I’m not saying we can’t criticize James it was tbe done activism for Ukraine part

Also I have seen that account praise Roger Waters gross

I am aware of the exploitation as indentured servants that Irish people went through. However, that doesn't mean they were enslaved. Of course, the myth they were sold by jewish people is unverified and has no backing. Even if it was true, this doesn't justify antisemitism against jews today, nor does Israel's current genocide against Palestinians, since not every jew has done it nor have they supported it.

I almost wonder if these dudes want to make hating Israel tied to antisemitism because they can't help themselves or perhaps it's a psyop. This dude, StrasseriteMMA, Guy Christiansen, or Rathbone. None of these dudes seem to care about leftism but love bigotry against Jews, Ukrianians, and Muslims if they can't be used as a cudgel to say "America bad." These people are wretched and clearly just want to be nazis but in a way where they can feel good about their bigotry.

Antisemitism doesn't help workers or victims of genocide, but it makes people want to take you seriously less and it makes innocent jews unsafe. Innocent jews shouldn't be attacked because Israel is evil, and that's the case for islamophobia against innocent muslims if Saudi Arabia or Iran does something bad as well.

It is (in both senses of the word) a purely reactionary stance. 

1. First in that it is supporting existing capitalist power structures.
2. Second, more literally, in that it is a knee jerk reaction. It contributes to no overall coherent socialist ideology or strategy.

If one supports or defends Russian imperialism on the grounds it is combatting the larger and more globally threatening US imperialism, then, logically, 30 years from now, if Russia is the world capitalist superpower, that person will flip flop to supporting US imperialism against the larger and more globally threatening Russian imperialism.

Taking such a stance effectively makes one a cheerleader for the capitalist underdog. You may as well spend your energy watching the market share of Coke and Pepsi, and simping for whichever one is lower.  

Supporting weaker capitalist imperialism is supporting capitalist imperialism. Refusing to consider conflicts on a case by case basis is intellectually lazy, ideologically incoherent, and contributes to no overall socialist goal, only an anti-West (until such a time it is anti-East) goal. 

On the other hand, supporting working people of every nation against attacks on their self determination builds international relationships, denounces capitalism and its constant self induced crises, and supports working people’s ability to develop class consciousness by eliminating existential threats which keep them from directing attention to their own capitalist class.

A previous post made me aware of this article. This doesn't mean that's now it's an anarcho-airport housing the anarcho-vanguard, but it is still very promising. Whether you think this is gonna lead to the big R or not, things are happening.

I myself believe in the no state solution, easily because the one state or two state solution doesn't solve the problem of Israel and the problem in Palestine (also its is a more anarchist view of the situation as being against nation states, also neither one state nor two really gets at the root of the problem for anyone inhabiting the land). For others, the argument of a one state solution is more favorable cause it means the end of the Zionist project of Israel.

But for some, you just cant please them no matter how much solidarity you have in you. I suggest looking up the accounts for more context since both are advocates for Palestine. Imo, the dude (stressdoc) maybe wrong and is suspicious to a point but the other account is just so obnoxious about it.

Im tired boss