MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SipsTea/comments/1x8a6pn/uk_is_banning_game_of_thrones/phbwgpb/?context=3
r/SipsTea • u/StarforgeVoyager • 16h ago
99 comments sorted by
View all comments
58
But how is step brother going to get stepsister free from the washing machine?
1 u/why_1337 13h ago That's not incest, is it? 14 u/De_Dominator69 13h ago This law is classing it as such. Which is why it's so dumb and massively overreaching, considering actual real relations between step-siblings would be perfectly legal. 6 u/Jormungand1342 13h ago So if step-siblings have sex and record it for sale. The relationship is legal but the porn isnt. Big oof. Hope they aren't voyeurs 2 u/BeneficialPenalty258 12h ago You are right. The law is for actual portrayal of incest. Though it also covers step siblings where one is portraying someone under 18. 2 u/AlternativePea6203 10h ago It's already illegal if anyone is under or portrayed to be under 18, so that's not true. 1 u/BeneficialPenalty258 10h ago Just going by what the article says.
1
That's not incest, is it?
14 u/De_Dominator69 13h ago This law is classing it as such. Which is why it's so dumb and massively overreaching, considering actual real relations between step-siblings would be perfectly legal. 6 u/Jormungand1342 13h ago So if step-siblings have sex and record it for sale. The relationship is legal but the porn isnt. Big oof. Hope they aren't voyeurs 2 u/BeneficialPenalty258 12h ago You are right. The law is for actual portrayal of incest. Though it also covers step siblings where one is portraying someone under 18. 2 u/AlternativePea6203 10h ago It's already illegal if anyone is under or portrayed to be under 18, so that's not true. 1 u/BeneficialPenalty258 10h ago Just going by what the article says.
14
This law is classing it as such. Which is why it's so dumb and massively overreaching, considering actual real relations between step-siblings would be perfectly legal.
6 u/Jormungand1342 13h ago So if step-siblings have sex and record it for sale. The relationship is legal but the porn isnt. Big oof. Hope they aren't voyeurs
6
So if step-siblings have sex and record it for sale. The relationship is legal but the porn isnt. Big oof. Hope they aren't voyeurs
2
You are right. The law is for actual portrayal of incest. Though it also covers step siblings where one is portraying someone under 18.
2 u/AlternativePea6203 10h ago It's already illegal if anyone is under or portrayed to be under 18, so that's not true. 1 u/BeneficialPenalty258 10h ago Just going by what the article says.
It's already illegal if anyone is under or portrayed to be under 18, so that's not true.
1 u/BeneficialPenalty258 10h ago Just going by what the article says.
Just going by what the article says.
58
u/BeneficialPenalty258 15h ago
But how is step brother going to get stepsister free from the washing machine?