I am not well off and, English is not my first language. With that being said, does "50% bequest of my estate" mean this dude was going to leave half of his earthly belongings to the school he went to? If this comment is too far off the point of the comment, please disregard it as I'm not trying to diminish his message. I'm just trying to understand it all the way through. Thanks and, sorry if it's a bit ranty.
Those donations are a form of charity. Endowment money at major universities like Cornell is used to fund financial aid for students. I went to an Ivy and had friends from poor families who got paid a stipend to attend. That money is possible because of the large endowment.
Oh. So it's also a tax break? The reason this confuses me I guess is, usually people seem to fight their spouse's claim for half when they divorce and it seemed unusual to my poor people sensibilities to count that as a possibility. Writing huge checks for fake libraries and stuff, I understand. Just handing some money over for a tax break because it's the easiest way to get the IRS not to look at your other dealings, I also get. The naming in the will in the amount of 50% though, I was having a hard time with. Thanks for clearing that up.
It's not a tax break.
The first $14 million is handed down tax-free to heirs in the US, so unless the letter writer is super super rich, there's no taxes to be paid.
I would guess that the letter writer is lying about donating half of their estate to the university.
If they were going to bequest half, the schoolâs fundraising dept is likely already aware of it. You notify these kinds of donations in advance so that 1) the school/charity/nonprofit can plan, and 2) you can get the social benefits of being a major donor while still alive.
According to his financial disclosures from when he ran for office his networth is likely under $65k. Not likely Cornell is planning anything around this guy's donation.
Alums donating part of their estate to the alma mater they feel set them up for success is very common. The top 20s have been using this strategy for decades, which is one of the main reasons they have insane amounts of money.
Source: used to work in university finance office for a Top 20.
I donât think theyâre lying about that personally, but whether they are or not really doesnât matter all that much if it leads to significantly reduced donations this year & next
50% off the top is a lot of gratitude in a world where people fight the mother of their children in court for that exact amount. Before I made this comment I asked my wife if it sounded like I was bashing this guy. She said it did a little bit and that's loving wife speak for "probably". I want to make clear, I am not! I'm only struggling with the concept of the idea.
I wish this was more widely known. I went to a top public university but I might have been able to go to an Ivy if I had known. My parents never went to college and my guidance counselor was useless. so I just assumed Ivy Leagues were more expensive.
While I personally wouldnât leave half of my estate to a university, deciding to do so is (supposed to be) promoting science, arts, and education. Thatâs hardly a despicable thing to doâŚ
There is no advanced society without promoting intellectualism. Leading universities do amazing things for civilization.
the fund isn't promoting intellectualism it's promoting his progeny to attend the university without needing to have the 5.0 GPA, 43 extra curriculars, and the sob story to be able to attend the ivy league
Helping others by donating your wealth to the university that helped mold you and prepare you to make such wealth is a noble and honorable thing to do, even in todayâs anti-establishment zeitgeist
Thanks. If his intentions are that pure with his money, and not just trying to keep from his kids having to pay a wealth tax on their inheritance, I truly hope he'll find a way to help those future generations that doesn't involve giving it to people complicit in rape. Gang or otherwise.
The thing about charitable tax breaks is even if you didnât give that money to charity, you would still get to keep more of it if it was all taxed. Like, unless youâre one of these massive corps that has a functional 0% tax rate (however that works), charitable giving isnât going to have you end up with MORE money than you started had you not donated it. Itâs just lowering the barrier to entry for people to be generous.
The federal inheritance tax is also quite low and starts at a very high price tag. I live in one of the handful of states that on top of that has a state-level estate tax for basically any asset you inherit, but itâs like, pennies on the dollar. Leaving 50% of an estate large enough to potentially be taxed federally is still a life changing cash infusion for a small nonprofit, for example.
Iâm really going to struggle to be convinced that out of all things on Maslowâs Hierarchy of Charitable Needs right now, a university that already has a massive endowment needs half of this guyâs estate when he dies vs. organizations that provide direct aid for food insecurity, homelessness, DV escape support, etc.
Maybe he also is a mega donor to all of these things already, in which case, I have nothing to criticize and should mind my own business. But personally, although I got a fabulous education at both of my non-Ivy public universities that definitely helped me get where I am today, neither of them are going to see the kind of money that Iâm throwing at the teen center in my hometown thatâs barely staying afloat while trying to keep vulnerable kids from unaliving themselves. I guess I have a hard time taking a mega donation to an Ivy League endowment quite as seriously with the state of the world lately.
Respect to him for pulling it over this situation regardless though.
it's about class. The elite always send their kids who have mid grades and performance to Ivy Leagues off the back of their wealth while poor students who try hard but couldn't do extra curriculars have to go to state schools. The university you attend is itself a status symbol that affects your lifetime earnings potential. it's all classism. If Universities had to shuffle their professors and a teacher could teach one year at Harvard and then one year at UCLA and then the next year find themselves at East Carolina University would not be a classist system, but when the best can only at the highest institutions that prodiminatly only let in the wealthiest applicants and keep a small reserve for exceptional students so the wealthiest can pay themselves on the back, it's classist.
Then the schools would be beholden to the government. Didnât Trump try to shut down Harvard? They told him to fuck off because they have billions in endowments and can be totally independent of the whims of politicians. Universities should be independent of politics and strive for truth, being dependent on the government for money endangers that.
These schools tend to have the best financial aid packages available, thanks mostly to donations and whatnot. I got to go to an Ivy League for ~5k/yr with 0 loans, because of my familyâs low income and the really generous financial aid program. I was accepted to several schools, and the Ivy League financial aid offers were uniformly better than every single alternative.
33
u/Idiotwithaphone79 10d ago
I am not well off and, English is not my first language. With that being said, does "50% bequest of my estate" mean this dude was going to leave half of his earthly belongings to the school he went to? If this comment is too far off the point of the comment, please disregard it as I'm not trying to diminish his message. I'm just trying to understand it all the way through. Thanks and, sorry if it's a bit ranty.