All of my professors expressly prohibit the use of AI to generate course deliverables, as that would be plagiarism, academic dishonesty, and would defeat the purpose of being enrolled in college to learn. In some courses, it is permitted as a study tool or to proofread written work, but never for actually writing the assignment submission.
However, I have one professor who clearly develops assignment feedback using AI and then just reviews what the AI develops, and even says in-class they do so due to being "too busy."
I feel there are some ethical issues with this scenario. First of all, I'm quite busy with my four courses, but I'm not permitted to use AI to generate my work for review just because I am "too busy." In addition, students, when registering for the course, did not consent to their work being fed into AI and the potential personal information which AI could learn and retain. Finally, the professor does not include an AI disclosure when submitting assignment feedback in Canvas, which I feel essentially passes off AI's feedback as his own to the college, which would be plagiarism.
If PSU wanted AI grading systems, I'm sure they could invest in this instead and save some money. However, they hire and pay professors to lecture and give human-provided feedback as it is better for the learning experience.
What do others think about this?