Exactly, so why would you claim there was consistent people covering this case from one administration to the next?

That would be the Fake Elector plot:

“"I'm just not going to leave," Trump told one aide, according to Haberman. "We're never leaving," Trump told another. "How can you leave when you won an election?"... He was even overheard asking the chair of the Republican National Committee, Ronna McDaniel, "Why should I leave if they stole it from me?"[12]
This was confirmed by the testimony of Jenna Ellisin the Georgia election racketeering prosecution. In December 2020, after Trump lost the election, while he was standing in a hallway near the Blue Room of the White House, Dan Scavino told Ellis that Trump would refuse to leave office. Ellis recalled: "And he said to me, you know, in a kind of excited tone, 'Well, we don't care, and we're not going to leave.'"[13] "The boss is not going to leave under any circumstances. We are just going to stay in power."[14]”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_fake_electors_plot

Great.

How do you know?

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/how-the-trump-administration-erased-centuries-of-justice-department-experience

Nope. I’ve seen it.

Yes, it does actually. We need to see how the federal government prosecutes crimes which means being able to track which investigations led to charges

How were you mistreated by leftists?

What was she doing when you met her?

It doesn’t. Those pairings are rarer.

Right… because your parents tell you how old you are.

If they lied to her since she was young, how would she know?

Then is it Biden’s investigation or Trump’s?

Right… I’m asking you about your experience with those people. When your friends pushed you, how did strangers react?

So, rightwingers helped you when you were behaving oddly, by pushing you to talk to people who were not rightwingers?

What did those people say?

No.

Why is it funny?

I’m really asking you how you would know if your parents lied to you about your age.

Can you answer the question?

Not necessarily no. Because we are talking about unearned advantages, not a meritocracy. If you give your brother a job sailing ships because he’s your brother, how many is he allowed to lose before you hire somebody else?

Would you let him tank the company?

“Unfortunately, less than one- third of family-owned businesses survive the transition from the first generation of ownership to the second - and only 13 percent of family businesses remain in the family over 60 years.”

https://www.salientwpg.com/blog/10-pitfalls-to-avoid-with-succession-of-a-family-run-business

And this is a law he violated by speaking?

I’m asking what the rules should be, because if everyone doesn’t have to follow them then what use are they?

“Obama ignored Russia”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_reset

When are we allowed to look at tax returns?

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/dojs-tax-settlement-with-trump-sets-dangerous-precedent-former-irs-commissioner-says

He didn’t initiate this investigation. It was a separate one on her finances.

What are they investigating now exactly?

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/26/us/politics/ilhan-omar-investigation-finances.html

The government isn’t taking your money against your will. That’s the whole point of electing a representative government.

Why would I be set off by the fact you think your wife’s feelings aren’t real?

I didn’t marry you.

Well yes, this is why republicans seem to think all relationships are transactional. It’s a selfish perspective that breeds a weird kind of altruism. You can see it in their anti lgbt stances too. Why would you cut off your gay child just for being gay?

Because they owe you grandchildren. Their life was ultimately a tool to achieve that so they don’t get to make choices for their own happiness.