r/lovethissmug • u/callmedale • 10d ago
🦌 Animals 🐇 Posts that go into Lagomorph taxonomy
I mainly remember it from tumblr, where unrelated posts will occasionally just diverge into a phylogenetic comparison of various rabbits, hares, and bunnies. There’s even a few posts with comics people drew. But even just in its simplest form like these, I just like when the main point of a post is comparing and explaining the differences between these long eared rodents.
104
u/jonyssaur-Br-7980 10d ago
49
5
64
u/Top_Sky_120 10d ago
why you should join lagamorpha? we have:
bnnuy :)
smol bnnuy :)
I STARED AT THE ABYSS. AND IT AVERTED ITS GAZE
literally just pikachu
The Wabbit
55
u/Top_Sky_120 10d ago
30
4
52
u/the_marxman 10d ago
8
u/1dankboi 10d ago
I’ll have you know that I was expecting to see this cat here because I was about to post it myself.
44
30
u/SettTheCephelopod 10d ago
It's funny how rabbit and bunny just, are two names for the exact same species.
I've googled it, and learned there is no difference at all, they're the same animal.
But HARE does refer to a different animal.
17
u/callmedale 10d ago
Rabbit sometimes has a different connotation like a wild one vs bunny for a tame one but it can also just come down to preference
5
25
u/Totally-a_Human 10d ago
Lagomorphs are not rodents, but their closest relatives ☝️🤓
19
u/WranglerFuzzy 10d ago
So, for the record, a break down of Small round friends:
Bunny, pika: lagomorph
Chinchilla, guinea pig: rodent
Wombat: marsupial
Hyrax: a fuckin’ pacyderm.
15
u/Hanede 10d ago
As funny as it sounds, hyraxes are not pachyderms. They are close relatives of elephants yes, but not the same thing.
7
u/TimeStorm113 10d ago
Though that’s mainly just because „pachyderm“ is an invalid classification nowadays because of it being polyphyletic
2
2
u/Gaylaeonerd 9d ago
Yeah pachyderm is usually used colloquially for elephants specifically, but it's actual definition includes elephants, rhinos, and hippos, which are all very much not closely related, so its not a valid term at all
0
63
u/geosunsetmoth 10d ago
18
u/StructureMage 10d ago
nah watership down had hrududu adams was on the same shit
8
u/VstarFr0st263364 10d ago
I thought that watership down was specifically famous for its lack of human terminology altogether. Like warriors still felt like they were speaking English, but WD was a lot more like its own language
13
u/ionlytoptops 10d ago
crickets and hares both have the same crazy long legs and also the same face, like the only mammal that reminds me more of an insect
7
10
5
2
u/Petrichor0110_Alt Merkava Enthusiast 10d ago
Image 2 looks like it came right from r/nonpoliticaltwitter
0
u/ScorpionTheSandwing 9d ago
Hares are technically a type of rabbit
4
u/Gaylaeonerd 9d ago
Depends how you look at it
If you'd say a fox was a dog, then yes. If you wouldn't, then no
4
u/ScorpionTheSandwing 9d ago
3
u/Gaylaeonerd 9d ago
Dog and fox are both canids, in different genera
Rabbit and hare are both leporids, in different genera
They both clade together within the same family but in different genera, so they are the same technically but traditionally treated as separate










230
u/Canvase_San 10d ago
Ive got a few of these