Well they were going to throw the bottle regardless.
We were already planning on implementing a law that would mandate the cap when returning bottles in Finland before this new bottlecap design came into effect. There were many bottles returned where the cap has been thrown away.
Fair enough, that's a reasonable explanation for keeping caps attached.
But if the design requires additional plastic on every bottle, has anyone actually quantified whether the reduction in discarded caps outweighs the additional plastic being produced?
I'm curious whether there's a demonstrated net environmental benefit here, rather than simply an assumption that attached caps must mean less waste.
9
u/irn-bru-anonymous 6h ago
How exactly does it “reduce” waste. The bottle is still plastic. The cap is still there. Now there’s a bit more plastic being used per bottle. Yay.