“Inside the Foids angry retreat”

Logically, the next thing someone does after having an abortion is try not to feel bad about it.

But they dislike people calling it murder (which it is) because it makes them look and feel bad, and women hate feeling bad.

I swear, people think men are idiots. They think that the proselytization is supposed to get that deep into us. "Oh, men are delaying starting families. Men are living with their parents and taking longer to move out. Men are not hard launching into their careers. Men are a bunch of sissies these days." Yeah, but also a lot of men are taking back their own social sovereignty in society and learning to realize their own worth. This is, I think, the part that makes society uncomfortable.

Meanwhile, nothing can be expected out of women. Nothing. You can't tell them not to sleep around with a bunch of men, because that's an attack on their sexual autonomy. You can't tell them that you don't want a hardcore career girl boss, or else you're attacking their ambitions. You can't tell them to actually have better hobbies other than just scrolling on social media and watching Netflix. That's an attack apparently also on their well-being, according to some of them. Go figure. Nothing can be demanded out of a woman. But the worst part, society actually works hard to make sure women never have to grow up to be proper citizens in society. The same is not true for men.

Men are thrown the curveball about every fucking little thing. And it makes sense. We as men are expected to carry the burdens of society because we are the ones that shape society for the most part. But that being said, I find it funny that society is manipulating the social contract of male sacrifice and thinking men just sacrifice for a society that doesn't serve its role to recognize men's importance. It's funny to me, like feminists and the normies really think us men are idiots, huh? That we're just supposed to bend down for the establishment.

It seems like the logical question to ask if women do not owe men affection, respect, or recognition for their efforts, then why do they do men owe society, their entire chivalry, against their will? That's why I find the moral panic of men checking out from society hilariously perfomative.

If a 35-year old man chooses to go for a 20-year old woman, it is predatory, according to the soys because he is taking advantage of her but somehow a woman in her mid-30s who has already had her fun who chooses a shy nerdy inexperienced young man is not predatory? Make it make sense.

"Oh, I just like nerdy men" - ok, show me the list of "nerdy" men that you used to date, and we are not talking about pretty boys wearing glasses, we are talking actual nerds.

"Oh, but people mature and change their preferences" - it's very comfortable that once you hit the wall, suddenly your preferences start including inexperienced shy nerdy men who don't have options and are going to worship you because they haven't had any experiences with younger women.

Almost any complaints that women have about men are pure projections and the equivalent acts that they commit are not criticized because "you just have to have nuance, bro".

EDIT:

Apparently, some people don't have reading comprehension and assume that I think that "power imbalance" relationships should be shamed. That's not what my position is. I find the whole concept of power imbalance ridiculous, it cannot be precisely defined and I don't think age gap or experience-gapped relationships shouldn't exist. This is more of a "if you believe this, not to be a hypocrite, you should also accept this too" kind of a post.

Honeypot of greed

Society tells men to have a ''personality'', to treat women with chivalrous respeck meanwhile attractive men like this one are slaying with 20 IQ text prompts. Theres a systematic effort to hide this reality from men

it’s refreshing hearing a woman calling out other women for this behavior, taking 0 accountability in the men they choose to get pregnant by and then air out all their dirty laundry on the timeline just cause they got left by him, but they would keep staying in abusive relationships otherwise (unless he was literally trapping her but that’s obviously not the case for these girls)

She also calls out MONKEY BRANCHING and HOEFLATION. I’ve never heard someone clamp down on this mentality that men are disposable and replaceable before. And women who think they have infinity options, she lays out the following traits in people who to be weeded out:

- people who are only interested in hooking up

- mentally ill and abusive people (which is majority, including women)

- say you land a date, will be even like you back?

- guy that can even tolerate your insufferable radical feminist beliefs

Quantity is NOT quality!

If you have a good man, one that is willing to marry you, risk his life for you, pour his assets into you, he is taking on a huge risk so cherish him and hold onto that man. The concept of two decent people liking each other and then getting together is more rare than society makes it out to be.

”If you keep playing Russian Roullette, you’re gonna get what’s coming to you”.
“Are you willing to go through the Cassie treatment for that Diddy money?”

Two crucial lessons. you get what you put up with and the grass is not always greener on the other side.

Small point, but I think it is important to remember that looks didn’t use to be THIS important. Obviously in caveman times when survival is a significant concern, women are going to seriously balance that and may not be as focused on looks. Heck, you could argue with those pressures guys may be less picky too compared to now. The current situation hasn’t even been around 100 years. This is a changed environment due to women being economically independent and society, despite being able to shame, having less weight to FORCE coupling.

More men are opting to NOT be betabuxx in part because it is not a matter of survival and they have a teaspoon of self-respect. Looks have always been important, but I think it’s important to remember the current situation in developed countries is unprecedented. This is not necessarily a “natural state” because this environment is new and people are at least a bit malleable behavior wise.

I see a lot more single, never married men with no kids. It's not considered very weird anymore like it did in the '90s

Of course, correlation doesn't necessarily mean causation and maybe in some cases it really is just a side effect. But how many people, especially men, nowadays think they are depressed due to work, their financial situation, etc, but the real reason is they are either a) chronically single with either no or very occasional sex, b) trapped in a dead bedroom relationship, or c) in a relationship they've settled for, whether they know it or not, and the real reason the antidepressants are helping them are because they're not thinking of their imadequate situation as much? It's certainly a possibility, though I suspect few people would study it both because it's politically incorrect suggesting society at large is to blame for men's problems, and b) could impact the profitability of Big Pharma. But it's a hypothesis worth considering at least

pick one from each part:

1. incelslop, right wing dog whistle

2. skill issue

3. stop whining, improve yourself

4. incel

assembly into an example:

It's incelslop/right wing dog whistle. Skill issue bro. Stop whining and improve yourself. Incel.

____________________

If you've been serfing reddit enough I'm sure you are familiar with these.