Yeah, that's the point. Not playing AI-made games but using AI-made software is totally arbitrary.
I find this arbitrary line comes from people with a weakly developed sense of what is beautiful- i.e. being dependent on things like fame, popularity, profit markers, or other superficial features when trying to determine if something is art/beautiful.
A perfectly tight compiler or a well-coded state machine can be as beautiful as a Monet, but the person above is drawing the line for protecting human beauty in a totally arbitrary way that is likely informed by what things would be too inconvenient to protest.
I don't believe them to be the same. The intention, appeal and purpose behind them is different. I'm not buying any game with an intention of tasting what Chatgpt is cooking.
There are differing levels of tolerance towards AI depending on its use and it's absurd to think otherwise whilst having this discussion.
Edit: I definitely see the point you're try to make though, I'm not deaf to it. I just disagree
23
u/nz-whale 11h ago
I assume you don't use any software that's been worked on in the last year or so then?