credit to u/heatmapper25

I keep seeing comments calling her 'aggressive' and attributing her words to 'violence', and it's alarming. It really seems like a black (or biracial) woman can't do anything right on these shows for these people. Meanwhile they'll eat up racist Ramona who threw a glass at Kristen and cut her lip, but these same fans don't call her aggressive or violent.

Quick context: the plaque in Super Mario 64's courtyard is a 32×32 texture with letters 3–5 pixels tall. For almost 30 years people read "L is real 2401" into it.

I worked on it with AI (Claude Opus 5.5 for the pipeline and analysis, Grok for research and feedback). We didn't read the blurry pixels; we rebuilt how a 1996 artist made the texture (period font, shrink to 32×32, blur, gamma) and searched for the text that reproduces the real pixels.

• Result: "Eternal Star / We hope so", in Adobe's 1990 Palatino Bold Italic.
• Line 1: "Eternal" is #1 of 1.24 million possible first words.
• Line 2: a blind dictionary search returns "We hope so" by itself.
• The legend: "L is real 2401" fits about 2× worse.
• Open: everything is public (code, data, a 50-page report), and anyone can rerun it.

The reaction on X was… intense. Some people engaged with the method. Others went straight to the reply in the image. Over a texture from 1996.

So, genuine questions for both sides:

1. Does AI involvement make a result less valid if every step is open and reproducible? Or does only the evidence count?
2. Is there a difference between "AI slop" and AI used as a research tool with checkable output? Where would you draw that line?
3. Why do people get angrier when AI solves something than when it produces junk? Is it about the tool, or about losing a 30-year-old legend?

Antis: if you think the result is wrong, I'd honestly like to hear it. The repo is there to be falsified: https://github.com/supermochi64/sm64-plaque-decode

If all of you don't deposit Rs.1000 in my account by tonight
Ill post more and more video of here

The most upvoted post in this subreddit ever is currently an Anti Elon slop post that is using a misleading image with bad lighting to suggest the Roadster is hollow.

It's not the Navier–Stokes problem being solved, Anthropic having a AI assisted medical breakthrough or some of the other amazing things that happened in 2026, it's something that is indistinguishable from what you would read on r/futurology or some generic Anti Elon subreddit.

I personally don't care about the Roadster or other sport cars, it's very low in my ranking of Elon products I'm excited about, but if you can't talk about Tesla or SpaceX, who whether you like it or not, are some of the most important accelerationist companies, without people being insufferable and turning it into a cultural war issue in the comment section, then I'm probably going to stay away from this subreddit in the future and just stick with X for tech/AI discussions, that was also the reason I stopped using r/singularity a few years ago.

Ständig liest oder hört man von „politischer Unkorrektheit“. Das ist aber bei näherer Betrachtung nur feige.

Weil ein Liedtext, ein Bild oder ein Wort rassistisch, frauenfeindlich oder in einer der zahlreichen anderen Weisen menschenverachtend ist, es bloß nicht zu benutzen, weil es „politisch unkorrekt“ ist, zeigt fehlende Auseinandersetzung mit dem Thema und schiebt den unangenehmen Teil einem vermeintlichen Verbot durch die Politik zu. Das verharmlost die Tragweite und legitimiert die Nutzung, denn es sei ja nur unkorrekt - nichts weiter. Nein! Es ist einfach herabwürdigend und der Begriff sollte freiwillig nicht genutzt werden, statt es auf die vermeintliche Allgemeinheit zu schieben.

Ich meine: Nennt das Problem beim Namen. Ich benutze Wörter nicht weil sie rassistisch sind und nicht einfach nur „politisch unkorrekt“.

Das ist meiner Auffassung nach auch die Ursache für „das wird man ja nochmal sagen dürfen“. Klar - denn es gibt kein politisches Verbot aufgrund von „Unkorrektheit“ - du nutzt dann einfach nur menschenverachtende Sprache.

Und wer bei dem Titel in eine andere Richtung dachte und in der Hoffnung auf Zustimmung auf diesen Beitrag geklickt hat - dich spreche ich insbesondere an.

edit:
Holy was habe ich hier losgetreten. Ich bin ehrlich gesagt maßlos enttäuscht - aber dieser Kommentarbereich erklärt vieles. Schade.

Absolute bottom of the barrel players live in this sub.

This sub is a big reason why dungeon grind got nerfed, big reason why arenas probably wont exist in forever, and why gdkp got banned in the first place.

This sub is advocating now for all types of weird shit like delaying raid release schedule for literal months.

Now that I finally realized the majority of these guys are grey parsing, hard stuck at 1500 rating losers I can understand why they have these povs

The most circular ouroborous nothing burger shit ever. The entire crutch of the allegations was that she was 16

This is nothing its literally nothing

I have the green scarf but I haven’t put it on yet lol

Fully body edit:

What you see was taken shortly after 12:30.

Yes I was "late" to the protest. The reason I say "late" in quotations is due to the fact the protest moved. There was no communication or organization regarding these issues.

Myself and many others showed up "late" because we were not expecting the protest to move. The organizer did not post these moves anywhere.

There were 2 location changes over the course of the protest. Grand Parade and the Province House. Grand Parade from what I've seen had an incredible turn out, I ended up meeting up with the remaining crew outside PH which had about 30 peopleish hanging around.

I stayed until there were 4 of us left.

I make these complaints for the sole fact I care. A protest without organization or communication only causes active resistance to falter, together we are stronger than they are.

I’ve been thinking about Kamala Harris’s comments about expanding the Supreme Court and potentially adding states if Democrats regain control of Congress.

I can understand the argument that the current system may need reform, but expanding the Court also seems like it could create a dangerous precedent. If one party expands the Court when it gains power, what would stop the other party from doing the same when it takes control?

At the same time, there are legitimate arguments for reconsidering how the Supreme Court and statehood work in the first place.

I’m curious how people see this. Would these changes represent necessary political reform, or could they make the institutions even more politically divided?

interesting that he could be considered one of the worst playoff performers ever if he wasn’t carried to later rounds

I get it, people could like whatever they want, but there are some things that just objectively suck or subjectively suck to 99% of the population and only a small minority likes it due to strange circumstances and personal preferences.

It is ok to like things that suck dude, thats why guilty pleasures are a thing. Stop trying to justify it and act like it is actually good.

*insert (thing) fans here\*