Ćlodie Thomas told her husband she was on her way home.
That message should have been followed by a door opening, a mother returning to her child, another working day over.
Instead, the 27-year-old mother was critically injured by a police bullet while travelling home from work at Camp-Levieux on 9 October.
As a Mauritian citizen, I am angry. But I want to make my position clear I do not support violence, destroying other peopleās belongings, damaging businesses or public property, or actions that force schools to close and disrupt childrenās education. Workers, families and students should not suffer further.
But I understand the frustration behind this unrest. Opposing destruction does not mean staying silent about failures or accepting endless requests for calm and trust.
According to the driverās testimony reported by LāExpress, the sergeant opened his door, pointed a gun at his head and threatened him. The driver says he drove away in fear before a shot passed through the rear window and struck Ćlodie. These allegations require a thorough, independent investigation.
The DPP has also recommended investigating whether other officers present failed to assist a person in danger. What did they see? What did they do? Was help provided when it was needed? The police must account for the actions of everyone involved.
The successful removal of the bullet offers hope, and the medical teams deserve recognition. But Ćlodieās long-term recovery remains uncertain. Medical progress cannot settle responsibility for the shooting.
To the ministers who visit, meet the family or publicly express solidarity your responsibility does not end when you leave.
A visit can bring comfort. Sympathy can be sincere. But what lasting support will follow? Who will help this family through treatment, any rehabilitation and the financial burdens that may arise?
Ministers can return to their routines. Ćlodieās family cannot simply return to life before that night.
Her two-year-old daughter needs her mother. Her husband is living through fear and uncertainty. Their needs must matter just as much when the cameras leave and the headlines change.
The government must account for its commitments. Ministers must support the family while respecting the independence of investigators and prosecutors. Justice must follow the evidence, free from political pressure or protection.
The sergeant faces provisional accusations of using a firearm to intimidate and causing involuntary injuries through negligence. The DPP says important evidence remains outstanding and that the evidence currently available does not support a provisional attempted-murder charge. That is a preliminary assessment, not the conclusion of the case.
I want the investigation completed properly, charges supported by the full evidence and consequences proportionate to whatever wrongdoing is proven. Suspension alone cannot substitute for criminal accountability.
The law already provides serious penalties. Section 37 of the Firearms Act criminalises using, displaying, aiming or firing a firearm with intent to intimidate, with a maximum fine of Rs 100,000 and imprisonment of up to 15 years. It recognises a defence of lawful protection of oneself or another person.
The question is whether the law will be enforced fully and fairly when the accused wears a uniform.
The policeās own published ethics require justified force, the minimum force necessary and personal accountability for acts and omissions. Police leadership must explain how those standards were upheld or breached at Camp-Levieux.
This case comes amid other troubling reports: officers arrested in investigations involving alleged drug-importation conspiracies and fraud, alongside sworn allegations concerning planted drug evidence. These remain allegations, not convictions. Citizens deserve credible investigations, clear reporting of the outcomes and safeguards against further abuses.
The government has announced tougher penalties for serious motoring offences. Road safety matters. Citizens deserve equally visible determination when police powers are allegedly abused. Respect for the law must apply to those who enforce it as firmly as it applies to everyone else.
Then there is water.
In September, approximately 13,000 households in RiviĆØre-Noire and Le Morne were reported to be receiving intermittent supply. People are working, raising children and managing their homes without dependable access to a basic necessity.
Meanwhile, villas, apartments and holiday properties continue to be developed. I cannot quantify their contribution to the shortage. But the government and planning authorities must answer a straightforward question: how do they establish that infrastructure can support additional demand while existing residents struggle?
Publish those assessments. Explain the investment required, who must fund it and when residents will see improvements.
The government has announced emergency water measures. The minister responsible and the CWA must provide clear timelines, measurable progress and transparent explanations of how scarce supplies are allocated.
In 2026, being able to shower, cook and use a toilet should be a dependable part of daily life. Citizens should not have to organise every day around whether their taps will run.
I do not wish for this situation to become more violent or destructive. I want children in school, workers safe and peopleās homes and livelihoods protected.
I also want those in power to understand that public anger cannot be answered with reassurance alone.
Enough is enough. Give people honest answers. Honour your commitments. Investigate alleged wrongdoing independently. Deliver meaningful consequences where it is proven. Show improvements that people can see in their daily lives.
Trust has to be earned.
Ćlodieās family deserves lasting support. Every Mauritian deserves reliable water, safety and equal treatment before the law.
She was coming home from work.
We must not let her story become another tragedy followed by sympathy, official promises and then silence.