I said IF x had occurred and then explicitly rejected that possibility. IF they had intentionally let the man die, which they hadn't. Which is what the above commenter suggested, then there likely would be manslaughter charges. I then explained what I thought actually happened, which would not entail manslaughter charges.
I'm not making assumptions. I'm arguing with a person who said that they intentionally let the man die. I said that wasn't the case, in part, because if it were, it would likely entail charges.
0
u/[deleted] 3h ago
[deleted]