r/stupidpeoplefacebook • • 8h ago

Source :Trust Me Bro

Post image
1.9k Upvotes

2.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

215

u/AnybodyWannaPeanus 7h ago

There is zero chance that “feature” will ever see public roads. The amount of compressed are needed for that would probably vaporize everyone within 50 feet in a minor accident.

I would actually be more comfortable if it did use propellant.

This was a publicity stunt and the only to only noteworthy thing is the vacuum downforce which also seems dumb when you consider it’ll be sucking up squirrels and random shit on public roads.

It’ll be a regular car with regular features. This stuff will be “2 years out” for the next 20z

113

u/beardeddragon0113 7h ago

"You know how our electric cars have giant batteries that sometimes burst into an unquenchable fireball that burns hot enough to melt metal? What if we add a bunch of highly compressed gas in cannisters around the frame!"

44

u/Real_Time_Mike 7h ago

Makes the destruction of evidence more complete that way.

That Elon... always thinking, that one.

4

u/camel_case_user 5h ago

Maybe he really is the real life Tony Stark

/s

9

u/LurkerFromTheVoid 4h ago

Also, can 1-3 seconds in the air even be considered as "Flying" vs other machines?

For example:

The Kiity Hawk vs Tesla Roadster, what flyes more?

Kitty Hawk wins by a wide margin in actual sustained atmospheric flight—whether comparing the 1903 Wright Flyer at Kitty Hawk or the modern Kitty Hawk eVTOL aircraft against the newly demonstrated Tesla Roadster.

​The only scenario where a Tesla Roadster "flies" farther is if you count Starman’s 2008 Roadster launched atop a Falcon Heavy in 2018, which is in a ballistic heliocentric orbit rather than achieving self-powered aerodynamic flight...so not exactly flying, more like falling forever.

8

u/NaughtAught 6h ago

Remember, in a cybertruck, you are the Crumple Zone

6

u/Majestic_Recover7 5h ago

The gas will blow out the fire like a birthday cake candle! Coming this year, next year at the latest.

3

u/Broad-Promise6954 5h ago

Well, to be fair, they subtracted away most of the batteries. There's only room for propellant now.

2

u/Bendlerp 5h ago

Carbon fiber canisters. Like the submarine that imploded on itself. We car guys figured that out way back in the early 2000's. Carbon fiber intercooler pipes look cool until you hit boost.

24

u/Fragrant_Major_9553 7h ago

It was a concept car, and idiots are just lapping up the bullshit. Every single generation of Corvette from the C3 to the C7 had a concept car alongside it that was mid-rear.

This is nothing more than a thought experiment, and will never see the roads.

1

u/TheDrummerMB 2h ago

I agree it's bullshit, but they are claiming it'll be released. Corvette doesn't do that.

15

u/SonofSniglet 6h ago

It’ll be a regular car with regular features. This stuff will be “2 years out” for the next 20z

Tesla is the "Free beer tomorrow!" of automotive companies.

14

u/Nyysjan 6h ago

We've had rocket packs since the 60s.
The one used in that James Bond film? Not a special effect, actual thing.
Nobody uses them for a reason.
Same for this car.

28

u/fat_fingerz 7h ago

There isn't a zero chance, Elon was proud to admit how he was able to get road safety measures cut so that the cybertruck could get onto American streets, pretty much nowhere else, and with the current US we've got the cyberpunk without the cool robots and implants.

20

u/themostrealandtrue 6h ago

Road safety measures aren't what will stop this thing from going to market. Literally no insurance company in the country will insure this this, and that's what will stop this from going to market.

3

u/therj9 5h ago

Aren't cybertrucks already having to be insured by Tesla because insurance companies won't touch it?

2

u/themostrealandtrue 5h ago

I googled it and it looks like a few different major insurance companies will insure the cyber truck. It's just very expensive.

17

u/AnybodyWannaPeanus 7h ago

Cars that can jump traffic like that could never be safe enough to do that on a public road. They don’t even have FSD down. So regulators will either say this simply can’t operate on public roads or has so be disabled and air tank empty. There isn’t really anything comparable on CT from a public safety perspective. Not even close.

5

u/avt1983 6h ago

Not if we FIRE all the regulators for BLATANT CORRUPTION and LIBRUL BIAS!

2

u/fungusgolem 5h ago

Also, there's basically no use case where this makes any sense in the hands of drivers.

2

u/ace_11235 3h ago

They said in the release materials it won’t be legal for public roads.

9

u/AnonymousLampoon 7h ago

Unfortunately, from what I understand, they already have commercial pricing and branding. It's called the "SpaceX Thruster Upgrade Package" and it's $690,000 USD

I can also, guarantee that this will not see any sort of preventative regulatory oversight to keep this jumping car off the road until this administration is gone. Hopefully the midterms euthanize their mandate and we can finally go back go a little bit of normalcy around here.

7

u/AnybodyWannaPeanus 6h ago

Yeah, because any time Elon uses “69” or “420”, he’s being completely serious. 690k for what amounts to a parlor trick will cement this into the hall of automotive oddities. There won’t be more than a handful produced if any are actually sold. That will only make it harder to make them street legal.

States can also exercise discretion, just like they have with those little Kei pickup trucks.

All this amounts to is a PT Barnum style marketing stunt to get people talking about Tesla. And as you can see, it worked. Whatever they invested to do this, is dwarfed by the amount of discussion/attention this got. The usefulness of the feature ends there.

Also, calling this a “flying car” makes about as much sense as calling the General Lee a flying car.

Those of us who have worked in computer networking have heard of RFC 1925, which sums this up nicely:

“With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead.”

It’s just the most literal example I’ve ever seen to decribe this dumb assed stunt.

2

u/SafetyMan35 6h ago

Publicly stunt and a way to show the relative ease it could be adapted to a lunar or mars lander

2

u/LariusAT 6h ago

Not only squirrels, a single leaf or piece of trash will kill the down force and you'll crash.

1

u/Possible-Mountain698 5h ago

if the only penalty for playing vehicular leapfrog is a fine then you’ll absolutely see it on the roads.

1

u/Vendemmian 5h ago

Given what a pile of shit the CuckTruck was I can only imagine trying to use this. Two fire normally, one doesn't work, one blasts out all it's air instantly and you cartwheel into the fourth floor of an office before exploding.

1

u/Le_rap_a_Billy 4h ago

To add on to this: Tesla isn't nearly the first company to use fan driven suction. The tech has been around since 1970, and McMurty Automotive were the first to use fan suction to hang upside down and drive their electric hypercar in April 2025.

1

u/AntC_808 4h ago

I’m a huge car/motorcycle guy… I swear this is some of the stupidest, most childish shit I’ve ever seen.

When I think of the resources squandered…

Build a world dominating American built Formula One car.

1

u/Careless_Wishter 4h ago

F1 cars in the 90s produced enough downforce to drive up a vertical wall. So, not new, Elon didn't do it, and it has no practical value.

1

u/urbanlife78 4h ago

A new way for squirrels to die

1

u/Mexicutioner01 4h ago

Marqués on YouTube did a video on it with the info he has. That specific unit will not be sold to the public because for 1, it's stupidly loud. And two, yeah. It is not street legal. They will give them out to a few influencers and rich dudes. But as of now it's invite only. At least till Elon just pays off who ever he needs to pay off to make it street legal.

1

u/ChadsworthRothschild 3h ago

The vacuum tech was done by the McMurty Speirling last year, where the car was able to generate enough downforce to stick to the road upside down without driving forward.

1

u/Opie301 3h ago

A publicity stunt at best.

If Tesla is actually taking deposits on cars on the promise of jump jets, it starts to feel like fraud. Or maybe a complicated method of money laundering.

1

u/SpaceIsVastAndEmpty 3h ago

They had this on our 6pm news episode

And they literally followed it with some scientist/engineer guy saying it's an incredibly inefficient form of propulsion being used, and the "fuel" would probably last 6-8 seconds

•

u/NoLie129 24m ago

From what I understand the ramp did the sucking not the car. There is however a real car already in production that can suck itself upside down, and can already do over 4gs in turns. Twice what this has claimed.