r/lovethissmug • • 10d ago

🦌 Animals 🐇 Posts that go into Lagomorph taxonomy

I mainly remember it from tumblr, where unrelated posts will occasionally just diverge into a phylogenetic comparison of various rabbits, hares, and bunnies. There’s even a few posts with comics people drew. But even just in its simplest form like these, I just like when the main point of a post is comparing and explaining the differences between these long eared rodents.

1.5k Upvotes

43 comments sorted by

230

u/Canvase_San 10d ago

Ive got a few of these

112

u/Canvase_San 10d ago

9

u/MintyBarrettM95 [Enby?] DM Me Art of Robots & Mechas! 10d ago

reminds me of when i had a brasilian friend who, with me, referred to strawberries in eng as "strawp"

86

u/Canvase_San 10d ago

Not quite the same but I think the idea is still there

21

u/Short-Being-4109 10d ago

*the idea is still hare

104

u/jonyssaur-Br-7980 10d ago

49

u/Darkest_Settler 10d ago

The words "minimizes" and "maximizes" are swapped.

6

u/jonyssaur-Br-7980 10d ago

i din't make the image

5

u/Antique_Amphibian107 10d ago

BUT HER LEGS WERE TOOOOOO LONG

64

u/Top_Sky_120 10d ago

why you should join lagamorpha? we have:

bnnuy :)

smol bnnuy :)

I STARED AT THE ABYSS. AND IT AVERTED ITS GAZE

literally just pikachu

The Wabbit

55

u/Top_Sky_120 10d ago

meet the pika

Give it a long tail, make it yellow. Voilla! Pikachu.

30

u/springrex1422 10d ago

Now THAT is john mammal

5

u/Belos147 10d ago

No that's the moonrat.

1

u/Viggo8000 9d ago

No you are

4

u/Fenrir_Carbon 10d ago

Gen 1 chubby Pikachu

52

u/the_marxman 10d ago

8

u/1dankboi 10d ago

I’ll have you know that I was expecting to see this cat here because I was about to post it myself.

44

u/Naive_Jacket718 10d ago

the first image is giving

30

u/SettTheCephelopod 10d ago

It's funny how rabbit and bunny just, are two names for the exact same species.

I've googled it, and learned there is no difference at all, they're the same animal.

But HARE does refer to a different animal.

17

u/callmedale 10d ago

Rabbit sometimes has a different connotation like a wild one vs bunny for a tame one but it can also just come down to preference

5

u/Belos147 10d ago

It's why common names arent particularly useful in science.

25

u/Totally-a_Human 10d ago

Lagomorphs are not rodents, but their closest relatives ☝️🤓

19

u/WranglerFuzzy 10d ago

So, for the record, a break down of Small round friends:

Bunny, pika: lagomorph

Chinchilla, guinea pig: rodent

Wombat: marsupial

Hyrax: a fuckin’ pacyderm.

​
https://giphy.com/gifs/exNiHTfXz1L1xjopEl

15

u/Hanede 10d ago

As funny as it sounds, hyraxes are not pachyderms. They are close relatives of elephants yes, but not the same thing.

7

u/TimeStorm113 10d ago

Though that’s mainly just because „pachyderm“ is an invalid classification nowadays because of it being polyphyletic 

3

u/Accurate_Mongoose_20 10d ago

They are in Afrotheria and are in their own group and family, it being (group)Hyracoidea and (family)Provaciidae

2

u/lolopiro 10d ago

what do they mean polys arent valid? love is love!

2

u/Gaylaeonerd 9d ago

Yeah pachyderm is usually used colloquially for elephants specifically, but it's actual definition includes elephants, rhinos, and hippos, which are all very much not closely related, so its not a valid term at all

0

u/WranglerFuzzy 10d ago

(Technically correct, Exaggerating for comedic effect.)

63

u/geosunsetmoth 10d ago

Related

18

u/StructureMage 10d ago

nah watership down had hrududu adams was on the same shit

8

u/VstarFr0st263364 10d ago

I thought that watership down was specifically famous for its lack of human terminology altogether. Like warriors still felt like they were speaking English, but WD was a lot more like its own language

13

u/ionlytoptops 10d ago

crickets and hares both have the same crazy long legs and also the same face, like the only mammal that reminds me more of an insect

7

u/Ruvis_Norako 10d ago

Some bats look like moths. Some are even pollinators.

5

u/dinglebellsdingus 10d ago

Zero taxonomy present in your examples however ☹️

2

u/Petrichor0110_Alt Merkava Enthusiast 10d ago

Image 2 looks like it came right from r/nonpoliticaltwitter

0

u/ScorpionTheSandwing 9d ago

Hares are technically a type of rabbit

4

u/Gaylaeonerd 9d ago

Depends how you look at it

If you'd say a fox was a dog, then yes. If you wouldn't, then no

4

u/ScorpionTheSandwing 9d ago

It’s not the same, yeah foxes are canines, which is “the dog family” but a fox and a domestic dog are in different clades. There is no way to make a clade of rabbits that excludes hares.

3

u/Gaylaeonerd 9d ago

Dog and fox are both canids, in different genera

Rabbit and hare are both leporids, in different genera

They both clade together within the same family but in different genera, so they are the same technically but traditionally treated as separate