r/SipsTea • • 8h ago

Lmao gottem Valid point

Post image
35.2k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.9k

u/True_Protection6842 8h ago

One exists and is wildly useful. The other is self indulgent bullshit to distract from the fact that Tesla is a terrible company that would be bankrupt without the circus act. 

471

u/TheQuadricorn 7h ago edited 7h ago

How much fucking money was deposited to make a piece of shit car fly for a couple of seconds that could have changed many many lives makes me sick. Fuck this timeline and fuck that musk gooch

Edit words

33

u/ArcticCelt 5h ago

How much fucking money was deposited to make a piece of shit car fly for a couple of seconds

They basically used the stabilization from SpaceX mixed with the old compress air gimmick that was used in the 1984 Olympics, which only work for very short flights because you quickly run out of compressed Nitrogen after a couple of seconds, which is a technology from the cutting edge 1960s. It's great to make a visual stunt but you need to constantly recharge the nitrogen canisters each time the feature is used to impress your friends for a couple of seconds.

-3

u/Balogunned 5h ago

I don’t get Reddit. This was a dope demonstration. Everyone acting like their personal money was spent on something stupid. Spending money on plastic water bottles when perfectly good water comes from some pipes nearby is just as insane in my book.

9

u/Bruno_Mart 5h ago

It's technically less impressive than the similar 1974 Bond stunt which had to be calculated on 1974 computers, less practical than the 1960s olympic jetpack, and will never ever reach production. Where exactly should anyone be impressed?

2

u/NibblyPig 4h ago

Really, the 1974 stunt in which a driver drove the car to a predetermined speed and aimed at a ramp, which made the car spin and land?

Keep in mind we had computers calculating bomb trajectories in planes in 1916 onwards.

This was an entirely automated demo in which a car drove upside down and then flipped and automatically self-righted. It is really not technically less impressive at all.

-1

u/Balogunned 4h ago

I would argue that it is more impressive than the bond stunt. I never seen people get so mad about a stunt in my life.

11

u/sedativumxnx 4h ago

This is how much people love Musk. And what he does. What's not clear? It's all a distraction from the fact he spent almost 400 million dollars this election cycle. Who tf cares about a stupid impractical stunt that's making their stock plummet?

Edit: or the fact he's throttling starlink in Ukraine. This guy is a pos. He's pure evil. Only very stupid.

2

u/TheQuadricorn 4h ago

The comments defending him are so far removed from reality. The majority of them are likely bots, and all of them can’t handle an ounce of reasoned argument.

-1

u/CurvySexretLady 3h ago

Edit: or the fact he's throttling starlink in Ukraine. This guy is a pos. He's pure evil. Only very stupid.

Musk nor Starlink made this decision. They were forced to by the government.

2

u/TheBaalzak 3h ago

The government Elon worked for, and the one he keeps spending 100s of millions of dollars to keep in power? That government?

-1

u/CurvySexretLady 2h ago

What? Starshield is operated by the US Military under the authority and directives of the President of the United States. Starshield is who throttled and restricted Ukraine's military use of that service.

Not musk. Not SpaceX, not Starlink: Starshield.

2

u/TheBaalzak 2h ago

The President Elon worked for, and the one he keeps spending 100s of millions of dollars to keep in power? That President?

-1

u/CurvySexretLady 2h ago

Yes, that President, the same one that Elon Musk had a public crazy falling out with.

That President, and past and future presidents control the US Military. The US Military controls Starshield, not musk, not Starlink, and the US Military answers to the authority and directives of the US President.

Musk doesn't control it, so blaming Musk is misdirected angst.

2

u/TheBaalzak 2h ago

The President that Elon put in power and still funds.

That President.

Somehow you think that's entirely unrelated. Interesting (read: "naive") take.

https://www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-is-almost-single-handedly-funding-the-republicans-midterms-push/

→ More replies (0)

4

u/KathrynBooks 4h ago

It is performative... it looks cool but beyond that what does it do? Great, now cars can do a kick-flip.

0

u/Balogunned 4h ago

Ok. That’s every stunt ever.

0

u/CurvySexretLady 3h ago

Right? Too bad we didn't have reddit back when Evil Knivel was wasting his money doing crazy motorcycle stunts so that reddit could tell us how it was all just a waste on a performative spectacle.

1

u/KathrynBooks 40m ago

Evil Knivel was a stunt man putting on a performance... Not some psycho billionaire trying to play Tony Stark

1

u/CurvySexretLady 28m ago

So when Evel Knievel spends money putting on elaborate, dangerous stunts for an audience, it's entertainment.

But when Tesla puts on an elaborate stunt demonstrating its technology, suddenly we're supposed to be outraged that it's performative?

Sounds like your objection isn't really to the spectacle. It's to who's putting it on. 😂

1

u/KathrynBooks 7m ago

Because they are both performances... Knivel was just honest about it.

This isn't some amazing leap in technology, this is a marketing gimmick by someone who has spent years making people's life worse.

1

u/CurvySexretLady 4m ago

So at least we agree they're both performances. Glad we cleared that up.

Now apparently Evel Knievel was "honest" about his stunts, but Tesla isn't?

What exactly was dishonest about demonstrating a car performing a stunt in front of an audience?

Whether you personally dislike Musk doesn't somehow make the demonstration less impressive or the engineering team at Tesla behind it worthless. 😂

→ More replies (0)

2

u/ConfessSomeMeow 2h ago

Everyone acting like their personal money was spent on something stupid.

Do you have any idea how much US tax money is being wasted on corrupt boondoggle contracts with Tesla? I have every right to be indignant at the waste.