AES doing what Sam says he wouldn’t.

Sam Harris recently said in his podcast that El-Sayed is a «covert islamist» because his spidey senses told him so. He clearly doesn’t believe El-Sayed to be a good faith political actor. He also says we should believe jihadists when they say what they mean.

Why not believe El-Sayed when he says what he believes about the constitution?

As someone who knows nothing and is compassed by intuition, the phenomena that are talarico and el sayed give me pause and dare I say hope, especially given the their positions in the non-secular landscape. Am I alone in thinking that a honest, good faith 3 way conversation about everything wouldn’t be interesting? Apologies if this post is redundant.