MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PoursTea/comments/1x8bdt3/business_as_usual/phdor95/?context=3
r/PoursTea • u/Veshaad Timendi Causa Est Nescire • 8h ago
106 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
Why am I attacking the corrupt?
1 u/EveryonesANurse 1h ago No Why you single out the wealthy as corrupt and exclude everyone else who is seemingly innocent of corruption 1 u/Helporsomethinglike 1h ago Interesting. I never singled out anyone. I just said corrupt. 1 u/EveryonesANurse 1h ago Yes but the implication is that the wealthy are And you referred to American People as a whole entity 1 u/Helporsomethinglike 1h ago I said that Americans out number the corrupt. I didn't imply anything, nor say anything else. You know what projecting is, right? 1 u/EveryonesANurse 57m ago You just said it again though "Americans"" can't possibly outnumber "the corrupt" unless you believe average Americans are never 350 million to what number of "corrupt" 10000? 5?
No
Why you single out the wealthy as corrupt and exclude everyone else who is seemingly innocent of corruption
1 u/Helporsomethinglike 1h ago Interesting. I never singled out anyone. I just said corrupt. 1 u/EveryonesANurse 1h ago Yes but the implication is that the wealthy are And you referred to American People as a whole entity 1 u/Helporsomethinglike 1h ago I said that Americans out number the corrupt. I didn't imply anything, nor say anything else. You know what projecting is, right? 1 u/EveryonesANurse 57m ago You just said it again though "Americans"" can't possibly outnumber "the corrupt" unless you believe average Americans are never 350 million to what number of "corrupt" 10000? 5?
Interesting. I never singled out anyone. I just said corrupt.
1 u/EveryonesANurse 1h ago Yes but the implication is that the wealthy are And you referred to American People as a whole entity 1 u/Helporsomethinglike 1h ago I said that Americans out number the corrupt. I didn't imply anything, nor say anything else. You know what projecting is, right? 1 u/EveryonesANurse 57m ago You just said it again though "Americans"" can't possibly outnumber "the corrupt" unless you believe average Americans are never 350 million to what number of "corrupt" 10000? 5?
Yes but the implication is that the wealthy are
And you referred to American People as a whole entity
1 u/Helporsomethinglike 1h ago I said that Americans out number the corrupt. I didn't imply anything, nor say anything else. You know what projecting is, right? 1 u/EveryonesANurse 57m ago You just said it again though "Americans"" can't possibly outnumber "the corrupt" unless you believe average Americans are never 350 million to what number of "corrupt" 10000? 5?
I said that Americans out number the corrupt. I didn't imply anything, nor say anything else.
You know what projecting is, right?
1 u/EveryonesANurse 57m ago You just said it again though "Americans"" can't possibly outnumber "the corrupt" unless you believe average Americans are never 350 million to what number of "corrupt" 10000? 5?
You just said it again though
"Americans"" can't possibly outnumber "the corrupt" unless you believe average Americans are never
350 million to what number of "corrupt" 10000? 5?
1
u/Helporsomethinglike 2h ago
Why am I attacking the corrupt?