I think the difference is the little boy was with Harambe 10+ mins and they couldn’t separate them safely so to protect the boy and staff they decided to kill Harambe. The man who purposely jumped in the tiger enclosure was only there for 2 mins before he was killed by the tiger. Wasn’t enough time for the zoo to react. If the man was dead by the time they could get the gun there is no point to shot the tiger. Point of the story, Harambe should have acted faster.
27
u/SeeWoke 3h ago
I think the difference is the little boy was with Harambe 10+ mins and they couldn’t separate them safely so to protect the boy and staff they decided to kill Harambe. The man who purposely jumped in the tiger enclosure was only there for 2 mins before he was killed by the tiger. Wasn’t enough time for the zoo to react. If the man was dead by the time they could get the gun there is no point to shot the tiger. Point of the story, Harambe should have acted faster.