separate platforms. While the firm isn’t as snoozy as the old 3-6-3 model — take in money at 3%, lend it out at 6%, leave the office at 3 o’clock — it does bear the risks of that model. Apollo, the competitor points out, is contracted to pay its annuity holders, unlike private equity or credit firms that — caveat emptor — merely try their best to meet targeted returns.

The money tells the same story. In the first half of this year, Apollo earned $1.5 billion from the “spread” at Athene, the difference between what it makes from its loans and what it needs to pay out in annuities. That’s the same amount it made from asset management, where three-quarters of revenue came from private capital funds rather than private equity. Indeed, banklike Apollo now makes about the same from syndicating loans as from managing private equity funds. Only 0.8% of its corporate revenue came from carried interest and other performance-related incentive fees.

This is a big-bet transformation. But Money to Burn doesn’t seem particularly interested in exploring the questions it raises. Why is Apollo steadily diversifying away from the competitive, investor-sated business of delivering 15% returns in PE for the lower-margin business of delivering 5% returns to annuity buyers? Is it because Apollo’s PE performance, from its 2006 flagship fund on, has been all over the place? Does Apollo’s evolved approach seem savvy only because its credit underwriting (and annuity-holder behavior) hasn’t yet been tested in a crisis? And how did hard-edged personality-driven Apollo up here?

🎁 Gift Link: Read the full review here.

17

u/howtoreadspaghetti Sep 05 '26

Someone at Apollo finally learned that life insurance carriers are the biggest asset managers in the world with trillions of AUM. So Athene is the way they get into the field. 

19

u/das_war_ein_Befehl Sep 05 '26

They kinda didn’t have a choice. They got too big for their strategy

LBO as a strategy worked when there were lots of asset rich companies that got fat before the 80s due to how new deal era policies worked. Those are basically gone as PE stripped them all for parts.

Thats why you see shit like them trying to roll up HVAC shops and other weird bullshit. They’re more in the business of financial games than turnarounds (but every PE shop will claim otherwise).

3

u/howtoreadspaghetti Sep 05 '26

I don't blame them for changing strategy instead of thinking they can hyperoptimize a space that they've grown too big in. Going into insurance doesn't solve much since it's a highly regulated industry but it does solve the issue of finding revenue streams elsewhere. Premium paying policyholders solve a lot of their concerns. 

1

u/IsopodAdmirable5597 14d ago

fair point on regulation, but the premium holders still depend on Apollo’s loan quality. if the credit spreads widen or defaults spike, the cash that backs those annuities can shrink, putting the policyholders in the seat knowing the bank‑like model is as risky as a private‑credit juggernaut

1

u/howtoreadspaghetti 14d ago

I don't worry about Apollo getting subpar loan quality terms. They're large enough to not get themselves into financially precarious arrangements. 

1

u/East-Priority5199 4d ago

sure, lbo primes are basically dusting now, but annuities give apollo a steady stream of capital that turns into a quasi-bank spread—it’s not magic, it’s just cheaper debt that still requires good underwriting

8

u/secretfinaccount Sep 05 '26

Lightly regulated and leveraged, sure, but isn’t a defining feature of a “bank” taking deposits and being liable to return those deposits today. I guess this story can be more accurate but just as interesting if it drops the b word.

2

u/Subordinated_Note Sep 06 '26

So a life insurance company and an asset manager, regulated as such. Literally not a depository institution.

40

u/Practical-Mobile6508 Sep 05 '26

Does the CEO still rape kids or was that just a Leon Black problem?

11

u/MiddleAgedSponger Sep 05 '26

Leon resigned as CEO when his payments to prolific sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein became public. He has given a a lot of his shares to his children.

10

u/Practical-Mobile6508 Sep 05 '26

You didn't answer my question

2

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '26

[deleted]

5

u/Practical-Mobile6508 Sep 05 '26

So the jury's still out on if the current CEO rapes kids, got it!

1

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '26

[deleted]

3

u/Practical-Mobile6508 Sep 05 '26

Yeah go for it dude

1

u/HR_Paul Sep 06 '26

Judging from the propaganda headline and article there can't be any reason to have any suspicion of these career criminals. All upstanding citizens now. Edit: the very picture of legitimate businesscrooks.

3

u/McKoijion Sep 06 '26

It’s abundantly clear that Apollo, Jeffrey Epstein, and Israel are the greatest enemies of the American people. There’s a massive backlash coming not just from every other country abandoning the petrodollar, but from within the US itself.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Traditional-Use-4093 14d ago

Apollo's pivot from a pure private-equity firebrand to an annuity-driven, loan-syndicating juggernaut means its money isn’t coming from a few LPs anymore – it’s coming from the whole upper-middle-class saving pool. The real test will be how that leveraged bank-like model holds up when the credit market turns; if those loans go sour, everyday savers could feel the bite. The book scratches the surface of this shift, but the consequences for everyday savers are what make it bigger than the scandals.

1

u/Stunning-Most-6515 14d ago

Looks like Apollo’s pivot is really just an asset‑manager‑switch with a street‑style balance sheet. the annuity base gives it a low‑cost deposit‑like funding, but that also means a higher leverage hit to those savers if credit turns sour. i’m curious how they’ll guard against a crisis that knocks the annuity market hard.

1

u/NoBodybuilder1496 13d ago

apollo’s big‑move into Athene and the loan spread is really a shift in risk,

not a cure for the past. the annuity holders are the new ‘deposit base’ and the loans

carry the credit exposure—if rates climb or defaults spike the spread will narrow and

the safety cushion shrinks, just like a bank mood‑lighting a liquidity fight. so while

the narrative is about a cleaner, lower‑margin model, the underlying balance sheet

still has the same core perils a bank faces. keep an eye on that curve.

1

u/No_Design_1619 5d ago

so the big change isn’t about chasing higher PE returns, it’s about feeding its own loan book with a steady stream of fed‑fund‑style capital from everyday savers. the upside is a lower‑margin model that doesn’t rely on a few mega LPs, but the downside is more people who will see a hit in their retirement accounts if Apollo’s underwriting goes sideways. it’s like a bank that tells you, "we’re safe, just remember the interest rate is fixed at 5%."

-2

u/NS031716 Sep 05 '26

In many ways the economy hasn’t changed since 2009. Glut of savings are still the biggest problem and the more we shirk from this problem the more we are going to pay for it in the future.